Jump to content

.258


jdwilde1

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, JR Oriole said:

Bill Ripken hit .291 in 1990.  Bradley was .270 and I think Orsulak was .269.

The fact that none of our hitters had a remotely good batting average is kind of incredible. 

 

Back when I was a kid WTTR in Westminster used to do a trivia question during the 7th inning stretch (maybe it was through WBAL as well, not sure).  They were usually pretty easy so by the time I'd call in someone would already have won.  Sometime in 1990 the question was asked, which Oriole with enough ABs to qualify had the highest batting average the previous year.  I had my Topps team set so I furiously looked it up and found that it was Phil Bradley and won the contest.

Don't remember what it was, I want to say a $10 gift certificate to the mall or something like that, but 9-year old me felt like a king that night.  I stayed up late so I could hear my name announced to the radio as the winner.

Edited by glenn__davis
  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, owknows said:

Batting average is just another stat. It has predictive value. It is well correlated with OBP.

I have a hard time understanding the general herd-mind snobbery that comes out whenever anyone mentions Batting Average.

RIght, it's just another stat!

So why do folks complain so much about it?

Why is there a thread bemoaning the low batting averages on the team?

In 2019 we had Hanser Alberto hit 305, he didn't walk or hit for power so his OPS+ was 98.

Is that what folks want?

An empty batting average?

The game has changed, strategy has evolved.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

RIght, it's just another stat!

So why do folks complain so much about it?

Why is there a thread bemoaning the low batting averages on the team?

In 2019 we had Hanser Alberto hit 305, he didn't walk or hit for power so his OPS+ was 98.

Is that what folks want?

An empty batting average?

The game has changed, strategy has evolved.

 

No one seems to be bemoaning it.  The OP made no editorial comments.  It's presented as an observation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was growing up, batting average meant a ton.  So I still hang on to that because like many fans, what you grew up with is what you love.  I really enjoy watching good hitting, and even though I certainly value OBP and understand the value of walks, I would rather see base hits than walks.  I just see it as a more impressive skill and I find it more enjoyable optically.  

I find it incredibly odd that there wasn't a single guy on this team by the end of the year who had a good BA.  We have certainly seen years where the team batting average was low, but the distribution this year for the Os was incredibly narrow.  Everybody was basically the same hitter.  

I absolutely enjoy baseball more when the hitting is better.  It doesn't have to be like the mid-1990s, but a league batting average in the low .240s is just not a fun product to watch.  I would much prefer a league batting average about 20 points higher.  And more runs.  Getting rid of the shift will help, because I can't stand rockets up the middle that get gloved by the shortstop standing behind second base.  But the fact that each team has about 3-4 relievers who can throw 99 mph makes it harder for hitting, and I am not sure anything can be done about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

No one seems to be bemoaning it.  The OP made no editorial comments.  It's presented as an observation.

It was a reoccurring theme throughout the season.  I saw, in numerous threads, how Mancini was leading the team in BA.  One poster even went so far as to suggest Mancini was the best hitter on the team due to the higher batting average(this was after Adley was promoted).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

a) The Federal League was 1914-15. Do I have to hold another remedial class?  I mean, c'mon, Baltimore Terrapins, the Supreme Court case that led to the anti-trust exemption, Jack Dunn moving the minor league Orioles to Richmond for a year because the Feds built their park across the street from his so 1915 is the only year since 1900 there were no Baltimore Orioles... this is basic stuff.

b) The Federal League was approximately as hard as A ball today

c) Batting average races are awesome, especially when someone is hitting like .390.  

d) No one really cares about batting average in a vacuum, but I certainly prefer a league that hits .280 to one that hits .240

e) The Majors hit .243 in 2022. Lowest mark since 1968, second-lowest since 1908.  With a league with as much depth and quality as we have today and a .243 overall average it's near impossible for someone to hit .350, much less .380 or .400.  So let's move the mound back 3'.

f) Strikeouts are driving the lower batting averages, because when you only make contact 75% of the time you have to hit like .375 on balls in play to have a decent average and that's very hard.  Again, let's move the mound back.

