Jump to content

MLB competition committee to vote on rule changes Friday


ShoelesJoe

Recommended Posts

I certainly don’t think it will hurt the game to see 25-50% more steals.  Steals are fun.   

One thing about these changes — they can always be changed back if they don’t work as intended or the results are too extreme.   I’m fine with a little experimentation, especially when these things have been tried in the minors already.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/10/2022 at 8:36 AM, Frobby said:

The shift rule bothers me more in principle than it does in practice.  Some guy hits the ball to the same area 75% of the time and you can’t adjust your defense to account for that?   Boo!  But I do think it will boost offense, which is good.  

I don’t mind the change, but I was hoping it would have happened organically instead of being mandated.  I realize it’s hard to ask the players to take pay cut by hitting ball the other way and no try to hit a HR every AB, but I just assumed batters would eventually make an adjustment to take advantage of what the defense was giving them.   I think the long term outcomes will be beneficial and batters w/o power will stop selling out for HRs trying to raise their pay and start to focus more on OBP skills.  I guess we will see.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I don’t mind the change, but I was hoping it would have happened organically instead of being mandated.  I realize it’s hard to ask the players to take pay cut by hitting ball the other way and no try to hit a HR every AB, but I just assumed batters would eventually make an adjustment to take advantage of what the defense was giving them.   I think the long term outcomes will be beneficial and batters w/o power will stop selling out for HRs trying to raise their pay and start to focus more on OBP skills.  I guess we will see.  

I think the long and short of it is, it’s hard for most hitters to hit to all fields.  It’s not just a matter of trying to hit homers.   It’s not that easy to handle pitches with different velocities and different breaks and control the direction the ball is hit.  I think a lot of hitters would try to beat the shift if they thought they were capable of doing it. 

In 2002, about 43% of batted balls were pulled, 29% to CF, 28% opposite field.  By 2012 (roughly the start of the advent of shifting), it was 40/35/25.  It’s still about 40/35/25 today.  So it’s not like hitters have gotten pull crazy in the last decade, or even the last 20 years.   

(Sorry, the data doesn’t go back much earlier than 2002.)

 

Edited by Frobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think the long and short of it is, it’s hard for most hitters to hit to all fields.  It’s not just a matter of trying to hit homers.   It’s not that easy to handle pitches with different velocities and different breaks and control the direction the ball is hit.  I think a lot of hitters would try to beat the shift if they thought they were capable of doing it. 

In 2002, about 43% of batted balls were pulled, 29% to CF, 28% opposite field.  By 2012 (roughly the start of the advent of shifting), it was 40/35/25.  It’s still about 40/35/25 today.  So it’s not like hitters have gotten pull crazy in the last decade, or even the last 20 years.   

(Sorry, the data doesn’t go back much earlier than 2002.)

 

I realize the batting break down is just about the same, and that’s kinda my point.  Starting back in 2012 with the start of the shift massive holes started opening up, holes that had never been there.  It’s easier to hit a ball the other way than it is to hit it over the fence.  You don’t need perfect contact and massive EVs.  I guess I always thought that there would be some natural progression and a team or player would try to take advantage of the new holes created and start a new trend.  But in an age of getting paid to hit the HR and launch angle, no one took that gamble with their careers.  It just seemed to me that making hitting into the hole a focus, a player could really impact his OBP.  I think I was just wrong.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jayson Stark had an interesting article on the rule changes. Worth a full read. Given the middle IF prospects we have near the big leagues, I thought this part was interesting:

https://theathletic.com/3604919/2022/09/19/mlb-rule-changes-pitch-clock-shift-ban/

 

This has a chance to dramatically change how teams are built.

In what ways, you ask? Here are two:

It’s a great time to be an athletic middle infielder. Let’s begin with another Epstein observation from the press conference: What fans want, he said, is having games decided “by diving plays” — not “by whose front office devised the best algorithm” to position all their shifting infielders.

So on that note, let’s talk about Mike Moustakas. Nothing personal. He just came up over and over as the poster boy for second basemen you’ll never see again in baseball.

“When you’re putting a roster together now, this is going to impact how you view defense. I’ll use Mike Moustakas as an example. He’s played a lot of second base, but he’s not a second baseman, He doesn’t have the foot speed to play second base. But in a shift, he could do it.” — one club exec

Well, not anymore. Teams are now going to rethink which positions they can sacrifice defense for offense. And in a world without shifts, second base won’t be one of those positions. I’d love to be an agent for an athletic free-agent middle infielder this winter. That’s going to go well.

