Jump to content

Mullins since August 1 2021


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

It really depends on the return. No way do I want some more Dominican Lottery tickets kinds of trades. Honestly, if you look at the trades Elias has made, he hasn't exactly found a true nugget yet so I'm not excited about him trading off vets for prospects. 

Now maybe he will better at prospects for prospects kinds of trades, but Bradish looks like the best guy he acquired and I'm still not convinced he's going to be starter at the big league level long term. 

Either way, I'm fine with trading Mancini, Santander or even Mullins if the return was right, but it needs to be for high level (AA/AAA) prospects and not lottery tickets.

Well he also hasn’t traded anyone of real value either.  Bundy was the best and that trade doesn’t look bad at all.

And yes I agree..you don’t deal Mullins for that type of return.  Has to be at least one high impact guy coming back.  I mentioned Max Meyer in the past.  That’s the type of player I need coming back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I think that when you start to tentatively climb back towards respectability you need to be more judicious in trading everyone with current value for players who might be good in 2-3 years.  Especially players like Mullins who would still be under team control and probably of some value in 2-3 years.

And I'd say the "-" in 2-3 is a pretty big deal for a team at our place on the competition curve. 

That 2025 season where we have Mullins and Hays on Arb 3, but don't have Santander, is a likely peak year for our group. To me that's more reason to be patient with trading Mullins.

I also don't see a weaker two months and assume this is who he is now. This is a guy who went from AAAA guy to All-Star starter so even if this slump is more than random chance, I have some optimism about him finding a way out of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

And I'd say the "-" in 2-3 is a pretty big deal for a team at our place on the competition curve. 

That 2025 season where we have Mullins and Hays on Arb 3, but don't have Santander, is a likely peak year for our group. To me that's more reason to be patient with trading Mullins.

I also don't see a weaker two months and assume this is who he is now. This is a guy who went from AAAA guy to All-Star starter so even if this slump is more than random chance, I have some optimism about him finding a way out of it. 

Well it’s actually a weak 4 months although the slugging was good the last few months of 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well it’s actually a weak 4 months although the slugging was good the last few months of 2021.

Would you trade a top flight Pitcher like Mayer for Mullins?  I don’t think I would.  Especially after the numbers you’ve outlined over the last 4 months.  I think the Mullins trade for top flights prospect boat shipped out last offseason.  He will need to put up some incredible numbers soon to not fall into the one year wonder category.   I don’t see it happening.  He’s a nice player who had an outstanding year, his trade value has taken a massive hit. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Would you trade a top flight Pitcher like Mayer for Mullins?  I don’t think I would.  Especially after the numbers you’ve outlined over the last 4 months.  I think the Mullins trade for top flights prospect boat shipped out last offseason.  He will need to put up some incredible numbers soon to not fall into the one year wonder category.   I don’t see it happening.  He’s a nice player who had an outstanding year, his trade value has taken a massive hit. 

I don't think anyone was buying his 2021 season as the new normal, so I doubt his trade value has really changed since the offseason, the regression was built into the trade value.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Would you trade a top flight Pitcher like Mayer for Mullins?  I don’t think I would.  Especially after the numbers you’ve outlined over the last 4 months.  I think the Mullins trade for top flights prospect boat shipped out last offseason.  He will need to put up some incredible numbers soon to not fall into the one year wonder category.   I don’t see it happening.  He’s a nice player who had an outstanding year, his trade value has taken a massive hit. 

I wouldn’t but I could see teams doing it.  I think he’s a 2.5-3.5 WAR guy.  That’s a valuable player and it’s a position that’s tough to find. 
 

Like I said in the OP, he needs to heat up some.  If he does that, his trade value will remain high.  If he doesn’t, it may be worth holding onto him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

I don't think anyone was buying his 2021 season as the new normal, so I doubt his trade value has really changed since the offseason, the regression was built into the trade value.

That’s a fair assessment and likely true (re:value not taking a big hit).  I do think he needs to put up some significant numbers if he is going to bring anything back or real value.  If he continues along as a 2-3 WAR player, whose main attribute is speed, I don’t think it nets much of value.  He probably brings more value to Baltimore than he does in a trade.  I think Santander & Mancini will be the ones to go in the next couple months.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buyer beware.   Max had 4 walks and one strikeout his last start.   That always screams injury and that's just what he has.   Something to keep on eye on.   He might be back 100% or you might not see him until April of 2024.

 

he 23-year-old landed on the injured list last week with ulnar nerve irritation in his right elbow, but he'll return to throwing Thursday after being shut down for a week. Meyer will likely need some time to build his arm back up, but he could return to mound work soon since the shutdown was relatively brief.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Buyer beware.   Max had 4 walks and one strikeout his last start.   That always screams injury and that's just what he has.   Something to keep on eye on.   He might be back 100% or you might not see him until April of 2024.

 

he 23-year-old landed on the injured list last week with ulnar nerve irritation in his right elbow, but he'll return to throwing Thursday after being shut down for a week. Meyer will likely need some time to build his arm back up, but he could return to mound work soon since the shutdown was relatively brief.

 

Perfect, 2024 when the O's will finally be good.  I hate the idea of trading for starting pitchers when the O's still aren't competitive.  Pitchers seems to be either damaged goods or about to be damaged goods.  Would rather trade for good pitching prospects at least you get a good discount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Any decision made with the thought of this year is an extremely short sighted one and that is essentially what you are doing here.

