Jump to content

Trade Deadline Primer/Thread


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, PHRESH said:

If we were one piece away I'd risk it, but I think all 4 of those guys are going to be vital to the next contending squad 

 

22 minutes ago, Bmorebirds24 said:

I think the best decision was staying out of it. No way the Orioles would have kept Soto with the money he wanted. So to build this system and sell 3-4 top 10 prospects would be beyond stupid especially when he doesn’t make this team a WS contender right now and it would cost  $450-500 mil to keep him. 

Oh yea agree 100%. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

What are the Dodgers giving up for Gallo a box of baseballs.

Is there any chance the Dodgers would have traded for Santander instead of Gallo?

Actually they gave up Clayton Beeter who was pretty hyped when drafted. Had excellent stuff but health was an issue. He still has excellent stuff, but the command is pretty bad. If he can't improve it vastly, he's a pen arm. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

Actually they gave up Clayton Beeter who was pretty hyped when drafted. Had excellent stuff but health was an issue. He still has excellent stuff, but the command is pretty bad. If he can't improve it vastly, he's a pen arm. 

Not a bad return for a hitter who put up a .660 OPS during the last year as a Yankee. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you guys probably don't care, but man I love the return the Cubs got for Robertson. Ben Brown, huge pop up prospect, sitting 95-98 and just a few days ago was labeled as untouchable by the Phillies. Fantastic numbers in A+ and had just been promoted to AA.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I know you guys probably don't care, but man I love the return the Cubs got for Robertson. Ben Brown, huge pop up prospect, sitting 95-98 and just a few days ago was labeled as untouchable by the Phillies. Fantastic numbers in A+ and had just been promoted to AA.

Dave Dombrowski trading away his prospects in an attempt to win now some things never change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Why does everybody want to jump and label a kid so fast? What is this, his 2nd major-league season? Yes, certainly they shouldn't go into next year thinking he's a lock for 30+ starts and 180-200 innings but we can't say he's already reached his peak either. 
    • And their defense is very good. To put things in perspective, the Tigers collective dWAR is +0.5. The Orioles is -2.8. Minnesota -4.1, Yankees -0.3, Houston -0.1, Seattle +2.0, Royals at +2.5. The Royals really standout as most of that value is driven by Fermin (catcher) and Witt.  But I think my point is that the Tigers have excellent pitching (starting pitching and bullpen) as well as excellent defense. And they're not putrid with the bats.  I would say the one saving grace about the Tigers is they don't run much. 
    • We could have easily swept Detroit in Baltimore, the lineup we have now is not the lineup they faced. It doesn't matter who the opponent is, just win.
    • Both of them are important to consider here. They could have a mediocre offense every single game of the season, but if the pitching is elite (and it is!), it'll carry them.  We have 6 games against the Tigers this year. And yes, most of them were without the cadre of regulars. But here are the offensive numbers against them: .211/.282/.392 - .674 OPS They scored 20 runs in 6 games against them. Barely scraping 3 R/G. And a good portion of them coming in *1* game.  Out of the WC potentials the O's could face, here are their R/G: Royals: 29 in 6 games = 4.8 R/G Twins: 22 in 3 = 7.3 R/G Mariners: 27 in 6 = 4.5 R/G Tigers: 20 in 6 = 3.3 R/G Out of all the playoff teams, the best RA/G are the Mariners (3.75), Guardians (3.85), and Tigers (4.96). For the playoffs, you want to look at who you're facing on the bump. Which team scares you the most? Because if you can't hit against the team, it doesn't matter what the opposing offense is.  Also you'll want to consider the best fielding teams, too.   Seems to me you'd want to face the team you matchup best against *and* who has the worst defense and worst pitching, because presumably your 3 starters (Burnes, Eflin, Kremer) should be able to hold teams in check. 
    • I'd prefer Detroit - they've been so hot for so long they should be due to cool off. KC has been just the opposite. 
    • I'd say the Royals...pitch around Witt and Salvy Perez who seems to have had our number in recent years.  The rest of their lineup isn't too imposing. Wacha  -a guy I wanted this offseason and was laughed at for wanting him- has a 2.64 ERA over his last 15 starts.  He's the soft-tossing type that gives our lineup fits and, IIRC, he was great against us earlier this year.  Lugo has had a great year, so has Ragans.  Their starters are good. But they're 3-7 over their last 10 while the Tigers are 8-2.  A lot of the postseason, IMO, is catching teams at the right/wrong time.  This could all change by next week but the Tigers are hot, the Royals are not... Then again, I said I wanted to face Texas in the first round last year and look what happened.  So who knows.  
    • Would much rather face KC and to me it’s not close.    game 1 agains Skubal is an L. They’ve proven they can beat us with a bullpen game, a bullpen only behind CLE as best in the AL.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...