Jump to content

What will the O's off season moves be?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

I misses the report of Clevinger partying that hurt his team.  Can you provide a link?

He was involved with Plesac. Here is one with comments from Adam Plutko https://factoryofsadness.co/2020/08/12/cleveland-indians-need-suspend-mike-clevinger-zach-plesac/

Passan says he flew back with the team (Plesac drove home)

https://www.nbcsports.com/chicago/cubs/indians-mike-clevinger-went-out-zach-plesac-chicago-sent-quarantine

 

Clevinger demoted as a result. Apparently there was a video where he and Plesac were less than apologetic:

https://sports.yahoo.com/indians-send-down-clevinger-plesac-virus-blunder-221630802--mlb.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, wildcard said:

You think picking the Powerball numbers is hard?  Its got nothing of pick the O's moves this off season.   Here are my guesses.

Lyles:  O's decline the option but say they may pursue him in FA.

Abreu:  2/35 plus an option to play DH/1B.  Because he has shown he can hit well as a DH.  His career DH splits are 290/352/493/843. His 2022 DH splits were 330/412/478/891.  

Just because a player can hit does not mean he hits well as a DH.  Remember Mark Trumbo?   His career OPS as a RFer 862.  As a DH 695.   Mountcastle career DH OPS is 733/ 2022 DH OPS 592.  Santander career DH OPS 704/ 2022 DH OPS 642. Pederson career DH OPS 616/ 2022 DH OPS 616.

Clevinger:  2/31 plus an option. He has career numbers that are less hits than inning pitched, and more strikeout than innings pitched.  He had a 4.33 ERA and a 1.198 WHIP in 2022 on his first season back from TJ surgery.   I think Holt and the O's physical trainers can get him back to his career 3.39 ERA and a 1.188 WHIP.

Backup Catcher:  Waiting for the non tenders.  I want someone who hit lefties and is a good defensive catcher.

I’m going Correa, Madison Bumgarner,  and Syndergaard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My #1 priority for the Orioles this offseason is to sign a top line starter (doesn't need to be an ace but a solid #3 with #2 potential, someone who could start a playoff game). 

I wouldn't like another bat, but I don't think you need to pay the premium one of the shortstops will command. A Josh Bell or Nimmo type would fit well. 

I'm also hoping that the Orioles lock up some of their own young talent long term 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, seak05 said:

My #1 priority for the Orioles this offseason is to sign a top line starter (doesn't need to be an ace but a solid #3 with #2 potential, someone who could start a playoff game). 

I wouldn't like another bat, but I don't think you need to pay the premium one of the shortstops will command. A Josh Bell or Nimmo type would fit well. 

I'm also hoping that the Orioles lock up some of their own young talent long term 

 

Isn’t Lyles a solid #3? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’d say Lyles would be fine as a no. 5.   Below average ERA but helps the bullpen stay fresh.  On a good team, a no. 3 needs to have an above average ERA.

Agree with this.  But if there are better starters available Elias should get one instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’d say Lyles would be fine as a no. 5.   Below average ERA but helps the bullpen stay fresh.  On a good team, a no. 3 needs to have an above average ERA.

Gotcha …. I thought Lyles was very competitive in many of his starts. I seem to remember a few really bad outings. I m sure not all 4.4 eras are created equal. If a guy gives you 7 out of ten starts gives you 6+ and 3 runs or less and the other 3 are bad is much better than the guy that gives you 4-5 runs in 6 innings every start. I check bbref to see if I could locate his QS stat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...