Jump to content

The LF wall tracker


OsEatAlEast

Recommended Posts

I think there were three concerns here:

1.  Aesthetics: personally, I like the way it looks.   It’s quirky but not gimmicky IMO. It gives the park a lot of character so far as I’m concerned.

2. Safety/injuries: having looked at it, I don’t think this is going to be an issue.

3.  Effect on offense/homers: here, I do think the change may be a little too extreme.   But, ask me again when we see how it plays in the summer.   So far only 2 balls have really been affected.  Let’s see how many times it matters over a season and what the overall impact is.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aesthetics will be subjective for each observer, of course. I still don't like anything about how it looks. I would argue that moving the fans further away from the field (by virtue of a 13 foot wall) makes the park feel less intimate, thus removing character, not adding to it. Like I said though, a highly subjective topic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team has been plagued by terrible pitching for years. At he end of the day if this attracts better pitching and helps our current pitching I’m all for it. 

I’m indifferent on the way it looks but get that it takes away from the intimacy of the park. You could be in the outfield seats but still be close to the action. It does take away some good seating no doubt about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, byrdz said:

This team has been plagued by terrible pitching for years. At he end of the day if this attracts better pitching and helps our current pitching I’m all for it. 

I’m indifferent on the way it looks but get that it takes away from the intimacy of the park. You could be in the outfield seats but still be close to the action. It does take away some good seating no doubt about it. 

I'll continue to stand by my position that the team will attract better pitching when they actually start making top of the market offers for good pitchers. The park never mattered in that regard, and will continue not to matter. No one turned down more money to avoid the park and no one will give a discount because of the park. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, byrdz said:

This team has been plagued by terrible pitching for years. At he end of the day if this attracts better pitching and helps our current pitching I’m all for it. 

I’m indifferent on the way it looks but get that it takes away from the intimacy of the park. You could be in the outfield seats but still be close to the action. It does take away some good seating no doubt about it. 

Also, sure, the change will probably make the stats for our pitchers look superficially better, but won't it also do the same thing for visiting pitchers? What advantage does it give the team? How does that help win more games? I don't see how it helps the current staff, other than making the numbers on the back of their cards look a little better. The W-L records aren't going to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/30/2022 at 9:53 AM, MarCakes21 said:

I'm starting to lean the other way.  I think it gives great character and makes it more neutral, but I was even worried when Mountcastle hit that.  You shouldn't. need a 423ft, 112mph exit velo to clear.  I personally think in between what they've got now and the old wall would have been better.

It was certainly moved way too far back and then adding the height of the wall takes away all the fun of outfielders jumping into the stands to try and get balls back. I hate it.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

Is anyone keeping track now? 

I think we are.  There really hasn't been a lot.  Mancini, Boegarts, and now Santandar all lost HRs.  There's been some questions about hits that fell in that wouldn't have under the old dimensions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

I think we are.  There really hasn't been a lot.  Mancini, Boegarts, and now Santandar all lost HRs.  There's been some questions about hits that fell in that wouldn't have under the old dimensions.

Yeah, but I thought someone was tracking how many it cost us and the other teams to see if they even out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • The same thing is happening in all sports.  What does travel ball and AAU have in common?  They just play games & they don't practice, they don't learn the proper mechanics, they don't learn fundamentals, and rarely practice at all it is just a group of kids that play games and tournaments.  That is whey the United States is falling behind in players being drafted in the NBA from the United States.   Both AAU you dont do those little things then you go to some tournament and play countless games in a short period and then a few weeks later you do the same thing.  Even in high school and college sports they are playing more and more games.  If you have to play more games that means you are practicing less and less.  
    • I'd rather increase the number of pitchers to spread innings around more and account for modern pitch counts. 
    • I hear ya, but hear me… I know that mlb pipeline just did no major overhaul and has just slotted guys up based on graduations. I don’t follow the other lists daily so I would not be speaking accurately.  It’s July 2nd. The draft is two weeks away. Usually all the sources do a pretty big rerank once players sign and debut. So let’s wait 4-5 weeks until those overhauled lists come out. Our 3 guys shouldn’t have their eligibility exhausted unless an injury happens.  So we’ll see.  Heck, would might be not be eligible when the post draft lists come out in August. 130 ABs is the cutoff. 
    • Probably some combination of all the things that were leading to increased TJ before the pitch clock being taken even further and year to year variability.
    • Holliday for Logan Webb would be cool. There's not really a reason for them specifcially to do that trade, but that's the kinda player (established #1 starter under contract for 3+ years) that I'd do it for.
    • If the concern is that Scherzer might break down before the end of the season, then I'm not sure I see the logic in thinking the longer he pitches, the safer the deal becomes. I would think the more wear and tear on his body, the more likely that issues surface. 
    • And how did Joey work out? He was bouncing around 100 for a bit. I don’t think it’s quite respected enough yet and hopefully is by other teams now, the job that Elias and Sig have done to identify talent. They are hitting on all of their guys. All of them. So the return better have teeth because these guys will be playing on their team for awhile.    I could frankly care less what talent evaluators say and I could frankly care less about trading for Crochet. That dude is not an ace, hasn’t pitched major innings, could just end up in the bullpen and the pressure from national media is trade, trade, trade. When that happens, be wary.   No, I’d rather us keep our long term pieces in tact, go out and grab some DFA’d guys at the deadline and wait till the offseason for Rubenstein to unleash hell and re-sign Burnes, sign a couple of other relievers and grab a quality starter.   Keep the train moving. If anything, you’ll likely see Hays or Urias traded for some relief pitching depth and their presence on the team replaced with younger guys. At most you’ll see Norby traded as he doesn’t really have a spot once Holliday comes up. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...