Jump to content

Trade Bait 2021


ScGO's

Recommended Posts

On 6/12/2021 at 3:28 PM, bpilktree said:

His defensive war is 16th among qualified shortstops which isn’t great but he has committed only 3 errors which is near the best in baseball.  Andrus is dead last in defensive War and committed 9 errors.  Galvis doesn’t have the best range but he doesn’t make errors to balls he gets too.  He is still a big upgrade for them and also would not cost much in salary.  

Galvis' lack of a strong arm seems like a big negative for a SS - especially coupled with below average range.  I'm in the camp that believes he has very little trade value.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Brewed just traded for first baseman Rowdy Tellez from Toronto.  
 

Tellez has been very up and down but does have upside.  It could prevent them from getting into the bidding for Trey.

This kind of reminds me of when Duquette got Trumbo early so as not to be over a barrel with Davis.   Tellez could flop, but Brewers probably were the only roster outside AL East where the Mancini/Aguilar/Cron/Tellez type guy was more of a need than the Red Sox/Rays have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Matt Bennett said:

Sell Trades in the Elias Era:

1. Dylan Bundy - 27 year old top prospect disappointment with 2 years of control left

2. Jonathan Villar - 29 year old sell high but salary dump trade with 1 year of control left

3. Andrew Cashner - clear veteran stopgap rental, 2 months of control left

4. Richard Belier - 33 year old crafty middle reliever with 2.5 years of control left

5. Miguel Castro - 25 year old middle reliever with lively arm and 2.5 years of control left

6. Mychal Givens - 30 year old pricey back end reliever with 1.5 years of control left

7. Tommy Milone - clear veteran stopgap rental with 2 months of control left

8. Jose Iglesias - a fine but replaceable player, sell high with 1 year of control left

9. Alex Cobb - salary dump of a bust of a contract, 1 year left of control

So Elias hasn't traded anyone of value that hasn't hit arbitration at least once. I'm not saying he isn't willing to, but you would think the cost-cutting and tearing down would reduce as we get into the 3rd and 4th years of the Elias rebuild. The young players with talent and proven results at the big league level would be exactly the players you would want to accumulate.

Franco, Harvey, and Valaika will be lucky to be on the roster come September. Galvis wouldn't get anything really even healthy but he would probably be a smart resign as it doesn't look like any of the Richie Martin, Cadyn Grenier, Joey Ortiz, Terin Vavra, Mason McCoy crowd will be beating down the MLB door from AAA by the end of the season. Severino, Armstrong, Plutko, and Jorge Lopez (although I'm sure he would do well in a bullpen role) look like non-tenders. It wouldn't make much sense to sell a recovering Santander.

John Means, Paul Fry, and Tanner Scott are all about to hit arbitration but trading any of them would be the most control Elias has given up. And none of their value is exactly high right now. Mancini has a good bat but is not a GREAT player and means more to the franchise than any middling prospect he would bring back.

It may be disappointing but my prediction is that no-one of significance will be traded at the deadline.

I wouldn't be too disappointed if there were no significant trades. I just don't think there's much trade value there, outside of the guys I think should be retained (Mullins, Hays, Mountcastle, Means, Scott, Tate, some other young pitchers). I agree with you on Mancini. Santander might have had value if he he'd had a strong or even solid year, but I think it's too late for that -- maybe in the off-season. I could see Fry bringing back something of value from a contender desperate for a LHed reliever. 

I agree, and think I've said before, that Galvis might be back next year, probably at a similar salary ($1.5 mm). He's been much better than I had expected, but planning on making a 32-year-old with limited range the regular SS would tell us something about the team's aspirations for improvement in 2022.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points. I think Mancini is dealt though. One, he just has to. Two, we have a glut of OF and Nevin, that can rotate through DH. Fry and Sulser could go. 
 

I think it’s going to be a pretty boring deadline for us. The Galvis injury hurt a sure fire trade. Means was going to bring some serious rumors. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

If Means can get a start or two he could be dealt but it seems to me that we’d be better off waiting until the offseason now

I think of they end up dealing Means then the window for competing will probably be 2023 or '24. Might be that far off anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/7/2021 at 9:56 AM, Matt Bennett said:

Sell Trades in the Elias Era:

1. Dylan Bundy - 27 year old top prospect disappointment with 2 years of control left

2. Jonathan Villar - 29 year old sell high but salary dump trade with 1 year of control left

3. Andrew Cashner - clear veteran stopgap rental, 2 months of control left

4. Richard Belier - 33 year old crafty middle reliever with 2.5 years of control left

5. Miguel Castro - 25 year old middle reliever with lively arm and 2.5 years of control left

6. Mychal Givens - 30 year old pricey back end reliever with 1.5 years of control left

7. Tommy Milone - clear veteran stopgap rental with 2 months of control left

8. Jose Iglesias - a fine but replaceable player, sell high with 1 year of control left

9. Alex Cobb - salary dump of a bust of a contract, 1 year left of control

So Elias hasn't traded anyone of value that hasn't hit arbitration at least once. I'm not saying he isn't willing to, but you would think the cost-cutting and tearing down would reduce as we get into the 3rd and 4th years of the Elias rebuild. The young players with talent and proven results at the big league level would be exactly the players you would want to accumulate.

