Jump to content

Hyde has "The Talk" with John Means


wildcard

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Roch asked the same question today:  

 

 

I’ll vote for Hyde when he starts pulling the starters at the right time, instead of, “One more inning....ok, bases loaded, better warm someone...boy, that ball went a long way, welp, time to pull ‘im.”

Hyperbole? Perhaps a wee bit, but only a wee bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Philip said:

I’ll vote for Hyde when he starts pulling the starters at the right time, instead of, “One more inning....ok, bases loaded, better warm someone...boy, that ball went a long way, welp, time to pull ‘im.”

Hyperbole? Perhaps a wee bit, but only a wee bit.

You keep beating this horse but I don’t think I’ve seen any data on your end to support it.

Orioles starters have gone 4.4IP per start which is below the league average and in the bottom 3rd of the league. Even in a shortened season with expanded rosters, it’s not a great idea to expect the bullpen to go 4+ innings every night. Everyone would like Hyde to know exactly when his pitchers have had it and pull them accordingly, but it clearly isn’t that easy. And even then, he may know and be weighing the fact that the bullpen is tired or will be tired after playing 4 more games in a row. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, survivedc said:

You keep beating this horse but I don’t think I’ve seen any data on your end to support it.

Orioles starters have gone 4.4IP per start which is below the league average and in the bottom 3rd of the league. Even in a shortened season with expanded rosters, it’s not a great idea to expect the bullpen to go 4+ innings every night. Everyone would like Hyde to know exactly when his pitchers have had it and pull them accordingly, but it clearly isn’t that easy. And even then, he may know and be weighing the fact that the bullpen is tired or will be tired after playing 4 more games in a row. 

You are suggesting that I’m referring to an innings limit, and I’m not. I’m talking about the starter showing himself to either be fatigued or otherwise ineffective, the manager needs to plan for that so that the situation does not get any worse. Also the manager should not let him come out again after he’s had a turbulent anything that doesn’t result in any runs.
We should expect 5+ innings from our starters, but Hyde of All people knows the warning signs, and should be proactive, but he isn't. I’m not saying it’s easy, but it’s not impossible. And it’s certainly not THAT difficult. For instance. We have a waiver claim starting tonight. Hyde knows how many pitches/innings he can reasonably expect. Let’s say 60 pitches. If Lopez goes a scoreless but labored three innings at 60 pitches, it would be ok to let him start the fourth, but have someone ready in case he continues to have long ABs, because another 20 pitch inning insures he’s not coming back out for the fifth, and long ABs means he’s not putting anyone away, and the balls that are being fouled off will eventually get solid contact.

That would be a reasonable scenario. My complaint is that Hyde almost never acts proactively. Despite knowing those warning signs, and knowing the most he can reasonably expect, he waits too long before even getting someone warmed. And remember he has two extra relievers, including a couple long men.

Another scenario: Lopez gives up three first-inning runs on 10 pitches. That won’t change my pitch limit, and I won’t get anyone up early. Sometimes guys have slow starts. So it is a balancing act, but I wouldn’t be complaining if Hyde didn’t consistently have a late hook.

I wrote more, but let’s see what happens with Lopez. I’m very excited about the game tonight, and I hope Lopez does well, regardless of his pitch count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, survivedc said:

You keep beating this horse but I don’t think I’ve seen any data on your end to support it.

Orioles starters have gone 4.4IP per start which is below the league average and in the bottom 3rd of the league. Even in a shortened season with expanded rosters, it’s not a great idea to expect the bullpen to go 4+ innings every night. Everyone would like Hyde to know exactly when his pitchers have had it and pull them accordingly, but it clearly isn’t that easy. And even then, he may know and be weighing the fact that the bullpen is tired or will be tired after playing 4 more games in a row. 

