Jump to content

Forbes: O’s had $83 mm in operating income in 2021, but team value is down 4%


Frobby

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

My guess is because most of those expenses are not expenses.  As I said in the other thread, I think that fans wouldn't recognize most of that as operating expenses.   Things like depreciation of tangible assets as well as players.   Other things that they probably have some discretion as to how they're categorized and taken credit for.  With the information we have access to we have no idea how that $102M is broken down and what it's comprised of.  It's possible infrastructure and analytics investment went up $20M and other things offset that.

I agree with the last point.  We know they cut down on traditional scouts, for example.   There could be many things like that.   

FWIW, the Forbes operating income numbers are before depreciation, amortization, interest and taxes.   So, non-payroll expenses exclude all that.   I’m not saying there aren’t all kinds of other bizarre “expenses,” but apparently not those ones, in the Forbes numbers.   And, who knows where they get their numbers anyway.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

True, but they are probably pulling enough cash out of the team to make up for it.

That says something about the owners' position of being in hard financial straits.  You can explicitly not try to win for 4-5 years, have your attendance drop to the lowest levels in many decades, and the franchise valuation still more-or-less holds steady.  There's almost nothing an owner could do short of being Jeffrey Loria that would cause his team's value to fall appreciably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That says something about the owners' position of being in hard financial straits.  You can explicitly not try to win for 4-5 years, have your attendance drop to the lowest levels in many decades, and the franchise valuation still more-or-less holds steady.  There's almost nothing an owner could do short of being Jeffrey Loria that would cause his team's value to fall appreciably.

Loria bought the Marlins for 158M and sold them for 1.2B.

McCourt was an even worse owner and he also made out like a bandit.  430M --->2.15B.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Loria bought the Marlins for 158M and sold them for 1.2B.

McCourt was an even worse owner and he also made out like a bandit.  430M --->2.15B.

 

Those both prove my point, that you can be almost purposefully malevolent and make a killing on a baseball team.  If you did this with an EPL team you'd get relegated and half your revenues would disappear overnight and along with it a good chunk of franchise value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

Those both prove my point, that you can be almost purposefully malevolent and make a killing on a baseball team.  If you did this with an EPL team you'd get relegated and half your revenues would disappear overnight and along with it a good chunk of franchise value.

I wasn't trying to disprove your point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

He bought into the Expos for 50M and sold them for 120M.

So he even made out there.

It's evidently really hard to manage a team so poorly the value goes down.

Way to go Orioles!

Angelos bought the Orioles for $173M.  After nearly three decades of incompetent management he'd get well over $1B for them today.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

   Here’s what it shows for the O’s:

Revenue $251 mm

Gate receipts $20 mm

Player expenses $66 mm (includes benefits)

Operating income $83 mm

Non-major league payroll expenses $102 mm*

Team value: $1.375 bb (down 4%)

Sorry, but this tells me little. It tells me the Orioles had Revenue of $251 million of which I assume $20 million came from Gate receipts. I assume Forbes just noted gate reciepts separate to indicate attendance level or lack there of. I assume, it tells me the 40 man roster cost $66 million and operational costs (ie Warehouse plus I guess) was $83 million. Then  are we to assume the balance covers all else including minor leagues, draft pools, international bonuses, debt, profit, etc? I have no idea!!!!!

From this how can anyone gauge the status of this enterprise? 

What I do get, is some teams in MLB have Player (40 man roster) expenses over $200 million. 

I'm not saying the Oriole owners arn't pocketing money but I'd need a heck of a lot more than this to come down on either side of the ledger.

The best thing I got from Forbes is their guess at valueation of the Orioles. $1.375 billion - up from $173 million nearly 30 years ago. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I was talking about the sons' stewardship.

Per Forbes, in the spring of 2019 the team was worth $1.28 bb compared to the current $1.375 bb, up $95 mm or 7.4%.   So, that’s the sons’ stewardship, though frankly, we don’t really know when their stewardship began, just that it became more public at the time of the Elias hiring.   

The value of the Yankees has increased from $4.6 bb to $6.0 bb in that timeframe.   
 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

   

The best thing I got from Forbes is their guess at valueation of the Orioles. $1.375 billion - up from $173 million nearly 30 years ago. 

And, $173 million invested in 1993 compounded annually at 6 percent is roughly the $1.375 billion noted above.  You draw your own conclusions. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Frobby said:

One thing I find interesting is that non-payroll expenses are up only $5.5 mm from 2018.   That’s despite all the investment in technology, whatever has been spent so far on the Dominican conplex, increase in personnel devoted to analytics, etc.   So, when we hear that reductions in major league payroll are being used to fund infrastructure etc., well maybe, but the  vast majority of the savings is going to the bottom line.   That isn’t a surprise, but it does surprise me that the non-payroll expenditures have not really increased that much, especially when you consider that our spending on foreign amateurs has increased significantly since 2018.

No reason is given why the team valuation is down, but I suspect it’s due to declining attendance and brand deterioration derived from all the losing.

Team page here: https://www.forbes.com/teams/baltimore-orioles/?sh=2a0534db76db

MLB overview page here:  https://www.forbes.com/mlb-valuations/list/

 

 

 

 

Since the comparison goes back to 2018 possibly non-payroll expenses haven’t risen that much due to the elimination of one affiliate during that time plus a whole minor league season wiped out due to COVID.  I note that payroll category specifically states major league payroll. 
A smaller factor may be the contracts for Buck Showalter and Dan Duquette ran through 2018 and I imagine Brandon Hyde and Mike Elias are less expensive.

