Jump to content

Padres Finalizing Extension of Machado


justD

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, geschinger said:

I wouldn’t have minded. The more massive contracts for players mid/late 30s years that that a team like the Yankees commit to, the better for the Orioles.

When this translates into us finishing ahead of them in the standings and going further in the playoffs than they do, then it will truly be "better" for the Orioles.  Until then, it really just doesn't matter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

So .. in a completely different system than today … the New York Yankees from 1949-1964 won the AL pennant 14 of 16 years.  
And, of course, there were no divisions or playoffs so it was much much much more the case that every other city had ZERO chance than it is today. 

I don’t know anything about baseball in those years. My parents weren’t even alive yet. But to say that a $300 million pay roll and a $60 million pay roll are anywhere near the same starting line is disingenuous at best. I’m not saying it’s the Yankees fault or they’re ruining the game. They’ve actually done nothing wrong whatsoever in that regard. They have a larger marker, more money, and are more motivated to contend. The system that allows them to spend while other teams (like the O’s) are intentionally spending less than what they can manage is the issue for me. It’s the balance between the two where I think the game itself is eroding. From a business standpoint it’s arguable that the O’s aren’t necessarily doing anything wrong either. The owners want more money and since they’re the owners of the business so they can do what they want. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JR Oriole said:

When this translates into us finishing ahead of them in the standings and going further in the playoffs than they do, then it will truly be "better" for the Orioles.  Until then, it really just doesn't matter.  

You don’t have to look back too far to see how it translated in the past - look at the mid 2010s when Orioles were decent and the Yankees were old.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, geschinger said:

They don’t though.  They run those mid-30s players out there every day instead of upgrading at those positions (either internally or externally) and are worse for it.   Look at the production they got in the second half of Teixeira‘s contract and that one ended at age 36.  It would have been great for the Orioles if Boras had been able to have gotten him a 10+ year contract to take him into his late 30s instead of the 8 year deal he got.

That’s fair. I guess I should have said they just sign a new super star player to replace the production, not necessarily the player themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, geschinger said:

You don’t have to look back too far to see how it translated in the past - look at the mid 2010s when Orioles were decent and the Yankees were old.  

We have finished ahead of the Yankees in the standings exactly three times in the last thirty years (1997, 2014, 2016).  And they knocked us out of the playoffs both times we faced them (1996 and 2012).  I would certainly love to improve on those numbers going forward.  If they would ever finish under .500 (which hasn't happened since 1992), that would be even better.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, oriole said:

I don’t know anything about baseball in those years. My parents weren’t even alive yet. But to say that a $300 million pay roll and a $60 million pay roll are anywhere near the same starting line is disingenuous at best. I’m not saying it’s the Yankees fault or they’re ruining the game. They’ve actually done nothing wrong whatsoever in that regard. They have a larger marker, more money, and are more motivated to contend. The system that allows them to spend while other teams (like the O’s) are intentionally spending less than what they can manage is the issue for me. It’s the balance between the two where I think the game itself is eroding. From a business standpoint it’s arguable that the O’s aren’t necessarily doing anything wrong either. The owners want more money and since they’re the owners of the business so they can do what they want. 

There is no perfect balance in such a complex system as MLB .  But in general the system now allows all teams much more opportunity to be competitive than in the pre free agent days.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, JR Oriole said:

We have finished ahead of the Yankees in the standings exactly three times in the last thirty years (1997, 2014, 2016).  And they knocked us out of the playoffs both times we faced them (1996 and 2012).  I would certainly love to improve on those numbers going forward.  If they would ever finish under .500 (which hasn't happened since 1992), that would be even better.  

If the Yankees get back to consistently blowing past the luxury tax (which they might with Cohen in Queens to be compared against) that scares me a lot less than the Yankees approach of the mid/late 90.

I have confidence that if Elias is allowed to ramp up to what Os payrolls were in the mid 2010s a well executed Houston model will produce more sustained success than any team loading up on long term deals that include mid/late 30s seasons.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm happy for Manny and anyone who isn't is just bitter and mad for all the wrong reasons. Not locking him up is probably the most egregious mistake the team has made in my lifetime. They had the heir apparent to Ripken and didn't prioritize signing him to a long term deal. It's still pretty hard to fathom.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I’m glad this means he won’t be a Yankee anytime soon. We should’ve just given him the Chris Davis contract and he would’ve been the next Cal. That’s where PA messed up. Manny should’ve been paid first, then Hardy, Weiters, Davis, O’day. SMH. We had too many cooks in the kitchen. 

The time to sign Manny to an early contract extension was following the 2013 season. It was only a matter of time waiting for Manny to leave with each passing season and no agreement on a new contract.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

The time to sign Manny to an early contract extension was following the 2013 season. It was only a matter of time waiting for Manny to leave with each passing season and no agreement on a new contract.

 

I'd have tried to do it when he was rehabbing after his first knee surgery.

Promise him guaranteed money when he's laid up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • No, not at all. Im saying guys who hammer the ball and show a lot of characteristics of good hitters are more prone to be good at hitting a baseball than players who don’t do those things. Yes he has a hole in his swing and if he never gets better, never develops and never learns anything, he is likely no more than a really good fielding, platoon guy with elite speed..which still makes him one of our 3 best OFers.
    • Looks like his 100 PA rolling xwOBA going back to the end of May has hovered between .330 and .360 for the most part, without ever falling below league average. That probably only covers his last 30 games though, which were better production wise at least than the 30 games before that.  
    • OMG, I just started a super similar poll/thread!! LOL!! It's now deleted.
    • I think Owen Murphy by himself would be a bit ambitious if he was healthy. Although FG has him as #10 in an admittedly bottom 1/3 system, he's still a 45 FV prospect and has a fairly large amount of helium. Just for reference that would put him in the same neighborhood as Beavers. Given that he just had TJS, he might be available at a discount, though If I'm the Braves I probably just wait rather than sell low. 
    • In order of preference to trade: Mayo Basallo Holliday Mayo is going to be a big time power hitter, but his defense just isn't where it needs to be. Maybe 1B eventually, but the Orioles just don't value 1B as a defensive position. They'd rather coach people up to it (see: Santander, Urias, etc.) or bring it outsiders (O'Hearn). Basallo I'm very high on. I have no idea about how his size and defense will play in the long run at C. His future might very well be a power hitting, LHH 1B/DH. But if C is in play, that is super powerful for this organization because you can rotate Adley and Basallo at C, and play Basallo at 1B when he's not catching. Holliday is special, SSS in the majors be damned. His ceiling is SS, but that is going to be at odds w/ Gunnar, so 2B it is. But the speed is there. I can easily see Holliday being a 20/20 or a 30/30 guy year in and year out w/ an exceptional eye/patience. That is incredibly valuable. And he's only 20.  There isn't a sizable gap between Holliday and Basallo for me on how special they both are, just so we're clear.
    • How do you think the unthinkable?               Mike Tyson:  With an ithberg.
    • Definitely would be willing to trade a lot more for Skubal considering he would have 2 additional years team control after this season if I were the Os. He would slot into Burns role next year as the TOR with Grayson after him 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...