I will say, that the average you mention is for the season, and includes guys that are no longer on the team, I think it’s more accurate to look at the starters pitch count at the beginning of the fourth and fifth innings, and see how many of them failed to finish the inning, and left with men on base. My point is that in an effort to get an extra inning out of his starter, Hyde allowed a risky situation. Hyde knows his pitchers’ optimum pitch range, And we are of course not privy to that information, but it sure looks like he goes beyond that range to our cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Philip said:

I will say, that the average you mention is for the season, and includes guys that are no longer on the team, I think it’s more accurate to look at the starters pitch count at the beginning of the fourth and fifth innings, and see how many of them failed to finish the inning, and left with men on base. My point is that in an effort to get an extra inning out of his starter, Hyde allowed a risky situation. Hyde knows his pitchers’ optimum pitch range, And we are of course not privy to that information, but it sure looks like he goes beyond that range to our cost.

I don’t really see it.    I feel like I’ve heard this about every manager we’ve had since Davey Johnson.   You have to balance maximizing the chance of winning one individual ballgame vs. keeping your bullpen guys healthy and not overworked.    As I’ve said before, it’s a little easier to call on the pen earlier this year due to larger rosters.   But overall I don’t have a problem with Hyde’s balancing of today’s game vs. the bigger picture.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Philip said:

I will say, that the average you mention is for the season, and includes guys that are no longer on the team, I think it’s more accurate to look at the starters pitch count at the beginning of the fourth and fifth innings, and see how many of them failed to finish the inning, and left with men on base. My point is that in an effort to get an extra inning out of his starter, Hyde allowed a risky situation. Hyde knows his pitchers’ optimum pitch range, And we are of course not privy to that information, but it sure looks like he goes beyond that range to our cost.

My point is that I want YOU to look at their pitch counts in those innings and show that your hunch is correct. 
 

Asher W, for example, by ERA our worst starter (we’ll give Means a pass) has gone 5 innings 4 times, giving up 4, 3, 2 and 3 runs. The 4 in his first start is the most he’s given up.
Maybe there are examples of pitchers doing worse, and some sort of pattern to go along with it, but I’d like to see some evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, survivedc said:

My point is that I want YOU to look at their pitch counts in those innings and show that your hunch is correct. 
 

Asher W, for example, by ERA our worst starter (we’ll give Means a pass) has gone 5 innings 4 times, giving up 4, 3, 2 and 3 runs. The 4 in his first start is the most he’s given up.
Maybe there are examples of pitchers doing worse, and some sort of pattern to go along with it, but I’d like to see some evidence.

Fair question. How many times did he struggle into his final inning(warning sign) start the next inning poorly, with no one warming, and leave with runners on. That’s my beef, and I can check his starts and tell you.

but after the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

o

 

88% of the Outs that Means recorded (15 out of 17) came via the Strikeout and the Groundout. 

Means' ERA went down from 5.63 to 5.02, his WHIP went down from 1.188 to 1.088, and OBA went down from .256 to .241. 

 

 

17 OUTS: )  12 Strikeouts, 3 Groundouts, 1 Popout, 1 Picked Off of 1st Base                      

 

 

JOHALAMEANS )))))) (vs. DEVIL RAYS, 9/20)

IP:ll5.67

H:llll.3 ) l(1 Home Run, 2 Singles)

R:llll 1

BB:ll0 ) *

SO:l12

Pitches: l) 97 )(68 )Strikes, )29 )Balls)

2020 ERA: l) 5.02 )  37.67 IP  (21 ER) 

2020 WHIP: l)  1.088  )  37.67 IP  (41 H/BB) 

2020 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: l)  .241  )(35 for 145)   

 

* )) Means had 1 Hit Batsman

 

PITCHES BY INNING  

*******************  

16  ll(11 llStrikes, lll.Balls)

16  lll(10 llStrikes, llll.Balls)

16  lll(10 llStrikes, ll.llBalls)

23  lll(19 llStrikes, lllllBalls)

15  lll(11 llStrikes, lllllBalls)

11  lll(71 lStrikes, ll.llBalls) ) *

 

* )) Means recorded 2 Outs before departing in the 6th inning

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can’t find the thread, but three starts ago someone was wondering if Means could get his ERA down below 5 by the end of the year, and I was saying that would be extremely difficult.    He’s now at 5.02, and if he gets his next out without allowing a run his ERA will be below 5.    What a strong finish he’s having — hopefully he can put together one more strong start and end the season on a very high note.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

I can’t find the thread, but three starts ago someone was wondering if Means could get his ERA down below 5 by the end of the year, and I was saying that would be extremely difficult. Hes now at 5.02, and if he gets his next out without allowing a run his ERA will be below 5. What a strong finish hes having — hopefully, he can put together one more strong start and end the season on a very high note.   

