Jump to content

2022 1st Round Pick Comp A (#33): Dylan Beavers - OF - (Jr) California University


Recommended Posts

The writeup doesn't make sense in this regard. They say he has all of the tools required to be a good hitter plus good pitch recognition but even with the proper swing adjustments he could be a below average hitter.  That makes no sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to say I really like this pick.  This kids is really tooled up.  Longenhagen noted in a recent podcast that his tools are similar to Elijah Green.  I think he is more talking about his power profile and bat to ball skills vs his speed, but he still makes a good point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One detail in Ciolek's Zoom last night was the Orioles thought Beavers is a guy who may stand to benefit from a pro strengthening program.      He's got the Judge-Stanton-Mayo frame where figuring out how to optimally maintain all those trunk muscles is maybe more of getting to your on-field effectiveness than for some other players.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

The writeup doesn't make sense in this regard. They say he has all of the tools required to be a good hitter plus good pitch recognition but even with the proper swing adjustments he could be a below average hitter.  That makes no sense to me.

May have just been a simple typo. Perhaps the writer meant to write "an above" instead of "a below". Because the plus power and other tools combined with a better swing would certainly seem like an above average regular outfielder to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Law:  https://theathletic.com/3430456/2022/07/18/mlb-draft-extra-credit-dodgers/?source=user_shared_article

33. Baltimore Orioles: Dylan Beavers, OF, California

No. 51 on the Big Board

Beavers is a strong power play for Baltimore with their second pick, a raw college hitter with the athleticism to be a plus defender in right field, but who has something of a hitch in his swing that might limit his ability to hit for average. He’s actually played centerfield and could go out there in pro ball, but given his size and frame, he’s more likely to end up in right. I thought the first round was a stretch for him with the hit tool questions – and he only hit .297 this spring, with a .427 on-base percentage and .634 slugging percentage – but for a second pick, he’s a great gamble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, oriolediehard said:

Why didn't we pick Porter instead of Beaver?  Porter was undrafted in the first round.  It really pi....s me off.

What do you know about Porter other than the fact he is highly ranked by most publications?  He lasted until the 109th pick so it's not like we are on an island here.  There either was something we did not like about him, we did not think we could sign him, we did not want to sign him at the price it would take or some combination of those three. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • None of them. Not a single one was good. And none were particularly good before they got here. IMO, it was not the right/proper approach to make a bunch of moves around the margins for this team (or even last year's team to be "honest"). We had real holes and needed real players that were actually good (i.e. like Tony's orginal example Erceg). Based on his last few seasons, it wasn't hard to predict that Kimbrel wouldn't be effective through the course of an entire season and into the post season. It wasn't hard to predict regression of Cano based on how his the last 3/4 months of his 23' went (adding that to that fact that he is a contact pitcher pitching in high levarage situations). It wasn't hard to predict that 22' was an outlier season for Perez and that largerly he is a mediocre reliever. And so on ... Obviously, there is no one single pitcher that can replace a Bautista (maybe Miller?). But Elias was very ineffective in building an effective bullpen for 2024. That's honest.
    • Wow! I guess it just seems that way. 
    • Gunnar and Mullins at 1-2 in some order and Westburg batting cleanup? AS at 3, OHearn at 5, Cowser 6 and Adley 7?
    • That team was              2024 7th RS                           2nd 9 BA                              3 5 K’s                             8 2 SLG                          1 101 OPS+                    118   Imagine that team playing in this park now? I know how bad they looked yesterday. Not denying that. 
    • We literally do not have any elite relievers. I trust Eflin more than anyone we have in the pen as long as he isn't struggling.
    • He is having a down second half so maybe 1/6th of his career. I do think this makes him harder to extend now. He will likely want to play better to get the best contract, but the closer he gets to free agency and if he bounces back, the number rises quickly.  For me the issue with Adley is on offense and a future in which he needs to DH or play first. Just not enough offensive capability at this point to justify that contract. I do love Adley and I also think he is hurt.
    • I feel like this lineup compares to 2016 in the sense that it's a home run or nothing. Otherwise, yes it's a different organization and we have a chance to be a playoff team for the better part of a decade. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...