Jump to content

Orioles Lose Zach Pop and Grey Fenter in Rule Five


weams

Recommended Posts

Listened to an interview with Scott McGregor today.   He said that the O's Analytic department did not like Zach Pop throwing the power sinker.  He called it a Jim Johnson power sinker.  So they told him to not throw the sinker and instead throw the four steamer.

So I am thinking that this had to be before the arm troubles.   And when he is recovering they don't protect him from the Rule 5 because they do not think his arm will not hold up throwing his best pitch the power sinker.    Is that a good guess?  The sinker can be very effective but also pretty hard of the arm.  Johnson did well with it for a while then he had trouble.

https://pressboxonline.com/2021/03/16/talking-baseball-with-former-orioles-lhp-scott-mcgregor/

Scroll to 33.20

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think it has more to do with the O's not valuing someone who relies on a 2 seam fastball as much as someone who uses the 4 seamer.

I've don't recall seeing any evidence that the 2 seam fastball is harder on the arm.

Grip doesn't matter but he may pronate his arm differently.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Listened to an interview with Scott McGregor today.   He said that the O's Analytic department did not like Zach Pop throwing the power sinker.  He called it a Jim Johnson power sinker.  So they told him to not throw the sinker and instead throw the four steamer.

So I am thinking that this had to be before the arm troubles.   And when he is recovering they don't protect him from the Rule 5 because they do not think his arm will not hold up throwing his best pitch the power sinker.    Is that a good guess?  The sinker can be very effective but also pretty hard of the arm.  Johnson did well with it for a while then he had trouble.

https://pressboxonline.com/2021/03/16/talking-baseball-with-former-orioles-lhp-scott-mcgregor/

Scroll to 33.20

Yes, that was a very interesting comment. They did something similar to Brenan Hanifee and we saw the terrible year he had 2019 after looking like a breakout guy in 2018. 

They certainly seems to be looking for a very particular type of pitchers with the high spin 4-seam fastballs, but I still think guys with good sinkers that get ground balls can be good as well. 

It seems like they basically were willing to risk losing Pop because he doesn't fit the mold they are looking for and it will be very interesting to follow this line of thinking and see how successful these guys are in the big leagues and who go to other teams and find success.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do you trade him at 25 or do you extend him?  Franco at 28 is probably more valuable than what you got back.

I think it would depend on the money which assuming he's elite (or the conversation we're having is pointless) would be 300 million or higher then I think you have to trade him. I would look at it a little differently if I could afford one guy at elite $ and the majority of my team is cheap. But, they will begin to be expensive as they go through arbitration. If he's elite and two years away from FA, I don't see him signing below market. I think it also depends on what you have as a replacement. In this scenario I am assuming since my system is cray loaded due to previous trades and smart PD that I have a replacement that gets me within 2-3 wins or the pieces to get one. Then obviously the return. If you can get 4 prospects, 1 top 25 another top 100, then I think I would trade him. Paying one player that much money rarely works out for small to mid-market teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

 

Pop was 96-98 last night though he did give up three hard hits (two were actual hits) in his one inning of work. Statcast classified his fastball as a 2-seamer with an average of 2427 spin.

I doubt an arm like that is returned.

If someone asked me who would I rather have, Pop or Tyler Wells. I'd take Pop today and twice on Sunday. 

It appears Elias made a mistake here in leaving Pop unprotected while protecting Goudeau (who he already DFA'd and lost), Lakins and a 31-year old Sulser.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

Pop was 96-98 last night though he did give up three hard hits (two were actual hits) in his one inning of work. Statcast classified his fastball as a 2-seamer with an average of 2427 spin.

I doubt an arm like that is returned.

If someone asked me who would I rather have, Pop or Tyler Wells. I'd take Pop today and twice on Sunday. 

It appears Elias made a mistake here in leaving Pop unprotected while protecting Goudeau (who he already DFA'd and lost), Lakins and a 31-year old Sulser.

Have to agree.    I didn’t scream about it at the time because I didn’t know how Pop’s rehab was going or much about the Rule 5 crop available, but I wasn’t comfortable with the decision then and now it looks pretty foolish.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Pop was 96-98 last night though he did give up three hard hits (two were actual hits) in his one inning of work. Statcast classified his fastball as a 2-seamer with an average of 2427 spin.

I doubt an arm like that is returned.

If someone asked me who would I rather have, Pop or Tyler Wells. I'd take Pop today and twice on Sunday. 

It appears Elias made a mistake here in leaving Pop unprotected while protecting Goudeau (who he already DFA'd and lost), Lakins and a 31-year old Sulser.

Your last paragraph is the key.  The stupidity to keep those guys over Pop is amazing to me.  Elias hasn’t made many mistakes but that one was just flat out dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
    • Let's go Tampa! Actually, I'm fired up for the offseason.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...