 

o

 

I think that this is the one ........

 

 

On 9/9/2020 at 12:17 AM, BohKnowsBmore said:

 

Nice to see Means right the ship a bit. His ERA is still not good at 6.58, but his WHIP is a very respectable 1.23 (he finished 2019 at 1.14.) If he can get his ERA in the high 4's by year's end, that would be amazing, considering how much of an impact that first game against the Yanks undoubtedly has.

 

 

 

On 9/9/2020 at 4:58 AM, Frobby said:

 

It would not be that hard to do, considering how few innings hes thrown (26.) Assume that he gets four more starts and throws 22 IP (5.5/game), If he allowed 7 ER in that span (2.86 ERA for those four games), that would take his ERA to  4.88 ...... so it will be difficult, but not impossible.

 

 

 

 

o

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Means era 5.02still not good but that whip of 1.088 is very impressive.  The numbers don’t reflect the improvement in stuff an actually I am more confident in him after this year because of the uptick in fastball.  He went from possible back end of the rotation guy to a two or three on a contending team.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Kind of frustrating how well Boston has played this year given expectations. And they always seem to have a good farm. 
    • With 2.5 years of control I can't believe the Marlins will shop him for dimes on the dollar. 
    • Luzardo has certainly experienced a down year compared to 2023. He has had some injuries (and currently on IL with a lumbar issue) and his statcast data is worse. The walk rate is still good but the K rate has dropped big time.  He is still missing bats but players aren’t chasing as much. I still think this is a guy that is and will be on the O’s radar, provided that they are comfortable with the medicals. They still would have him for 2 more years as well and he doesn’t turn 27 until the end of September, so you basically will have him for what are historically his peak years. Miami has said they aren’t trading him but I’m not sure I buy that. Outside of 2023, he has had his share of injury issues and he’s a big risk to acquire but he’s also a big risk to keep. The question is, what will Miami need for him to decide to move him?  Right now, his value is obviously way down. If you are Miami do you keep him and hope he gets back healthy, finishes strong and then you trade him for more  in the offseason than you likely can get now or do you cut your losses, get 70ish cents on the dollar and make sure you get something of value? If the Os were to put a deal of Norby, Stowers, Beavers, Tavera and Urias on the table for Luzardo and Nardi, would Miami turn that down?  Would they get a better offer? I think both answers to those questions are maybe. I think he’s a tough one to gauge but the team control and the fact that he is left handed is huge. Get him with our coaches and our program and on a real baseball team and things could be different for him..change of scenery type thing. I was luke warm on acquiring him before because I was worried about his health but if we can get him without trading our absolute best assets, that makes him even make intriguing. Add in getting Nardi and I think this is a package that could help the Os a lot. Its a risk and it certainly hurts some of your depth but it also opens up a door for Mayo and eventually Holliday and it keeps your absolute best prospects here.
    • I would not be surprised to see Boston finishing 2nd in the AL East this season with the Yanks 3rd
    • The O’s will play MLB games in a MiLB ballpark next year.  For those who are thinking “road trip!”, consider this about Sacramento.  While announcers were raving about the weather in Oakland this past weekend, in Sacramento July 5, 6 & 7 daily highs were 108, 110 & 106.  I would imagine day games will be limited.  
    • The Semien pick and the Holmes pick seem to be the two biggest reaches which is interesting since neither were the only rep for their team so there isn't even that logic there.  Josh Smith or Jordan Westburg should have been over Semien (I know they are both primary 3B, but either could play 2B for a couple innings) and Kimbrel of Jansen over Holmes. 
    • Must be fWAR because Westburg has 2.8 rWAR to Semien’s 2.3. And he’s only played 5 less games than Semien. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...