Jump to content

Poll: What’s your view of the Mancini trade?


Frobby

What’s your view of the Mancini trade  

122 members have voted

  1. 1. What’s your view of the Mancini trade?

    • Don’t like it - I didn’t want to trade him
    • Don’t like it - the return wasn’t enough
    • OK with it -we needed to get what we could even if a little disappointed with the return
    • Like it - very solid return for Mancini
    • Love it - really surprised we got that much for Mancini

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 08/06/22 at 16:38

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, DJHJR86 said:

He's a 30 year old DH who has a negative dWAR and has only had two seasons where he was above starter level WAR with a career .1 WPA.  

Negative dWAR is irrelevant.  An average defensive 1B or a DH has negative dWAR.   That just comes with the assigned role.  It’s all about how you hit.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Negative dWAR is irrelevant.  An average defensive 1B or a DH has negative dWAR.   That just comes with the assigned role.  It’s all about how you hit.  

He still has only had 2 seasons with above starting level oWAR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DJHJR86 said:

He still has only had 2 seasons with above starting level oWAR

True, but he probably will this year.  Look, he’s a solid hitter and a good clubhouse guy.   Is he a star?   No, but nobody said he was.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

Obviously this topic is discussed elsewhere but I thought a poll would be a good way to crystallize posters’ reactions.   What say you?

Good poll. I don’t really know how to answer it because my feelings about the trade are colored by the fact that I had to try to explain it to my young son who was crying upon learning the news and saying “I just want to want to watch Trey Mancini play.” I’d probably say I didn’t want to trade him for that reason, but I also get it, accept it, and am not disappointed in what they did (in contrast with the Lopez trade).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Look, he’s a solid hitter and a good clubhouse guy.   Is he a star?   No, but nobody said he was.  

He was a great guy who handled adversity well, but his production is not going to be hard to replace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love the return.

Love that Mancini goes to a contender (for his sake)

Love that this opens up at bats for Vavra and Stowers

Love that the Orioles helped a team that has a shot to knock off the Yankees.

Love that Yankees fans were whining about Boston and Baltimore trying to sabotage their World Series hopes by sending good players to the Astros.

Edited by bluedog
  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
    • Dam the mosquito is in my Jelly. Please go away
    • Elias is refusing to spend money that Rubenstein has made available.  Do you have any sources?
    • Outside Hamilton, I can't really think of any areas or invidivuals outside the line that have really stepped up.  Humphrey and Stephens have played okay but it certainly hasn't offset the complete zeroes that Eddie Jackson and Marcus Williams have been.  I don't think you want to pull Hamilton off SS even though he can handle deep zone assignments fine, because he's essentially a linebacker that can cover wide receivers and there's too much value in that in the box.  And I think that Roquan/Simpson look lost in pass coverage because the safeties behind them are playing like butt.  Besides Roquan wasn't ever really a great coverage safety, he was kind of okay at it but he was never like a Lavonte David or Fred Warner there.   I'm starting to wonder if we need to either trade for a FS and/or start giving Ardarius Washington more snaps.  He certainly doesn't look worse than Jackson/Williams at this point in his limited playing time.  In general i think safety is an undervalued position so we're likely to get good value in trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...