Jump to content

Scott Garceau is not my cup of tea (Moderator edit)


NelsonCruuuuuz

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

He also knows Orioles history.  He says a few interesting things every once in a while, which is why he’s superior to Newman.

Garceau is the type of guy I would like to have a beer with and listen to him tell stories about older Oriole stuff.

Melanie knows plenty.  She’s not a good radio PBP person because she has trouble describing fast-moving events.  But she’s knowledgeable and hard working.  On TV I don’t mind her   

Choosing between her and Garceau is not a good set of options.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Melanie knows plenty.  She’s not a good radio PBP person because she has trouble describing fast-moving events.  But she’s knowledgeable and hard working.  On TV I don’t mind her   

Choosing between her and Garceau is not a good set of options.  
 

I haven’t heard anything from her that would make me call her knowledgeable but admittingly, I haven’t heard her much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

Why isn’t literally anyone else doing this series? Rob Long? Melanie? Tony? Frobby? Bigbird? Literally anyone else…

I think/thought the girl commentator is monotone and just plain boring. Problem with Garceau is he’s way past his prime. We really need our next (pick your poison). Thompson, Miller, Angel etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

He also knows Orioles history.  He says a few interesting things every once in a while, which is why he’s superior to Newman.

Garceau is the type of guy I would like to have a beer with and listen to him tell stories about older Oriole stuff.

He knows Oriole history so well that Friday night he referred to Padres /ex-Ray pitcher Blake Snell as Nate Snell.   Nate Snell spent a year or two in the Oriole bullpen 35 years ago.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Melanie knows plenty.  She’s not a good radio PBP person because she has trouble describing fast-moving events.  But she’s knowledgeable and hard working.  On TV I don’t mind her   

Choosing between her and Garceau is not a good set of options.  
 

Melanie might not have a voice that people love, nor is she as good at fast-moving calls as Kevin Brown, but she definitely does her homework.  I don't mind her at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

He also knows Orioles history.  He says a few interesting things every once in a while, which is why he’s superior to Newman.

Garceau is the type of guy I would like to have a beer with and listen to him tell stories about older Oriole stuff.

Scott is such a classy guy on top of it all. I'd like the Orioles to find their crew and stick with it next year. Kevin Brown should be the new Thorne. He's play by play for every game unless he has something else going on nationally. Then I think Geoff Arnold is the back up guy for PBP. 

Scott is perfect for the in studio stuff.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, SteveA said:

He knows Oriole history so well that Friday night he referred to Padres /ex-Ray pitcher Blake Snell as Nate Snell.   Nate Snell spent a year or two in the Oriole bullpen 35 years ago.

The old 32-year old rookie who the Orioles thought was 29-years old until he had to get a passport to go to Japan with the team. Snell was such an interesting story who had to overcome racism in the South in the late 60's, turning down two separate offers from major league teams, getting taken in the minor league portion of the Rule 5 draft, and being released all before finally making his debut in September of 1983.

If anyone wants more on Snell, check out out his great bio on Sabr at https://sabr.org/bioproj/person/nate-snell/ .

  • Upvote 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

The old 32-year old rookie who the Orioles thought was 29-years old until he had to get a passport to go to Japan with the team. Snell was such an interesting story who had to overcome racism in the South in the late 60's, turning down two separate offers from major league teams, getting taken in the minor league portion of the Rule 5 draft, and being released all before finally making his debut in September of 1983.

If anyone wants more on Snell, check out out his great bio on Sabr at https://sabr.org/bioproj/person/nate-snell/ .

What an interesting life. Thanks for sharing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While Kevin Brown is clearly the best current PBP option on the O's broadcast, I don't think Newman is awful.  Garceau on the other hand is.  20 years ago when Garceau was younger and his voice was better things might have been different.  But as one example (of many) his play call of Rutschman's game tying HR the other day had all the emotions of a funeral.  I think he'd be fine as a studio guy and I have no doubt he bleeds orange and black, but he's just in over his head as a PBP guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Melanie is fine as a studio host but her play by play is very amateur-ish. Especially her home run calls.

I was on the message board of one of the Orioles opponents who was watching the game on the Orioles feed. They were shocked that Melanie was an actual part of the play by play team and thought she was a fan who won some sort of "announce an inning of an O's game" contest. 😄

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think we're saying the same thing, or at least we rhyme. If they're going to include one league that has completely different quality of play, why not all leagues? Why stop at the Negro Leagues?
    • Baseball is different from most other team sports in a number of key aspects: The number of trials. 162 games is a lot of games to have random variation smooth out. If you pick random 16-game stretches you'll have NFL-like outliers, such as teams going 15-1 or 1-15. Nobody goes 150-12. Pitchers are very limited in how much they can pitch. A 200-inning starter can only have so much impact. Hitters cannot get more than ~1/8th of a team's PAs. This and the prior point means that there's no way around having your 3rd- and 5th and even 14th-best players getting almost as much playing time as #1. So you end up with the most dominant teams usually not even winning 2/3rds of their games, wherein other sports you can have teams win 80% or more. Which makes baseball look more random. Contributing to this is the expanded playoffs, where a .600 vs .575 matchup is more-or-less a coin flip. I doubt most other sports have a situation where the obviously best team in the league has a 25%-ish shot of the Championship (in other words, a 75% chance of going home disappointed) on day one of the playoffs. In most soccer leagues the regular season champ is The Champ, so there's a 0% chance of that. The best team always takes a big trophy home.
    • He got rewarded for swinging at a ball at his ankles.  He might also be able to hit a fastball up around his neck for a home run.  If he consistently swings at those types of pitches it will be to his detriment over the long run.  
    • People really underestimate luck and randomness. Drungo is right….baseball is no different than any other sport.
    • Yandy Diaz' BABIP for his career is .320. Last year it was .367. While batters exercise a larger degree of control over their BABIPs than pitchers, there is still a lot of noise (i.e. luck) in the data. This year his BABIP is down about 90 points compared to last. I would bet that's about equal parts not hitting the ball as well, and not having the balls he does hit fall in.
    • I think it can certainly be part of the recipe. 
    • Sure. But isn't that like saying a player pitched 85 innings of relief with a 3.00 ERA one year, then the next year he pitched 220 innings as a starter with a 3.00 ERA. I wouldn't say that was a consistent, expected performance.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...