Of course no Joe Angel, Jim Hunter and Gary Thorne is most of it! 😜

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, JimGinSP said:

Since the comparison goes back to 2018 possibly non-payroll expenses haven’t risen that much due to the elimination of one affiliate during that time plus a whole minor league season wiped out due to COVID.  I note that payroll category specifically states major league payroll. 
A smaller factor may be the contracts for Buck Showalter and Dan Duquette ran through 2018 and I imagine Brandon Hyde and Mike Elias are less expensive.

Of course no Joe Angel, Jim Hunter and Gary Thorne is most of it! 😜

How much do minor league teams contribute to these expenses?  I think that has to be quite small.  I think we've seen numbers thrown around by the owners like 4-5% of revenue goes to non-MLB salaries, signing bonuses, pensions, health insurance and the like.  The Orioles' 2021 draft bonus pool was $11M or so.  I'd guess total minor league salaries aren't that much.  A single A player can make as little as $500 a week, and that's up significantly from 2020.  That's five months (no pay for offseason or spring training), so about $11k a year.  So Aberdeen's 26-man roster would be paid a minimum of $280k a year.  Even if many of the players are paid above minimum (and I don't really know) that's under $500k in payroll a year.  The AA minimum is $600 a week, AAA $700. 

Even if you assume average pay of 50% higher than minimums, the Orioles' total player salaries for their four full-season affiliates would work out to $1.8M a year.  Or about 2% of what we're calling operating expenses.  They're getting 100 minor leaguers for about the cost of Pedro Severino.

There may be some nuance I'm missing, but in general terms cutting Frederick was like eliminating one league-minimum MLB player.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I do remember seeing that Basallo went #1 overall in the winter league draft last year. So that will probably be where he ends up. Heck, that’s probably better competition. 
    • I don't think it's as lop-sided as you seem to.   Pre-roid it's close to a bump.  30/30 to 40/40 range in those years for Bonds.   Sure Ohtani could be using similar types of supplements result wise but the focused workouts would look different for Ohtani if he's not pitching. 
    • If you can get him on a 3-4 year deal at $20m or less, it's interesting. But here's the rub w/ Santander: yeah, he's a SH. That's great. And he generally has even splits. But he's not great defensively. He reminds me of a SH Nelson Cruz but without the batting average or OBP. I'm not so sure that ages well. I'd extend the QO and pursue a number of other of other options.  To me, it's better to get the draft pick and, say, sign a guy like Tyler O'Neill, Joc Pederson, or Jurickson Profar as your DH/OF type and maybe give RF to Kjerstad.
    • I'm bringing back: Offense/Defense C - Adley SS - Gunnar 3B - Westburg 2B - Holliday 1B - Mountcastle DH - Kjerstad LF - Cowser CF - Cowser/Mullins RF - ? Backup OF - ? Backup C - ? Utility - Urias Starting Pitchers SP1: Eflin SP2: Grayson SP3: Acquire somebody SP4: Kremer SP5: Suarez Relievers Closer: Felix Setup: Cano Late Relief: Webb Late Relief: Coulombe Late Relief: Perez Middle/Long Relief: Akin Reliever: ? Reliever: ? Depth SP: Povich, McDermott, Rogers RP: McDermott I'm bringing back, but not giving a spot to: Mayo Rogers Guys I'm giving a QO offer to: Burnes Santander - I really go back and forth with Santander. He's not great in the outfield. His average and OBP is a liability. But his power is prolific. Does that age well? I don't think so. I'd extend the QO and move on. I'm not bringing back: Mateo - had surgery at the end of August, could he be back in the middle of the season next year? Sure, but he's a FA after next season, and paying over $3m for a guy that might not play nor be effective isn't an adequate use of money Dominguez - I could be convinced to keep him if we're desperate Soto - was a poor acquisition not just because of the talent given up, but because he was always a situational guy with control issues O'Hearn - $8m for a guy that really shouldn't be in the field and can only hit righties is a lot of loot Santander - Give a QO, move on Eloy - Duh This means we need to acquire the following: Starting Pitcher(s) The O's can't go into next season giving Povich a spot and they definitely can not give a spot to Rogers. Rogers needs to be a deep depth arm until he showcases an increase in velocity and/or incredible promise that he can be serviceable and not a WHIP disaster who can barely go 5. Targets: Snell, Burnes, Fried, Wacha, Severino, Morton, etc.  Reliever(s) No more Phillies castoffs. No more waiver wire, dumpster diving for the entire bullpen. No more washed up vets.  Targets: David Robertson, Tommy Kahnle, Blake Treinen, Andrew Kittredge, Tanner Scott, etc. Position Player(s) Backup C (give more time to the backup if a better hitter so Adley can be fresh throughout year) Targets: Elias Diaz, Travis d'Arnaud (although I reckon the Braves pickup his option), Jacob Stallings. I guess if they're desperate they can stick with Blake Hunt (in the minors) Corner OF We could always acquire a bat first OF and then put Kjerstad in the OF. Targets: Tyler O'Neill, Jurickson Profar, Joc Pederson, etc. Backup OF Could be Mullins if they, say, call up Beavers and sign another OF, otherwise these are a dime a dozen out there. Just get somebody that can platoon since it's a heavy LHH OF right now. I'd entertain the O's calling up Beavers. 
    • I don't think Davis continued to put in the same level of effort on his fitness after he signed the huge deal.  
    • I think he easily surpasses 3/$55 million in this year's market, so it's kind of a moot point. "QO, take it or leave it" is still my final answer.
    • I would bet there are people in their mid to late 40's that don't remember the O's World Series win.  My dad wasn't a big sports guy and back then family's had one TV.  I don't remember much about sports before the O's coming up just short in 1982.  Definitely don't remember 1979 World Series even though I was 9.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...