This coming from the guy who has been beating the drum non-stop for a year about how they aren't doing enough to improve the team currently on the field?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SteveA said:

This coming from the guy who has been beating the drum non-stop for a year about how they aren't doing enough to improve the team currently on the field?

Yep..but they didn’t do what it takes to win this year so this point is moot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

The team went into the season not caring about wins.  So no, I don’t care about winning 65 or 67 games.  I would rather get the return to make the team better when they actually do care about winning.

In 2023, don't Mullins forecast ~2.5 wins have value of $20mm+ and cost of low?    How are the Orioles going to beat that, counting 2023 as a season they care about winning.    They might not have $20mm new cash to buy 2023 wins at all, apart from the other holes on the roster.

Its a consolidation period after a magic carpet ride that was never lasting forever, in which he is still pacing towards 4 wins.   Between Sell High and Buy Low, there is Just Win, which I feel is around where 2023-2024 Mullins is for this group.

The OAA 97 to 39 percentile collapse bears watching.   His speed percentile basically unchanged, so not quite sure what to make of that.    If Hays, Adley and Gunnar jam down the OBP gas pedal, his top of lineup spot might come into question as a delicate matter for Hyde.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Well it’s actually a weak 4 months although the slugging was good the last few months of 2021.

I just think it's a bit of a pessimistic assessment of his value going forward. 

I expect he'll settle in a little better than he's been the last 4 months. There's got to be adjustments made by other teams. Now he has to work through his own. This is still a guy going through a learning curve since it wasn't that long ago that he ditched switch hitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

In 2023, don't Mullins forecast ~2.5 wins have value of $20mm+ and cost of low?    How are the Orioles going to beat that, counting 2023 as a season they care about winning.    They might not have $20mm new cash to buy 2023 wins at all, apart from the other holes on the roster.

Its a consolidation period after a magic carpet ride that was never lasting forever, in which he is still pacing towards 4 wins.   Between Sell High and Buy Low, there is Just Win, which I feel is around where 2023-2024 Mullins is for this group.

The OAA 97 to 39 percentile collapse bears watching.   His speed percentile basically unchanged, so not quite sure what to make of that.    If Hays, Adley and Gunnar jam down the OBP gas pedal, his top of lineup spot might come into question as a delicate matter for Hyde.

It’s not 2023 that I have concerns about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I just think it's a bit of a pessimistic assessment of his value going forward. 

I expect he'll settle in a little better than he's been the last 4 months. There's got to be adjustments made by other teams. Now he has to work through his own. This is still a guy going through a learning curve since it wasn't that long ago that he ditched switch hitting.

What is pessimistic w/r/t the post you quoted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Right now I see the pitching staff as.  Eflin, GRod, Suarez, Kremer and one of Povich, Rogers, McDermott and Young.  All of the 5th starters have options so they can be on the shuttle if needed.   Bradish and Wells may come back in the 2nd half. Pen:  Bautista, Cano, Coulombe, Dominguez, Soto, Akin, Perez, Webb and Bowman.   Yes that is 9 but someone is normally injured.   I will not be surprised if the O's protect Nick Anderson and bring him to camp in case of injuries.    Akin has an option next year. That is 20 pitchers. Will Elias look to improve over the winner? Sure but with the 5th starters being able to either start or be a long man in the pen the O's begin the off season with volume on the pitching staff.
    • If you're going to make this a WAR/OPS/OPS+ debate, sure, he's not the best offensive player right now.  But then again his power/speed combination makes him tough to beat. Best talent ever because of the ability to pitch, yes.  That's the point I was making.  Not only to pitch, but to be dominant on the hill, too.
    • I think Mullins is as set as the entire lineup, but he would have to go if Elias chased the Robert upgrade. Getz already navigated the 3-team thing when he wanted Dodgers Latin kids, and the Dodgers didn't feel Erick Fedde was the caliber of pitcher they wanted to deploy. I do like Santander as a Victor Martinez aficionado, but he and Kjerstad are both RF profiles and, holy Rio Ruiz Batman, the handpicked kid has to play.    This is one of those calculations where the 80% as good for 20% of the cost part is easy, even if Kjerstad never achieves the heights Santander is at now. There's still room to hope Kjerstad is all Santander is and more, but even if he isn't, the team needs the Santander salary slot repurposed to pitching more than it needs him. I think after this summer's moves, we got a fair bit of information if Elias is trading Cowser/Kjerstad for pitching...looking like he isn't.
    • I think you can argue he’s the best talent ever because of his ability to pitch. As an offensive player, he’s not the best player right now.
    • Age, body type, how he plays(strengths/weaknesses) and what we have depth at, in terms of high end talent, coming up behind him. And yes, we should be out on most key FAs because they are largely terrible investments.
    • I'd say that overall his defense has also been down this year.  
    • Your point is entirely valid. Just because Tony is better than Trumbo was means nothing, because Trumbo was a catastrophe. It was just beyond comprehension that they kept putting him in the field. That said, Santander is still ok. Diminished range, but a good glove and arm. However, they avoided the problem with Nelson Cruz in Seattle and Minnesota by just putting him designated hitter, so that’s a possibility for Santander, if he can maintain solid contact. But not here. Let’s take the pick and use it on pitching, please.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...