Jump to content

The Rubber Match (vs. NATIONALS, 8/16)


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

Just now, SteveA said:

Well, when your starter is knocked out in the first and you are facing Scherzer, your chances aren't good.   We made it a game.

It's disappointing that poor defense made the difference.

I'm worried Means might become a headcase like Matusz, Arrieta, Tillman, and the cast of thousands who've had "great stuff" but absolutely implode in the first inning for us. They've been doing it since 1998, maybe even earlier. "Flashes of brilliance" describes about every Orioles starter we've tried to raise through the farm system.

Maybe we should adopt a strategy of "buy the arms, grow the bats" since it seems we don't have any problem coaching hitters. Go spend money on guys like Scherzer when they hit FA (obviously not Scherzer himself, he's getting old, but I mean sign him when he was on the market after being with the Tigers.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Philip said:

Was it really not obvious that that’s a joke? The whole point of the comment was that there are no kids in the stand.

however, I think Nunez should have had it. His defense is just terrible everywhere.

Totally disagree that one was on Nunez.    It was far to his backhand side and shorthopped in a very awkward way.    But the earlier play where Núñez had to take the out at first rather than cutting down the lead runner was costly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, allquixotic said:

I'm worried Means might become a headcase like Matusz, Arrieta, Tillman, and the cast of thousands who've had "great stuff" but absolutely implode in the first inning for us. They've been doing it since 1998, maybe even earlier. "Flashes of brilliance" describes about every Orioles starter we've tried to raise through the farm system.

Maybe we should adopt a strategy of "buy the arms, grow the bats" since it seems we don't have any problem coaching hitters. Go spend money on guys like Scherzer when they hit FA (obviously not Scherzer himself, he's getting old, but I mean sign him when he was on the market after being with the Tigers.)

Would be "funny" if less stuff Means was an all-star and good stuff Means is a bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, allquixotic said:

I'm worried Means might become a headcase like Matusz, Arrieta, Tillman, and the cast of thousands who've had "great stuff" but absolutely implode in the first inning for us. They've been doing it since 1998, maybe even earlier. "Flashes of brilliance" describes about every Orioles starter we've tried to raise through the farm system.

Maybe we should adopt a strategy of "buy the arms, grow the bats" since it seems we don't have any problem coaching hitters. Go spend money on guys like Scherzer when they hit FA (obviously not Scherzer himself, he's getting old, but I mean sign him when he was on the market after being with the Tigers.)

Whoa let's not no to conclusions here.

We have a pitcher that missed a chunk of summer camp which was already a weird way to prep for a season.  He came back, and his first start didn't go well, but then his second was very good.  Then he loses his father and is gone for 12 days and probably didn't pitch at all.

So he comes out and isn't sharp, his defense let's him down, and he's taken out before he endanger his arm with a 40+ pitch inning.

To go from there to "head case" is a ridiculous leap, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Down 5-1 to a future HOF when your starter doesn’t get out of 1st inning. Let’s play well rest of week. 

Except that we came back, all the way back, and we were in front, except we have some sucky pictures and some periodic terrible defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Totally disagree that one was on Nunez.    It was far to his backhand side and shorthopped in a very awkward way.    But the earlier play where Núñez had to take the out at first rather than cutting down the lead runner was costly.  

I only saw the play once, so I will defer to your judgment. I think my larger point that Nunez’ defense is not good anywhere remains valid however

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Philip said:

The defense cost us, the pitching cost us, I’m not going to blame the hitting, overall I think the hitting was pretty good. I will however blame the manager for not lobbying for some of the better players who are available.

I'm hoping it works out for Nunez at 1st base - and if he focuses just on 1st base and works hard at it, he can do a decent job there - he certainly cannot at 3rd base - where he should never play again.  But yeah, he's got to improve, or he's just a DH.  1st base is a more important position than most people understand, imo - even if not much athleticism is needed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • The Machado trade wasn't the mark of poor judgment.  We got a decent return for when we traded him (2018, with less than a year of control left).  The underlying issue was failure to recognize the timing of that team's window shutting.  2017 started off well enough, but May was punctuated by a 5-14 stretch in the last 19 games of the month (including a 7 game losing streak) and a losing June (that had a 6 game losing streak).  They then limped into the AS Break on a 3-6 July start (including another 5 game losing streak).  Went from a season best 22-10 on May 10, to 42-46 at the break. The pitching clearly couldn't keep up, and denial is a powerful thing.  We didn't do any selling or start a minor rebuild.  Whether that was a Duquette decision or an Angelos decision... who can say? I always look back at that period as having a silver lining though.  We had to crash and burn... to be built back to strength with our modern iteration of our team.  I'm not so sure that the team would have decided to take the same path if they had found additional ways of treading water for several seasons longer than they actually did... so I'm loathe to criticize the failures in the last seasons of the Duquette era.  Without them, we very well might not be where we are today. 
    • Even our bad lineups have a brutal top half of the order for opposing pitchers. 
    • Mullins had a good AB left on left last night that hopefully is a good sign of a turnaround. 10 pitches and fought off several fastballs that he has been swinging through. Ultimately just a groundout but I thought it was encouraging.    Liked the bunt single too. 
    • Well...the "A" team hasn't been scoring runs when he pitches anyway.  Might as well shake it up a bit.
    • And it's real, so real, so real, so real, so real, so real Can you dig it Whooo-oooh I can dig it, he can dig it She can dig it, we can dig it They can dig it, you can dig it Oh, let's dig it Can you dig it, baby I can dig it, he can dig it She can dig it, we can dig it They can dig it, you can dig it Oh, let's dig it Can you dig it, baby    
    • I was thinking he'll get until the AS break to show some signs of life, but it could happen by Father's Day. I'm not implying that they'll release him but that his role could decrease significantly.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...