Jump to content

Struck out. All weekend.


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

The thing about Judge is he’s doing this in an era where offense is down a bit.  Regardless of how you feel about Bonds, the year he hit 73 there were other guys hitting 64, 57, 52 etc.   Judge has 19 more homers than the next guy on the leaderboard.  I can’t remember a year in my lifetime where the margin was that high.   You might have to go back to Babe Ruth to find a margin like that.  

Judge has 61 in 672 PA.  (1/11)

Trout has 38 in 472. (1/12.4)

This isn't to take away anything from what Judge has done but his pace isn't that much greater than one of his peers.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barry Bonds had 177 walks with 35 IBB

Aaron Judge has 106 walks with 18 IBB

He is obviously getting pitched to more than Bonds did the year he broke the record, so I am not opposed to being really careful pitching to him, but wouldn’t go as far as throwing nothing but balls or intentionally walk every at bat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Judge has 61 in 672 PA.  (1/11)

Trout has 38 in 472. (1/12.4)

This isn't to take away anything from what Judge has done but his pace isn't that much greater than one of his peers.

Fair enough point.   But don’t we need to omit Trout from any comparison involving mere mortals?   Seriously, the guy is ridiculous year in and year out.  It’s just a matter of how many games he misses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

Is it really a big problem?    Walking guys is only rarely a good strategy.  

I'm not talking about walking guys as a strategy, but not throwing balls over the plate as a strategy. Pitchers try to do everything they can to not put any kind of remotely hittable pitch over the plate. The purpose of walks and ball and strikes was specifically so that they'd put balls over plate so hitters could put the ball in play.

Hitters know what pitchers are doing, so (most of them) wait until a ball is grooved, knowing if one isn't they can fall back on a walk.  Pitchers pitch around batters knowing the fallback is just a walk.  Both sides are pretty okay with nobody putting the ball in play.

Then one day you look up and you have a four-hour nine inning game where like 10 balls have been put in play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Judge has 61 in 672 PA.  (1/11)

Trout has 38 in 472. (1/12.4)

This isn't to take away anything from what Judge has done but his pace isn't that much greater than one of his peers.

One thing I haven't really thought through or looked into is why homers seem more spread out among players now.  How is it that MLB had 2019 where the most homers per PA of all time happened, but one guy in the NL and nobody in the AL hit 50 homers? 

You can speculate about steroids, but throughout history people have hit 50+ homers in seasons where there weren't half as many homers as today.  Jimmie Foxx, Hank Greenberg, Ruth, Foster, Mays, Hack Wilson, Mantle, Maris... but in the years where we saw the most homers ever by quite a ways Stanton, Judge, and Alonso were the only ones to clear 50 and Stanton is the only one to approach 60.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

One thing I haven't really thought through or looked into is why homers seem more spread out among players now.  How is it that MLB had 2019 where the most homers per PA of all time happened, but one guy in the NL and nobody in the AL hit 50 homers? 

You can speculate about steroids, but throughout history people have hit 50+ homers in seasons where there weren't half as many homers as today.  Jimmie Foxx, Hank Greenberg, Ruth, Foster, Mays, Hack Wilson, Mantle, Maris... but in the years where we saw the most homers ever by quite a ways Stanton, Judge, and Alonso were the only ones to clear 50 and Stanton is the only one to approach 60.

It has always been the ball. Steroids had nothing to do with hitting. 
 

Change the ball and hits die, change the ball and they fly out the stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
    • Paging @Tony-OH to the thread.  🤣 I've actually advocated for this in the minors forums...letting other teams draft and try to develop guys to see which have a shot of sticking and which don't.  Essentially let other teams make mistakes in the draft and trade for guys that are still in the lower levels in other systems but you think have a shot.  I do believe that's part of Elias's strategy....as risk adverse as he is, he's not going to take risks on drafting pitching if he views that's the biggest risk in the draft. All I'm saying it'd be nice to have a Skubal come through our system.  Does anyone really disagree with drafting and developing a Cy Young winner or is that something you guys aren't interested in?
    • Oh, I get that. I just think you'd be hard pressed to say year in and year out the Central is anything but a mediocre division.  Typically, the AL East has at least 3 strong teams, with some seasons where 4-5 of them have winning records or close to it.  But it doesn't matter. As said before, I've been saying for weeks prior to the end of the season that the Tigers were a very good team. I just wouldn't trade our org, team, farm, whatever for the Tigers. 
    • Does it matter if they get drafted and developed vs. traded for and developed? Hell, the O's starting rotation was a strength this year. Here's a breakdown of how it was constructed: Burnes - traded for (Elias) Suarez - free agent (Elias) Kremer - traded for (Duquette) Eflin - traded for (Elias) Grayson - drafted (Duquette) Bradish - traded for (Elias) Povich - traded for (Elias) Irvin - traded for (Elias) Tyler Wells - Rule V (Elias) Rogers - traded for (Elias) McDermott - traded for (Elias) Means - drafted (Duquette) I'm excluding Bowman being an opener and getting a starting credit.  But that said, out of all of the starters that the O's used this year, none were drafted by Elias, and only 2 were drafted by the O's (GRod, Means). 8 were acquired via trade (7 by Elias, 1 by Duquette), and 2 via FA or Rule V.  I don't necessarily think that Elias needs to draft starters to build a rotation, but it would be nice to see a couple make it before being traded, TBH.  That said, I don't think the above is sustainable, but the strategy would be sustainable if you have free agency play a bigger part. Look at the Royals. Their best 3 starters weren't drafted by them (Ragans - traded for, Wacha - FA, Lugo - FA). 
    • Unfortunately, it's looking like there is a lot of truth in that statement.  I believe Steve Bisciotti (Ravens owner) once said, he wanted to have a good team every year, get into the playoffs enough, eventually things go your way and win the Super Bowl.  This was in response to playing salary cap games for a few seasons and then eventually having to pay the piper with the dead money and being uncompetitive for a few years. Hopefully the O's can be consistently good and get hot at the end of the season and make a run through the playoffs.  Go back to June 1st and the five best teams in the league were the Orioles, Yankees, Guardians, Phillies and Dodgers.  Two are already out, Guardians fading fast with the Yankees and Dodgers still alive.   A Tigers - Mets World Series would be quite fitting.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...