Jump to content

Catcher James McCann Acquired from Mets


LookinUp

Recommended Posts

So between Connolly saying this and what Nightengale is saying, I think it’s pretty clear that the plan communicated to him was to START all of those games.

Now, I’m not saying that’s what will happen and again, if they still bring in a good bat to be at DH, 1st, etc..then all is good.

But IF this is the plan, as is being stated, then an impact bat isn’t likely being brought in and yes, that’s very stupid.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

What does that have to do with anything ?  Was the roster 24 or 25 then? 
 

This bench if they choose does not have to use a traditional utility player. 

I'll try and explain it to you.

Teams carry more pitchers now.

That means that they have fewer guys that aren't pitchers.

It's harder to have platoons when you have fewer guys that aren't pitchers.

Roster construction has changed in the last 40 years.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'll try and explain it to you.

Teams carry more pitchers now.

That means that they have fewer guys that aren't pitchers.

It's harder to have platoons when you have fewer guys that aren't pitchers.

Roster construction has changed in the last 40 years.

I am well aware. The roster size was smaller then. That was my point. I know all of this. 
 

All I am saying is this team does not need a traditional utility player which in theory creates another player for the bench. I don’t know who that will be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

So between Connolly saying this and what Nightengale is saying, I think it’s pretty clear that the plan communicated to him was to START all of those games.

Now, I’m not saying that’s what will happen and again, if they still bring in a good bat to be at DH, 1st, etc..then all is good.

But IF this is the plan, as is being stated, then an impact bat isn’t likely being brought in and yes, that’s very stupid.

No way is he starting 80 games unless Adley is hurt or he hits like Frank Thomas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No, everything is stupid when it’s stupid. 

From Connolly’s article:

 

https://theathletic.com/4027312/2022/12/22/orioles-mets-james-mccann/?source=user_shared_article

 

Well, we’ve already established that he’s the Orioles’ backup, meaning he probably will start 50-60 games behind the plate when Rutschman gets a day off or serves as the designated hitter. As a right-handed hitter, McCann also might get some starts at DH when Rutschman is catching and other position players need a full breather. He has also played nine games (six starts) at first base in the past two seasons, meaning he could fill in there occasionally if needed. So, 60-80 games total seems like a reasonable amount for McCann in 2023.

60-80 is not 80.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of these moves are small potatoes.   There's some potential for minor improvements based  on Gibson/Lyles, Frazier/Odor, and McCann/Chirino.   Givens is a downgrade from Lopez but hopefully Baker makes up the difference.

I'm still expecting the corner OF who bats LH that Elias talked about and the #1-#3 pitcher.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

All of these moves are small potatoes.   There's some potential for minor improvements based  on Gibson/Lyles, Frazier/Odor, and McCann/Chirino.   Givens is a downgrade from Lopez but hopefully Baker makes up the difference.

I'm still expecting the corner OF who bats LH that Elias talked about and the #1-#3 pitcher.

I’d bet that Lopez and Givens 2023 will be similarly effective. Lopez was never going to continue being as good as he was in the first half of 22. 
 

Also, Frazier is likely the LH corner outfield bat and, if this offseason has taught us anything, the starter that Elias publicly stated he wanted us more likely to be a #5 with upside that anything close to an actual #1-3. 
 

This offseason sucks, have I mentioned that?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • No, not at all. Im saying guys who hammer the ball and show a lot of characteristics of good hitters are more prone to be good at hitting a baseball than players who don’t do those things. Yes he has a hole in his swing and if he never gets better, never develops and never learns anything, he is likely no more than a really good fielding, platoon guy with elite speed..which still makes him one of our 3 best OFers.
    • Looks like his 100 PA rolling xwOBA going back to the end of May has hovered between .330 and .360 for the most part, without ever falling below league average. That probably only covers his last 30 games though, which were better production wise at least than the 30 games before that.  
    • OMG, I just started a super similar poll/thread!! LOL!! It's now deleted.
    • I think Owen Murphy by himself would be a bit ambitious if he was healthy. Although FG has him as #10 in an admittedly bottom 1/3 system, he's still a 45 FV prospect and has a fairly large amount of helium. Just for reference that would put him in the same neighborhood as Beavers. Given that he just had TJS, he might be available at a discount, though If I'm the Braves I probably just wait rather than sell low. 
    • In order of preference to trade: Mayo Basallo Holliday Mayo is going to be a big time power hitter, but his defense just isn't where it needs to be. Maybe 1B eventually, but the Orioles just don't value 1B as a defensive position. They'd rather coach people up to it (see: Santander, Urias, etc.) or bring it outsiders (O'Hearn). Basallo I'm very high on. I have no idea about how his size and defense will play in the long run at C. His future might very well be a power hitting, LHH 1B/DH. But if C is in play, that is super powerful for this organization because you can rotate Adley and Basallo at C, and play Basallo at 1B when he's not catching. Holliday is special, SSS in the majors be damned. His ceiling is SS, but that is going to be at odds w/ Gunnar, so 2B it is. But the speed is there. I can easily see Holliday being a 20/20 or a 30/30 guy year in and year out w/ an exceptional eye/patience. That is incredibly valuable. And he's only 20.  There isn't a sizable gap between Holliday and Basallo for me on how special they both are, just so we're clear.
    • How do you think the unthinkable?               Mike Tyson:  With an ithberg.
    • Definitely would be willing to trade a lot more for Skubal considering he would have 2 additional years team control after this season if I were the Os. He would slot into Burns role next year as the TOR with Grayson after him 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...