Jump to content

"Moves that completely befuddle us" 2022-23 offseason edition


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Label it gratitude, flattery, interest, respect or whatever, I guess maybe it is a sign Elias likes him to catch Rom, Povich and whatever other future Orioles Norfolk has next year.     I think for Elias its more, "this is the catcher who worked with our coaches and pitchers in 2022 and knows our jargon, etc".    Tony's right there's hundreds of other catchers with his talent, but he's the only one with his rolling 12-months of human relationships experience.

That might be the closest to a reasonable explanation for this move that I have heard.   Maybe it's not the talent level, but it's that he has been involved for a year in the pitching development system that we have in place.   Like when an NFL team picks up a guy on the waiver wire that might not be the most talented but he has worked with the OC or DC before and "knows the plays".

I don't know.   Still doesn't make a lot of sense to me, and I'm still not applauding the move.   But it makes more sense than any other explanation I've heard.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Just Regular said:

Label it gratitude, flattery, interest, respect or whatever, I guess maybe it is a sign Elias likes him to catch Rom, Povich and whatever other future Orioles Norfolk has next year.     I think for Elias its more, "this is the catcher who worked with our coaches and pitchers in 2022 and knows our jargon, etc".    Tony's right there's hundreds of other catchers with his talent, but he's the only one with his rolling 12-months of human relationships experience.

Makes a lot of sense. When some of the details came out about the contract, this seemed like a likely scenario. Bemboom wanted to know where he was going to be and that he was going to be appreciated/paid. The split contract makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not see the issue obviously.  On one hand, I agree with Tony that the move makes no sense.  On the other, I agree with Frobby that because we don't know the reason, does not mean there isn't one.  I also fail to see anyone in this thread saying it's a good move or that this is an example of Elias' proving he is smarter than all of us.

It's a nothing move.  Getting a 40 man spot in Oct is likely nothing more than bookkeeping.  If he is on the 40 man roster when it is final, everyone will think it is a stupid move.  But no one thinks he is going to be on the 40 man roster when it is final.

Now, if the first FA contract is to Odor....well THEN, the genius of Elias will truly be exposed.

Until then, I remain equally puzzled.  I don't understand Elias' move or Tony's reaction.

Edited by foxfield
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Cave makes a lot more sense than Bemboom.

The O's have three guys on the major league roster that can play CF or LF at Camden.  Mullins, Hays and McKenna.  One of them goes down with an injury and the O's are short defensively in CF and LF.  

Cowser can play those positions but Elias is not bringing Cowser to the majors until Elias thinks he is ready.  And we have seen sometimes that takes a while.  Cave is a stop gap outfielder until Cowser is ready.

Santander and Stowers do not have the range to play LF and CF.    Vavra has some range but probably not as much as Cave.  Diaz probably does not make the off season 40 man roster.

Cave has an option left so he can bounce back and forward between AAA and the Majors.  Now he has signed a contract to Elias liking that pays him a lower rate in the minors and probably close to the minimum in the majors.

Cave kills AAA pitching so while he  is in Norfolk he helps offense.  He adds to Cowser, Ortiz and Norby who all probably begin the season at AAA.

JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Where does it say its a minor league contract?

It says split contract in the second sentence, the same term we saw used for Bemboom. My assumption is that is effectively a minor league contract with an option to turn it into a major league contract. Is that wrong? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

It says split contract in the second sentence, the same term we saw used for Bemboom. My assumption is that is effectively a minor league contract with an option to turn it into a major league contract. Is that wrong? 

I don't know.  It could be a major league contract with an agreed upon salary if he is optioned to the minors.  The article does not say enough to know.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Cave makes a lot more sense than Bemboom.

The O's have three guys on the major league roster that can play CF or LF at Camden.  Mullins, Hays and McKenna.  One of them goes down with an injury and the O's are short defensively in CF and LF.  

Cowser can play those positions but Elias is not bringing Cowser to the majors until Elias thinks he is ready.  And we have seen sometimes that takes a while.  Cave is a stop gap outfielder until Cowser is ready.

Santander and Stowers do not have the range to play LF and CF.    Vavra has some range but probably not as much as Cave.  Diaz probably does not make the off season 40 man roster.

Cave has an option left so he can bounce back and forward between AAA and the Majors.  Now he has signed a contract to Elias liking that pays him a lower rate in the minors and probably close to the minimum in the majors.

Cave kills AAA pitching so while he  is in Norfolk he helps offense.  He adds to Cowser, Ortiz and Norby who all probably begin the season at AAA.

JMO

Santander or Stowers could play left.  Maybe not at a Trey Mancini level lol but probably enough that I don’t need a Cave backup for that reason alone.  CF ok.. some depth and I don’t mind the signing at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

You can definitely do worse for a depth OF. He has an option and can (allegedly) play CF, and he put up pretty solid offensive numbers in his first 2 seasons in MIN (.262/.329/.466 over 163 games) so maybe they want to tinker with him a little at Norfolk for the first month or two and see if that guy is still in there. If not, NBD.

53 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Santander or Stowers could play left

In Camden Canyon, where you almost need a second CF to not let fairly routine flyballs turn into doubles? I'd rather not if it can be avoided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Are you directing that at me?    
    • I think probably what’s bothering people the most is that Holliday was hitting unbelievably well as of his call-up (.333/.462/.595), and he hasn’t been at that level of domination since being sent down (.259/.437/.445).  Plus, his K rate was 14.3% before the call-up, 24.2% since.   Bottom line, his meteoric ascent last year and his fast start this year set crazy-high expectations that he’s not quite meeting.   Personally, I’m not worried at all, but I’d like to see his post-return BA back in the .300ish range before I’d be clamoring for another call-up.   
    • I didn't say he was good.  I don't trust Akin with runners on. And certainly not in high leverage situations. The numbers show that as much. His numbers against lefties don't matter if he melts down when runners are on.  If they were that worried about a lefty masher Garver and know how bad Akin can be in these types of situations, then why put him in with Garver on deck?  I guess, to me, I leave Baker in. If he gets out of it, then Akin can sit down or if he comes in...pitch around Garver. The hitters after him aren't exactly Murderer's Row. Look at how he performed with nobody on vs. runners on (bases clearing double, 2 run homer)
    • I meant for both. Although thinking about it, Texas would probably want Beavers, they have the corner OF spots covered.
    • Yeah. Not your fault. Poor way they handle it. Don’t get it. 
    • Your link does say inherited runners allowed to score but that’s not accurate. I don’t get why they have it incorrectly listed that way. 
    • Do they? Is it? I'm pretty sure we've gone over the whole strikeouts don't increase pitch counts thing a hundred times. I think if managers wanted starters to go deep in games you would see more starters go deep into games. Is there one team in the majors in which the starters are going appreciably deeper into games? Baltimore is fifth in innings by starters.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...