Jump to content

O’s sign Jordan Lyles


LookinUp

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I give it a greater than 0% chance that he pitches well enough that the O's flip the contract to another team

I do not:

19 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

5.49 FIP, 1.43 WHIP, 9.9 H/9, and 1.9 HR/9 over his 2 years in Texas.

He's going to get absolutely NUKED in the AL East.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I mean, innings and taking the ball every 5th day was definitely addressed.

Of course, the quality of those innings is also part of that.  Still, if he can give us a 5ish ERA and throw even 170 innings in 2022, they will have gotten some level of value out of him.

7 IP and 4 runs allowed is a 5.14 ERA.  A QS is a 4.5 ERA.  You take either of those starts every time.  That keeps you in the game most of the time.

If he keeps us in games 75% of the time he goes out there, that’s fine.  

I agree if you squint you can see some value here I just think $7M is a lot for this level of production. Straily and Tommy Milone had pretty similar resumes and we got them on minor league deals. Lyles career WAR is under 0, we should not have to pay $7M for that. Granted $7M is not the end of the world. I guess the best argument here is that this is an investment to help protect the developing arms in the bullpen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This more than doubles the previous record for a FA contract given out by Elias.   Yeah it isn't someone anyone of us are super excited about......but i think that stat in a vacuum is a positive sign.   Yeah he was replacement level over 180 innings last year.   That is an improvement over what Harvey gave us.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of doubt he has a 6-7 ERA but I don’t think you can completely rule it out.

By park factors, OPACY was the second most friendly hitters park and the new Rangers stadium was more of a pitchers park.  The AL East teams scored roughly 300 more runs than the AL West teams did.

And the Rangers were actually a pretty good defense last year, at least by FG measures. (Os werent too bad either although there was a big difference in OAA)

So it’s certainly possible that his numbers are worse here. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this move is certainly underwhelming, but I do think there’s a good chance Lyles is better than Harvey or Lopez was last year.   Not a sure thing though.  $7 mm for this guy is clearly an overpay but that’s what it takes to get pitchers to come here right now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Well, this move is certainly underwhelming, but I do think there’s a good chance Lyles is better than Harvey or Lopez was last year.   Not a sure thing though.  $7 mm for this guy is clearly an overpay but that’s what it takes to get pitchers to come here right now.  

Almost guaranteed he's going to be better than King Felix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aglets said:

That is an improvement over what Harvey gave us.

I am not sure I would bet on Jordan Lyles' 2022 exceeding Matt Harvey's 2021.

Lyles' 2022 FIP was about 3/4 of a run higher than Harvey's, and his HR/9 was almost a full 50% higher, and that was despite pitching in a much more forgiving division than Harvey.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

I am not sure I would bet on Jordan Lyles' 2022 exceeding Matt Harvey's 2021.

Lyles' 2022 FIP was about 3/4 of a run higher than Harvey's, and his HR/9 was almost a full 50% higher, and that was despite pitching in a much more forgiving division than Harvey.

 

But only 127.2 IP. 

I'm sure if you only pick Lyles' best 127.2 innings his numbers would be superior to Harvey's.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

I am not sure I would bet on Jordan Lyles' 2022 exceeding Matt Harvey's 2021.

Lyles' 2022 FIP was about 3/4 of a run higher than Harvey's, and his HR/9 was almost a full 50% higher, and that was despite pitching in a much more forgiving division than Harvey.

 

Yea, I think this is fair to say.  
 

Of course, the big difference is the amount of innings in only 4 more appearances but still, the quality of the innings could be similar.

Harvey gave up 4 runs or less in 71% of his starts (Lyles was at 75%) but he only went 6 IP or more in 5 of his starts(3 starts in a row in July).  That is 18%.  Lyles did that 56% of the time.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

I am not sure I would bet on Jordan Lyles' 2022 exceeding Matt Harvey's 2021.

Lyles' 2022 FIP was about 3/4 of a run higher than Harvey's, and his HR/9 was almost a full 50% higher, and that was despite pitching in a much more forgiving division than Harvey.

 

I don’t really care about Harvey’s FIP.    For me, FIP is nothing more than a rough predictive tool.  In terms of whether Lyles will be better than Harvey was last year,  I care about Harvey’s actual results last year, not his FIP.   Harvey had a 6.27 ERA, and Lyles’ ERA and his FIP were significantly lower than that (both last year and in his career).

FWIW, I like BaseballSavant’s xERA much better than FIP, since it accounts for quality of contact in a way that FIP does not.   Both Lyles and Harvey had a 5.41 xERA last year.

Your point about the AL East being tougher is well taken.    Lyles has pitched surprisingly few games in AL East ballparks.   We’ll see how that goes.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Perhaps, I don't really know. Since my press credentials were not renewed after COVID, I don't really know the new announcers besides Brett Hollander, due his WBAL days. I knew Arnold a little bit from his Frederick time.  Either way, I don't get the impression that Melanie talks out of turn or doesn't know what she can or can't say. Perhaps she was talking to Hyde and he said something offhand like, "Maybe even Bautistsa will be ready by the playoffs." Who knows?  I've been in a lot of situations talking with players and coaches and I knew what I could or could not say and when it was appropriate to report something, even if it was from an "unnamed source." I'm fairly certain Melanie would not still have a job with the Orioles if she did not know this by now too. 
    • It's a little surprising she would go "off-script", so to speak, on MASN when Elias has denied any chance of Bautista pitching this year. But perhaps MASN folks have a little more freedom under Rubenstein. 
    • Well, they got some good starts from Bradish so we'll see if that helps them win the AL East. If they win it by a game or two you can say he had an impact on this season. Bradish could still be back by the end of 2025 if everything goes smoothly.
    • Not to turn this into a Melanie Newman thread again, but she's actually not too bad when she's doing the color part of the broadcast. She'll drop some meaningful statistical information occasionally and the other day she said something (can't remember exactly what it was) and I was like, "Hmm, not bad Melanie" in my head. The issue is she just too slow in describing the action and does not paint a good enough picture of where the balls are hit or the likely outcome.  An example would be something like this.  "He hits a skyball into the deep blue sky....(second of pause) the outfielder is going out for it but he won't get it. And Henderson is on second for a double. We don't know where, how far, or what the action was other than the ball was a skyball and the outfielder misses it. She'll then go back and explain in more detail what happened. I better call would be "Henderson lines a ball into deep right center, the center fielder is going over quickly but it's going to fall in, Henderson is rounding first, heading for second as the CF throws the ball in to the cut off as Henderson walks into second with a standup double." Now we have a much better picture of what happened in our minds.  Arnold gets too wordy at times too and sometimes gets behind but he's still better overall and has the best radio voice. Brett Hollander is the best at PBP in my opinion despite my "dislike" for him calling the Orioles "Baltimore" like an away/national announcer.      
    • I feel as though they bungled Bautista and Bradish’s injuries by delaying the inevitable. Because of those delays, it could be no Bautista until 2025 and no Bradish until 2026. 
    • I think it’s fair to ask if he’s getting much to hit. With all the walks, it certainly seems like teams are staying away from him, even more so than Mayo. Would be nice to get some real reports about what is going on down there.
    • I take it more as this is the talk behind the scenes and she just didn’t read the room well enough to know she wasn’t supposed to say anything.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...