Jump to content

Rosenthal: Os could be buyers and sellers


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Odor is the guy that assaulted someone on National Television right?

I'd rather the team not emulate that behavior even if a lot of folks here thought his action laudable.

You are correct it is not behavior to emulate, but I just watched it again and it made me smile.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Not getting Ks, not missing bats, expensive for longer and much older.  No idea why you would want him.

He’d instantly be our best starter, he has a 3.6 ERA so don’t pretend he sucks because you want Snell and his 6ERA. You wouldn’t take alll that money. As I mentioned you get them to eat half of what’s left  this year and next. To the Orioles you’d control him for 3 years at 6.5, 11.5, and 14. You could probably get them to absorb some part of 2024 it will just cost more in players. I doubt you have to give up more than a C prospect or 2. Snell is owed 13.1 and 16.6 so you’d be looking for Tampa to eat contract, will they do that? In comparison what is the player cost? Also you only have him through next season so you are extending him or have less control. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

He’d instantly be our best starter, he has a 3.6 ERA so don’t pretend he sucks because you want Snell and his 6ERA. You wouldn’t take alll that money. As I mentioned you get them to eat half of what’s left  this year and next. To the Orioles you’d control him for 3 years at 6.5, 11.5, and 14. You could probably get them to absorb some part of 2024 it will just cost more in players. I doubt you have to give up more than a C prospect or 2. Snell is owed 13.1 and 16.6 so you’d be looking for Tampa to eat contract, will they do that? In comparison what is the player cost? Also you only have him through next season so you are extending him or have less control. 

Snell is owed what is left of 13M, not 13M.

He also has a 4.66 ERA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

 Snell is owed 13.1 and 16.6 so you’d be looking for Tampa to eat contract, will they do that? 

Snell plays for the Padres.

And his is owed a pro-rated portion of $12.5M for 2022 (about $4.5M by the deadline) and $16M for 2023. The numbers you mention are his luxury tax numbers which spread his signing bonus over the length of his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not defending Bautista but I'm not about to defend Odor's actions just because it was directed at Bautista.

If I had a child I wouldn't want them acting that way.

 

I would.  My boys play baseball.  That slide was dangerous.  Joey got what he deserved.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

Snell plays for the Padres.

And his is owed a pro-rated portion of $12.5M for 2022 (about $4.5M by the deadline) and $16M for 2023. The numbers you mention are his luxury tax numbers which spread his signing bonus over the length of his contract.

Gotcha …. I firmly believe Bumgarner would be cheaper and his results are better, and won’t cost as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Gotcha …. I firmly believe Bumgarner would be cheaper and his results are better, and won’t cost as much.

I'm confused. Bumgarner is signed through 2024 and has a larger salary than Snell.

Both would basically be salary dumps, but Bumgarner makes more money.

I have no idea how much money the Diamondbacks and Padres would eat to trade them, but I don't think there would be any real prospect cost for either, as both make more money that they would earn on the open market.

Bumgarner's results have been better this year, but they weren't better in 2020 or 2021, and he is three years older so I don't know how anyone could say with any confidence that he would be better going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MurphDogg said:

I'm confused. Bumgarner is signed through 2024 and has a larger salary than Snell.

Both would basically be salary dumps, but Bumgarner makes more money.

I have no idea how much money the Diamondbacks and Padres would eat to trade them, but I don't think there would be any real prospect cost for either and both make more money that they would earn on the open market.

I don't think the Padres would eat any money.  The reason they are considering trading someone is to lower payroll.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think the Padres would eat any money.  The reason they are considering trading someone is to lower payroll.

I have no idea whether they would need to eat any salary to trade Snell, perhaps they wouldn't, but eating salary lowers the payroll whereas not trading someone because you won't eat salary doesn't lower the payroll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I hope we stick with five SP and deeper bullpen. The pen could use Suarez or Irvin.
    • At the end of the day, it's Boras' job to get his players as much money as possible. That has worked out in some cases, and not with others.  Hopefully the "winning" environment here will encourage players like Gunnar and Adley to sign extensions. I'd love to hear that the Orioles signed Henderson to a 10-year contract because he is a franchise guy. Adley is a catcher so that scares me more, but I'd be willing to extend him until he's 31 or 32. Gunnar though is the key and I think the Orioles know this. He's one of the best players in the league, he's fast, athletic, and barring a serious injury, there is no doubt he's going to be one of the best players in the league for a long, long time.
    • Baseball is a funny game sometimes, but you're right, we are going to battle with starters that were not even projected for the opening day rotation. Yet, here we are. Obviously anytime we have a series against the Yankees it's big, but even if we lose 2 of 3, we'd only be 2.5 games back.  The loss of Coulombe is huge and that bothers me more than the starters honestly. Perez, Akin, Baker and Tate filling key roles if Cano or Kimbrel is not available does not make me feel great. Baker threw the ball in his debut back and has been throwing well in AAA for a bit, so maybe he's a little bit of lightning in a bottle that this team needs in the pen.   
    • Count me in, but the Orioles have never really subscribed to that theory of splitting time like that. They really put an emphasis on everyday players and bench players with everyday players rarely getting days off.
    • I agree with this. I just feel like he hasn't been given a fair shot in two seasons up here. I can't see any reason that he can't start 4 games out of 7. Give Hays, Mullins, Santander and Cowser each one day off a week and let him start. 
    • This is probably obvious to many but I have not seen it talked about. With Bradish going on the IL and the recall of reliever Vespi they are now in a 5 man rotation.    Burnes, GRod, Irvin, Suarez and Povich.    And an 8 man pen. It was hoped that Kremer would join the rotation but his short 3 2/3 innings in Sunday's start at Norfolk probably means he gets another start in Norfolk on Friday.    If he does well at that point he could join the O's on June 26th.    Until then the O's are likely to continue with a 5 man rotation IMO.   Even if Kremer joins the rotation in June the O's probably go back to a 5 man rotation in July because of the number of off days in July.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...