You do realize I like poking the bear because I like reading your responses, right?

Noted on the Federal League, but now I know what gets under your skin.  :) 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It was a reoccurring theme throughout the season.  I saw, in numerous threads, how Mancini was leading the team in BA.  One poster even went so far as to suggest Mancini was the best hitter on the team due to the higher batting average(this was after Adley was promoted).

The NERVE.  CoC, did you grump at that poster?  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BA has become a stat that is too undervalued.

OBP and OPS are more important but that doesn’t mean BA isn’t. 
 

Im wondering if good bat to ball skills is going to be something that becomes undervalued in the FA market?  Might be a way of adding some value to the team without spending a ton to do it.

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

BA has become a stat that is too undervalued.

OBP and OPS are more important but that doesn’t mean BA isn’t. 
 

Im wondering if good bat to ball skills is going to be something that becomes undervalued in the FA market?  Might be a way of adding some value to the team without spending a ton to do it.

And owknows suddenly froze as he realized he was standing on the same side of a chalk line on the sidewalk as Sports Guy.

 

(I kid... I'm finding more and more that if I read your words carefully, we often agree...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • What would a Yates/Scherzer package cost? I'm sure the Texans will try and give it until closer to the deadline to regain some ground on the WC race, but they are 8.5 games back right now. 9th in OPS in the AL and 9th in ERA. Nothing really screams that they will go on a run to make to back. The smart move would be to trade expiring pieces.
    • I just ignore those type of responses. FIP is clearly one of the better stats to accurately rate a pitcher.   I like it better than ERA.
    • This is actually a really fascinating question. Stats give you information, but they don’t give you all the information. “intuition” or “gut feeling” is the collection of uncollated data that every experienced manager has. There are always variables that cannot be calculated and the complaint here is that Hyde apparently ignores them. About last night, I would’ve been happy for Burnes to open the inning. Hyde knows how bad the bullpen is, so it is really on him for not delaying as long as possible( IF Burnes said he was done that’s another thing.) My complaint about Hyde has always been that he leaves his starter in too long, doesn’t get a reliever up until the starter is in trouble, and doesn’t pull him until after he’s loaded the bases, and then it’s too late. This was entirely different. 15 pitches an inning is entirely manageable. But to be fair, Hyde doesn’t have a good bullpen buffet from which to choose. I just checked and Austin Voth has .2 WAR in 35 innings and Bryan Baker has negative -.02 WAR in 10 innings, a 5.91 ERA, and he’s given up 11 hits in those ten innings. I don’t understand the judgement in dumping Voth and keeping Baumann and Baker I also don’t understand Mike not moving more quickly to address this need. The price isn’t going down, so he’s either going to grit his teeth, say his prayers and do nothing, or he’s going to have to pay the going price. OR he’s going to find Fuji 2.0, and we will all scream.  
    • Thanks for the info on Sharkey and Lord. Also, you brought this up in the draft discussion, but our 16th rd OF Qrey Lott from 2023 could still be signed. I would think in a “weaker” draft as this year is viewed, and a draft that we traded a pick for Burnes, that we would want to sign him. 
    • Asset management.  The team is doing fine w/o him.  He can be brought up when rosters expand allowing tenant to hold on to Urias.  He will be up the next time there is an injury for a position player.   
    • I’d say both Holliday and Basallo are victims of their own early success and people’s tendency to get over-excited by that kind of precociousness.  Both are having very good seasons at the level they’re at, and are way ahead of schedule for players their age, yet people are disappointed that they aren’t rocketing forward at the same pace of acceleration as last year.   Holliday has a 145 wRC+ in AAA at age 20, and Basallo has a 128 OPS+ in AA at age 19.  If they need a little more time to bake at the level they’re at, that’s absolutely fine.   
    • It used to be with the old ways of voting whoever was first got the start and usually the person who came in second was a reserve and they worked around the needing a representative from every team. I wish they just did that instead of the second round head to head vote.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...