“When you put together your team now, you may have three positions that are all about defense only – second base, shortstop and center field.”  — the same exec

It’s time to collect left-handed pull hitters. You know what has changed since these new rules were announced? How front offices watch games every night. They now amuse themselves by tracking all the outs that would be hits with no shift. And all of a sudden, they have a newfound appreciation for left-handed mashers.

An executive of one team told me about a left-handed hitting player in his system who might not still be on the 40-man roster — but was kept around because the new shift rule would change his value. Another exec brought up Matt Carpenter, a perfect example of a left-handed pull hitter whose career was almost ended by the shift and now will be looked at in a whole new light.

“I think there are guys who are going to add 15 to 20 points to their average because of this. Matt Carpenter is one. Anthony Rizzo is another. Those are guys whose average has just been brutalized by the shift. But now I can see guys like that having much greater value, because they do hit the ball the other way in the air. They just hit most of their groundballs to the right side. And the shift has turned them all into outs.”  — one longtime exec

So who knows — in future years, players like that could add even more value. And why would that be? Because …

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
40 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

 

I really dislike the ghost-runner rule, it just doesn't feel right. 

I don't care as much about the position-player pitching rule (they really should only be doing it in blowouts or extra innings) but it is interested that they're keeping the amount of pitchers on the active roster limited while also limiting flexibility of using someone off the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CharmCityHokie said:

I really dislike the ghost-runner rule, it just doesn't feel right. 

I don't care as much about the position-player pitching rule (they really should only be doing it in blowouts or extra innings) but it is interested that they're keeping the amount of pitchers on the active roster limited while also limiting flexibility of using someone off the bench. 

I read a Fangraphs piece the other day about forfeits and I've advocated for just forfeiting if you are in an obvious losing position.

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/stop-wasting-everyones-time-and-quit-already/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Mateo has an open stance at the plate and also stands back from the plate. Hence, he is very susceptible to the  slider or sweeper off the plate. I was expecting a strike out last night with runners on first and third. In fact, he had two swings and misses at outside breaking pitches during that at bat. But, the pitcher threw one that was in the wrong place and Mateo ripped it. He is doing a good job of staying on those pitches he can handle. And, as stated above, not quite as prone to wave at outside breaking stuff. He is fun to watch.
    • @now had it right - I saw it also on the O's Xtra pregame show - Rob Long did a 2-day "school" talking with Sig on the advanced stats.    I think this is it. I've joked before you can get a lead on Orioles targets just looking at whose ERA-FIP differential is bad. I believe the 30 GM's collectively are past that as they negotiate with each other, but I'm sure they are all trying to optimize each individual negotiation. Its fun to watch Sig navigate what do I want to say to the MASN viewer that none of the other 29 orgs can scrape for tidbits of anything the Orioles are drilling in on. "We like players who are good"
    • Miller is mikes better than any of our relievers. One bad outing doesn’t change that. Felix had bad outings before. It happens.
    • As I said, in my second post, he has improved, I don’t care what he did last year. I’m much more interested in what he’s doing this year. And he’s improved, but he still walking seven batters per nine, and as far as I’m concerned, No. He was maddening when he was here, and I expect that he would be if he returned
    • Is that true? I don't think that it is. I think baseball and other sports are similar in this respect. I picked a random NHL player... literally the first one I stumbled on, Luc Robitalle. He played 19 years in the NHL. Had a peak goal scoring season of 63, and also had seasons of 23, 15, 11, 30. Heung-min Son is a poplar Premier League soccer player, a forward, for Tottenham Hotspur. In his nine years with the club he's scored totals including 4, 14, 12, 11, 23, and 10 goals. Wayne Rooney was a regular starter in the Premier League from 2002-2018 and had goals scored totals anywhere from six to 27, including consecutive years in his prime of 27, 11, 11, 26. In the space of eight years Wilt Chamberlain had season average scoring marks of anywhere from 24 to 50 points per game. In 1981 John Riggins played in 15 NFL games, rushed 194 times for 714 yards and 13 TDs. In 1983 he played in 15 games and rushed 375 times for 1347 yards and 24 touchdowns.
    • It's all good... and good reply. 
    • Mejdal was interviewed during the TV broadcast... maybe two weeks ago. He repeated his preference right at the end of the interview (IIRC, from the stands or field). 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...