Jump to content

Is this team bad enough for the number 1 pick?


Greenpastures23

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, now said:

good catch... forgot about that Rocker! 
PS Which one (of the 2021 versions) would you choose?

I have no idea whatsoever.  Are they related to the old Leiter and Rocker?  If the new ones walked into a room I wouldn't be able to tell them from a lacrosse player or a curling star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I have no idea whatsoever.  Are they related to the old Leiter and Rocker?  If the new ones walked into a room I wouldn't be able to tell them from a lacrosse player or a curling star.

Jack is Al's son.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Picks like Kjerstad should and will get you fired. 

Elias has done WORLDS for our player development and pretty much every aspect of our team but that pick was questionable at best. Was disappointed when it happened, before the injury (and again, I fully understand the underslot strategy). It reminded me of Joe Jordan picks, just glad I didn't hear him described as "toolsy". Regardless, MUCH more good than bad for Elias and his tenure but he should get criticism just like anyone else. 

Edited by NelsonCruuuuuz
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Picks like Kjerstad should and will get you fired. 

The book on Kjerstad hasn't even started yet. Are we blaming Elias because he got myocarditis? What if Kjerstad becomes a perennial 40 home run hitter? You can not like the pick if you want but this post is way premature. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

The book on Kjerstad hasn't even started yet. Are we blaming Elias because he got myocarditis? What if Kjerstad becomes a perennial 40 home run hitter? You can not like the pick if you want but this post is way premature. 

If you're online with no insight into the strategic management, scouting and other aspects of the team and no influence into the team's decision making it's your duty to call all controversial decisions firing offenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, glenn__davis said:

The book on Kjerstad hasn't even started yet. Are we blaming Elias because he got myocarditis? What if Kjerstad becomes a perennial 40 home run hitter? You can not like the pick if you want but this post is way premature. 

You can hit 40 hr and not be valuable.

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

The book on Kjerstad hasn't even started yet. Are we blaming Elias because he got myocarditis? What if Kjerstad becomes a perennial 40 home run hitter? You can not like the pick if you want but this post is way premature. 

I can only personally speak for myself but :

1. I don’t think anyone is “blaming” Elias for myocarditis. That obviously is a straw man. Some have questioned the amount of research/in depth research done with him personally beyond metrics/stats.  I think that’s a fair question. 
 

2. I think in a town where the football team’s greatness was built upon drafting the BPA (and I get it, different sport, different draft strategies) AND you put a putrid product on the field while trading away anyone of value….perhaps you should take the BPA and not get too cute. Looks bad from a PR standpoint IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given our current roster construction, I'm fine losing games as long as our core players are improving. There is no miracle run in this team, so I'd just assume get another top 5 pick in '22. I'm surprised at all the blowback on the '20 draft class. Westburg has been everything we could have hoped for. Haskin is doing very nicely. But the three picks that will define the decision to skip Martin (Kjerstad, Mayo, Baumler) haven't even played a game yet. It will be at least three years until we can even think of grading our class.....we just don't know what we have. In the meantime, our ML rotation is currently lousy after Means. We had to expect Akin, Kremer, Lowther, Zimmerman would experience growing pains adjusting to the majors. The hope is that one or two of them figure it out and become reliable arms for the back end of the rotation. The Rodriguez/Hall/Baumann/Bradish group is getting closer. That's the group that will determine our fate, not the present young arms that are struggling. The second half of the season will be worth critiquing and a lot more fun because we'll see something closer to our future composition. But Elias did not work the offseason to make this a competitive team. We're not as bad as our 17-29 record, but we are simply a bad team....until our young arms change the equation. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're a little past the first quarter into the season.

We're in last place and we'll most likely stay there.  I don't see us surpassing Toronto.

As it stands right now, the competition for the #1 pick are the Twins, Tigers, Angels, Nats, Pirates, Rockies, Diamondbacks and maybe the Reds.

Of that group, I think the Rockies and Pirates are the worst, and that's based on nothing but my gut.  I'm not actively comping our rosters or anything.  I think that the Twins, Angels, Nats and maybe the Diamondbacks are better than us, but not by a lot.  

There's a long way to go, however I think we should be picking anywhere from 3rd to 5th next year.  I could see us winding up with the #1 pick but we're not a shoe-in like we were for the 2019 draft.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Let's be honest, Gunnar ain't finishing second either.
    • Yeah, I don't think the Orioles' struggles against NL teams is very meaningful, but I do think the NL is stronger this year.  All the NL division leaders have looked formidable and steady throughout the season.  But also the Padres and Mets have kicked their seasons into another gear and have really impressed over the past couple of months.  Compare them to the Wild Card teams in the AL, and they just appear more formidable on paper.   Also the DBacks are pretty much outhitting everyone right now -- though that's been offset by their not so effective pitching.  
    • For sure he is out of consideration as the MVP favorite to copy Cal.  Of course,  Cal didn't have an Aaron Judge to compete with.  The runner-up in MVP voting in 1983 was a guy named Eddie Murray.  Eddie had more HR, more RBI, a higher slugging and OPS than Cal, but Cal had a higher WAR and batting average (.318 to .303).  I wonder if Eddie is bitter about losing the MVP to Cal?  A case could be made for either one. 
    • Going to lookup splits before/after AS break for 2024, but my gut tells me the O’s faltered against the NL Central division the last two years. Let’s see how October plays out!
    • I've heard folks I trust a lot here report on him as being good but on a gut level those plays bugged me too. I think Holliday is sufficient alone as a 5th infielder as a playoff roster gets configured, and believe in series you get injury replacements if Urias re-rolls the ankle or Gunnar breaks somebody else's arm.    Rivera and Soto are kind of both about that speed. From comments we know Urias, Westburg, Mountcastle the probable return order, but TBD on the Rivera, Soto, Eloy departures.    I think there's some value to Coby Mayo staying around even if he just watches ala '70 Grich "did not play in series".
    • He missed a cycle by inches on one of the doubles.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...