Franco, Harvey, and Valaika will be lucky to be on the roster come September. Galvis wouldn't get anything really even healthy but he would probably be a smart resign as it doesn't look like any of the Richie Martin, Cadyn Grenier, Joey Ortiz, Terin Vavra, Mason McCoy crowd will be beating down the MLB door from AAA by the end of the season. Severino, Armstrong, Plutko, and Jorge Lopez (although I'm sure he would do well in a bullpen role) look like non-tenders. It wouldn't make much sense to sell a recovering Santander.

John Means, Paul Fry, and Tanner Scott are all about to hit arbitration but trading any of them would be the most control Elias has given up. And none of their value is exactly high right now. Mancini has a good bat but is not a GREAT player and means more to the franchise than any middling prospect he would bring back.

It may be disappointing but my prediction is that no-one of significance will be traded at the deadline.

Good post. It's a tough deadline to call right now for Elias based on his history so far. I do think Mancini could potentially bring back more than a middling prospect considering both that teams might be desperate for a MOO bat and Elias' ask will be high. 

That said, I could see Elias dealing Means with these recurrent shoulder issues and cleaning up on that trade. It would suck a lot, but hey. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, we will see.  The most likely guys to be traded are members of the pen and Mancini.  Those guys have struggled as of late but they have also been good for a lot of the year and have track records of being good.  There are 15 games left before the deadline, so if any of them start to get hot and play well, the value will be right back.

I also think we overestimate how much value is lost by a bad/mediocre  stretch of games.  These guys all have track records and been around for a while.  Teams know what they are.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It's a foregone conclusion that they will blow a 4 game lead in the span of 6 games? 
    • 100%! I say abolish divisions, play a fully balanced schedule and take the top 4 or 6 or 8 or whatever teams in each league to the playoffs. 
    • The question was asked, a few months ago, whether winning the division was necessary. A lively debate resulted, some saying the division didn’t matter(“just make the playoffs and anything can happen”) and some taking the opposite view. I wanted the Division and I’m disgusted the play has been so bad. And I haaaate the Yankees( sports hate. I’m sure they are all great guys in person.) It will not magically improve, and I despair of winning more than two more games…not even 90 wins. And in a Homer–prone park, how many homers will the Os give up? The thought is not comforting. And there’s little reason to think things will improve against the Tigers or Royals. But at least: 1) next year they will hopefully have Bautista and the position players healthy. 2) The farm has very few MLB-ready players so there won’t be so much bouncing back and forth. Hopefully the guys can settle in and just play. 3) the Os will be looking for a fourth consecutive winning season, which hasn’t happened since the 70s So there’s that…
    • I was about to post a similar thread, but despite my memory issues, I recalled this thread.  I still find myself enjoying sports less and less.  The issue is not my teams, but myself.  It's a sad reality that I'm bothered when my team doesn't win, or does win, but wins in a way that is not how I wanted them to!  LOL!  It's ridiculous.  Frankly, I'm somewhat ashamed. The O's are very likely going to the playoffs.  But instead of being happy about that, I'm more concerned with how awful we've been and how little I expect from them as the post-season draws near.  A real fan loves his team and sticks with them, through thick and thin.  It's absolutely okay to be critical, even frustrated, at times, but when those are the default and dominant expressions, it makes me feel... less than.  It's like this with all my favorite teams (O's/Ravens/Terps).  It's therapeutic, in a way, to reveal such truths.  But the quest to find a way to enjoy sports again, to enjoy what my teams are doing, is a process that is taking longer than I'd hoped.  
    • I wouldn’t say I’m fired up.  I’d like to do enough to (1) win the season series (which only takes one win), (2) clinch a playoff spot (which probably only takes one win, depending what other teams do, and (3) improves our chances of getting the no. 4 seed (which might take a couple of wins, depending how other teams do).   
    • It feels like a foregone conclusion that the O’s sneak in with the third wild card spot and then lose the wild card series. So it just doesn’t really matter all that much what happens from here on out.    Then again, get hot at the right time and this could still be a World Series contender. I have to see some fire in this team before I entertain that thought though.
    • I am not really fired up per se.  I am just hoping that something happens that is different than what we have seen for months.  A late comeback to win the game.  A big inning of 4 runs or more.  Some big hits from Adley or Holliday.   1 win means we win the season series against everyone in the East for the second year in a row.  That would be great.  And even if we lose, I am hoping that watching the Yankees celebrate in front of them and the fans celebrate around them fires them up.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...