Jump to content

Cobb to Angels


Yardball85

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, NCRaven said:

Unless a signing proves otherwise, Elias and Hyde do not prefer Franco over Ruiz.  I do not believe that Elias is either stupid or lazy, despite your constantly using those terms.  Instead, he's made a considered opinion not to waste resources on a very marginal upgrade at 3B.  Galvis was necessary as we had no realistic alternative at SS.  As of now at least, Franco has been deemed unnecessary for this team at this point in the rebuild.

They did have an alternative but they traded him away to save a few bucks and get a prospect they could have just drafted themselves if they were as high on them as they say.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

Unless a signing proves otherwise, Elias and Hyde do not prefer Franco over Ruiz.  I do not believe that Elias is either stupid or lazy, despite your constantly using those terms.  Instead, he's made a considered opinion not to waste resources on a very marginal upgrade at 3B.  Galvis was necessary as we had no realistic alternative at SS.  As of now at least, Franco has been deemed unnecessary for this team at this point in the rebuild.

 

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

They did have an alternative but they traded him away to save a few bucks and get a prospect they could have just drafted themselves if they were as high on them as they say.

And they have Martin.  Reports were he would be back in early March and they were trying to get him all offseason before Martin got hurt.  Third base was/is as big a hole as SS.

And it's absolutely dumb and lazy to keep running out Ruiz at third.  They are taking the easy, cheap way out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Would Brad Miller or Marwin Gonzalez be that bad? Too expensive? Better than Franco at least, right?

(I've not done homework here, so be gentle.)

They could work too.

Doesnt have to be Franco.  Just want someone better, especially defensively with the young staff we will have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a fan, I think the best part of the trade is that it indicates the O's will likely play more of their talented young pitchers in Baltimore.  I'm not really excited about Jones - figuring he'll be somewhere between 20 and 25 on their prospect list - but he's certainly better than what I predicted.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They could work too.

Doesnt have to be Franco.  Just want someone better, especially defensively with the young staff we will have.

Why do you think a Maikel Franco in an Orioles uniform in 2021 will help the Orioles compete when Mike Elias wants to in a couple years? 

Ruiz took a step forward in the power department last year and I’d rather not spend an extra couple million and see if Ruiz can do it again. 

Since 2nd half of 2019 for Rio Ruiz:

.224/.293/.442. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

They did have an alternative but they traded him away to save a few bucks and get a prospect they could have just drafted themselves if they were as high on them as they say.

They didn't have an alternative when they signed Galvis.  Iglesias had already been traded.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt Bennett said:

Why do you think a Maikel Franco in an Orioles uniform in 2021 will help the Orioles compete when Mike Elias wants to in a couple years? 

Ruiz took a step forward in the power department last year and I’d rather not spend an extra couple million and see if Ruiz can do it again. 

Since 2nd half of 2019 for Rio Ruiz:

.224/.293/.442. 

 

 

I didn’t say anything about competing.  It’s pretty obvious I don’t expect them to compete.  Just a desire for an upgrade.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

They did have an alternative but they traded him away to save a few bucks and get a prospect they could have just drafted themselves if they were as high on them as they say.

But now they have the guy they drafted AND the guy they could have drafted. And a similar veteran SS for less money who could ALSO bring them another prospect at the deadline. There's nothing about this move that isn't smart for where the O's are right now. Iglesias was fun but he was barely on the field and his offense was highly flukey. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

They did have an alternative but they traded him away to save a few bucks and get a prospect they could have just drafted themselves if they were as high on them as they say.

It would have cost 1.1m signing bonus at draft time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Philip said:

Re: Santander. Considering he was a rule five pick up, I would be delighted if he could put up two or three WAR for the next couple years. He’s certainly better than our other RF options. I hope Diaz will be better, but that definitely remains to be seen.

I'm lost concerning your fundamental lack of basic logic.

If:

It remains to be seen if Diaz is better

how can:

Santander be certainly better than our other RF options?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm lost concerning your fundamental lack of basic logic.

If:

It remains to be seen if Diaz is better

how can:

Santander be certainly better than our other RF options?

 

 

 

What do you think the odds are that Diaz will be better (1) this year, or (2) ever?   In (2), I mean will Diaz ever be better than Santander is now.

My answers: (1) 10% and (2) 33%.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

What do you think the odds are that Diaz will be better (1) this year, or (2) ever?   In (2), I mean will Diaz ever be better than Santander is now.

My answers: (1) 10% and (2) 33%.

 

I'd go a bit higher but that seems reasonable. 

My point is that 33 or even 10 percent means it isn't certain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • 100%! I say abolish divisions, play a fully balanced schedule and take the top 4 or 6 or 8 or whatever teams in each league to the playoffs. 
    • The question was asked, a few months ago, whether winning the division was necessary. A lively debate resulted, some saying the division didn’t matter(“just make the playoffs and anything can happen”) and some taking the opposite view. I wanted the Division and I’m disgusted the play has been so bad. And I haaaate the Yankees( sports hate. I’m sure they are all great guys in person.) It will not magically improve, and I despair of winning more than two more games…not even 90 wins. And in a Homer–prone park, how many homers will the Os give up? The thought is not comforting. And there’s little reason to think things will improve against the Tigers or Royals. But at least: 1) next year they will hopefully have Bautista and the position players healthy. 2) The farm has very few MLB-ready players so there won’t be so much bouncing back and forth. Hopefully the guys can settle in and just play. 3) the Os will be looking for a fourth consecutive winning season, which hasn’t happened since the 70s So there’s that…
    • I was about to post a similar thread, but despite my memory issues, I recalled this thread.  I still find myself enjoying sports less and less.  The issue is not my teams, but myself.  It's a sad reality that I'm bothered when my team doesn't win, or does win, but wins in a way that is not how I wanted them to!  LOL!  It's ridiculous.  Frankly, I'm somewhat ashamed. The O's are very likely going to the playoffs.  But instead of being happy about that, I'm more concerned with how awful we've been and how little I expect from them as the post-season draws near.  A real fan loves his team and sticks with them, through thick and thin.  It's absolutely okay to be critical, even frustrated, at times, but when those are the default and dominant expressions, it makes me feel... less than.  It's like this with all my favorite teams (O's/Ravens/Terps).  It's therapeutic, in a way, to reveal such truths.  But the quest to find a way to enjoy sports again, to enjoy what my teams are doing, is a process that is taking longer than I'd hoped.  
    • I wouldn’t say I’m fired up.  I’d like to do enough to (1) win the season series (which only takes one win), (2) clinch a playoff spot (which probably only takes one win, depending what other teams do, and (3) improves our chances of getting the no. 4 seed (which might take a couple of wins, depending how other teams do).   
    • It feels like a foregone conclusion that the O’s sneak in with the third wild card spot and then lose the wild card series. So it just doesn’t really matter all that much what happens from here on out.    Then again, get hot at the right time and this could still be a World Series contender. I have to see some fire in this team before I entertain that thought though.
    • I am not really fired up per se.  I am just hoping that something happens that is different than what we have seen for months.  A late comeback to win the game.  A big inning of 4 runs or more.  Some big hits from Adley or Holliday.   1 win means we win the season series against everyone in the East for the second year in a row.  That would be great.  And even if we lose, I am hoping that watching the Yankees celebrate in front of them and the fans celebrate around them fires them up.   
    • I feel like I asked once years ago, but can someone please explain the acronym “MFY?”
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...