Jump to content

Left field at OPACY going through a big change


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

On 3/30/2022 at 8:32 PM, rm5678 said:

From this picture it appears that the front rows of sections 74 & 76 will be lower than the top of the wall, making it impossible for fans sitting there to see anything.

Will they be charging more for tickets to seats where you'll be unable to see lots of the game? Otherwise, could be a good deal on a nice day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, interloper said:

I like the generous warning track in the corner. I don't see that corner really being an issue, danger-wise. Looks great to me!

This board has a surprisingly (to me) positive view of this change. I guess I'm just going to have to agree to disagree and gnash my teeth about it elsewhere. I still think it looks terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, deward said:

This board has a surprisingly (to me) positive view of this change. I guess I'm just going to have to agree to disagree and gnash my teeth about it elsewhere. I still think it looks terrible.

Cool.  Let us know what the teeth gnashing does for you in the end.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, deward said:

This board has a surprisingly (to me) positive view of this change. I guess I'm just going to have to agree to disagree and gnash my teeth about it elsewhere. I still think it looks terrible.

To me I could understand if people were skeptical from the renderings, but now that it's finished, I think it looks pretty dang clean. It's not as awkward looking as initially presented, IMO. Eager to see it on camera and how it plays. Means is gonna love it. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, I think the new layout looks fine and I think this is a smart decision by the organization. 

In the short run it's not likely to help the O's win more games--our pitchers' numbers will look superficially better while some of our hitters' numbers will look superficially worse. 

But in the long run, this is going to help the Orioles attract free agent pitchers.  Of course, it will also make it harder for the O's to attract free agent hitters.  But Elias' strategy is to grow the bats and buy the arms--he has invested virtually all of his high draft picks and international signing dollars into position players.  If our farm system is going to crank out good hitters, then we will have a good offense without having to sign free agents.  If we need to bring pitching in from outside the organization, it is essential that we have a pitcher's park (or at least not so much of a hitters park).

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Three Run Homer said:

For the record, I think the new layout looks fine and I think this is a smart decision by the organization. 

In the short run it's not likely to help the O's win more games--our pitchers' numbers will look superficially better while some of our hitters' numbers will look superficially worse. 

But in the long run, this is going to help the Orioles attract free agent pitchers.  Of course, it will also make it harder for the O's to attract free agent hitters.  But Elias' strategy is to grow the bats and buy the arms--he has invested virtually all of his high draft picks and international signing dollars into position players.  If our farm system is going to crank out good hitters, then we will have a good offense without having to sign free agents.  If we need to bring pitching in from outside the organization, it is essential that we have a pitcher's park (or at least not so much of a hitters park).

 

I retain serious doubts that it will make much difference in that regard. I suspect that free agent pitchers will go where the money is. If that's us, then that's us. If it's not, then I don't see anyone giving us a park discount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, deward said:

I retain serious doubts that it will make much difference in that regard. I suspect that free agent pitchers will go where the money is. If that's us, then that's us. If it's not, then I don't see anyone giving us a park discount.

That is true at the top end of the free-agent market, but for players looking to re-establish value on a one or two year "prove it" contract, not pitching in a bandbox is definitely a factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I think they took a little too far. Reminds me of the way Memorial looked before they put in the lower “temporary” seats. I also think that while it could assist slightly in attracting FA pitchers, it’s not enough to overcome the division we play in, our tendency to not be the highest offer, and our history with free agency medical records. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Rutschman is probably the poster child for our increasingly free-swinging ways.  There was a little blurb in Dan Szymborski's chat regarding his free swinging ways, and Dan felt like it was a conscious decision to swing at more marginal pitches.  I took a more careful look at the swing/take data and I think the data does support that, and I think Rutschman is overall a bit more valuable swinging away at marginal pitches.   You can see the change in his swing decisions on pitches in the shadow zone.  He's actually making solid contact with these pitches at a high enough rate that it's been worth it to lose some plate discipline.
    • So you can post things about me like "Please stop talking about you.  No one gives a f*** about anything to do with your life, your bowling ball, your wife or anything else you try to pat yourself on the back about.  Your life is meaningless to the rest of us.".   And you said how dumb I am.  When I hadn't mentioned ANY of that in the post that you were responding to. Nothing.    I was talking about ORIOLES.  But I can't reply to any of that?  I never get personal until I am got personal with. You went there. I will tell you what....sports guy.  Post your pic.  Any pic. I will post mine....and I have...it is right in my avi. Because I know exactly what you look like. My guess is that you never will.   And we all know why.
    • It's a snapshot on a random day. Dodgers won 100 games last season, which was the third most in the league.
    • Somehow I had a feeling you would discount the accomplishments of a female athlete. Of course at no point did I begin to suggest they could compete against males.  That has nothing to do with how they were raised with a singular purpose to dominate in a single sport.
    • The Mariners and Dbacks made a major league trade last year of two contending teams.   The Mariners sent there closer for Josh Rojas a middle infielder and Dominic Canzone an outfielder.  Both the guys the Mariners aquired played a lot down the stretch.      I think with the exter wild cards and more teams in contention with playoffs there will be more of these type trades.  Maybe not someone as good as Seward was for the Mariners but solid relief guys for a position of need.  
    • The Williams sisters got destroyed by the 700th ranked men's tennis players in the world.  DESTROYED.  They have no chance.    Please do not compare men's and women's sports.  I played tennis my entire life, including at a Big 10 school, and the difference between men and women in sports is not EVEN in the same universe.  I would have to downsize my game 50% just so I could hit with them on a somewhat even basis.    But of course you like to make statements that are twilight zone stuff. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...