Jump to content

Grayson Rodriguez 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

I agree. I’m just wondering who is the most likely to exit the rotation. Hopefully the decision is based upon performance/upside and not other factors. Bradish and Kremer have both earned their spots IMO. Gibson is the anchor so probably between Irvin and Wells. 

 

As of right now, I'd say Irvin and Kremer are probably on the hot seat because they were awful in their first starts. I don't think Kremer should be given any more rope than Irvin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had great seats along 3rd base line. Dollar hot dogs were overpriced.  

Grayson looked incredibly more confident and poised as the game went on. Keep him up.  His fastball command was a lot better when he dropped his velo down to 95ish.

deGrom was absolutely filthy. So many of the Orioles whiffs missed by a mile.

Gunnar especially looked lost.  Body language was like somebody whose dog just died.

Edited by yark14
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, foxfield said:

Grayson is likely to get two more starts just because of the DL move.  I think he will earn his spot or get sent back based on performance.  It's not a bad problem to have.  If he earns it, whoever is weakest goes down.  Survival of the fittest.  

Does "whoever is the weakest goes down" still happen if you have a young guy making the minimum with options compared to a veteran you are paying millions to?   I don't think Gibson or Irvin are likely to go down, regardless of performance unless it is really bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

That was nice. Was his Mom on Twitter asking why he was pulled in the 6th? :D 

@Frobby better watch out before Mrs. Rodriguez becomes the new Mrs Bridwell. :D

Why, what did I say?  I said I had a gut feeling he would rise to the occasion and I hoped his family could make it to the game. C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SteveA said:

Does "whoever is the weakest goes down" still happen if you have a young guy making the minimum with options compared to a veteran you are paying millions to?   I don't think Gibson or Irvin are likely to go down, regardless of performance unless it is really bad.

That's fair.  But Grayson was supposed to be here.  IF he pitches and earns his place I think someone could be bumped to the pen.  I agree it won't be Irvin or Gibson unless either is hurt.  But again, I don't see this as a problem, more an opportunity.  IF Grayson pitches two more games like today he ain't going anywhere.  IMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

6 man rotation 

I actually like that idea. Then if you have an emergency you can just do what Tyler Wells did. Bump the next day's starter to come in the game and bail out the team. Then you're back to normal 5 days if an injury happens. Either way, everybody is rested enough to pitch when needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, foxfield said:

That's fair.  But Grayson was supposed to be here.  IF he pitches and earns his place I think someone could be bumped to the pen.  I agree it won't be Irvin or Gibson unless either is hurt.  But again, I don't see this as a problem, more an opportunity.  IF Grayson pitches two more games like today he ain't going anywhere.  IMHO

Unless Voth gets his curveball issues fixed, I think he's on the chopping block. He's out of options and he's costing them 2-3 million dollars to do the same thing a much less expensive reliever/call up can do.  His curve-ball has been hanging too much this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I actually like that idea. Then if you have an emergency you can just do what Tyler Wells did. Bump the next day's starter to come in the game and bail out the team. Then you're back to normal 5 days if an injury happens. Either way, everybody is rested enough to pitch when needed.

Guys who are starting need to be on a regular routine. I think a six man rotation limits the bullpen. They could drop Irvin or Wells to long relief and not have to send anyone down. 

Edited by ChuckS
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not like we have the 70s Orioles or 90s Braves rotation. I think the Orioles can cut it to five starters without too much trouble. If we're that deep, I'd prefer packaging two or three of them with some prospects and go get a top-flight starter at the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think you have to ignore PEDs.  I think you have to look at it under the context of: 1. PEDs have been part of baseball since the inception and continue to be a part of the game.  They are part of the fabric of the game whether we like it or not. Read any book about baseball from the 20s-70s and PED use was rampant.  2. In his specific era, MLB looked the other way, almost encouraged the use, and almost all players were using PEDs (whether that be needle use or other products).  Even if they weren’t using a banned substance, they were using some type of PED.   3. Players who admitted to usage (or even were very strongly assumed to be users) have never even come close to what he was able to do in every facet of the game.  What he did showed the absolute pinnacle of baseball ability/achievement.  He was the most entertaining player to watch while he was at his peak. The fact that he dwarfed all other players, who were using, in every part of the game (defense, base running, contact ability, swing decision, power) showed his greatness.  He was almost 2x better than the league average player over his career and for a span of 4 years was 2.5X better than the league average player.  He was the greatest player ever and we will never see anything like it again. 
    • I’m all for bringing Mayo up and putting Westburg at 2B whether Mateo is injured or not.   How much do you know about Mateo’s injury?
    • He has been outstanding, and, yes, whoda thunk it?
    • The ROY the year stuff is very debatable. I’d argue we are worse off losing a year of Gunnar Henderson than an extra pick. Now if Cowser won it, that would be different.
    • I know Mateo finished the game but there is absolutely no reason for him to tough it through that game injury. Just bring up Mayo and put Westy at second.
    • Why wouldn’t September days count? I think you were right the first time. https://www.mlb.com/glossary/rules/rookie-eligibility   In any case, I think it’s roster space much more than ROY eligibility holding Mayo in AAA right now. If he’d help them win more games right now he should be called up. If they get closer to a point where they can snag keeping him ROY eligible they may consider it - e.g., if they don’t make space at the trade deadline end of July, maybe they go a couple weeks with somebody else before calling up Mayo mid-August. I think it will naturally work out to have one of Holliday or Mayo be ROY eligible next year but not a priority for either of them. Holliday only had 2 weeks earlier, so I think he could be the callup when rosters expand September 1 and stay under 45 days (and that was perhaps deliberate in the timing of the decision to send him down). But I think, at a minimum, Mayo will be on the postseason roster to be DH vs LHP. We usually use Adley with McCann catching during the regular season, but obviously Adley will catch every game in the playoffs. So Mayo needs to get enough MLB reps to feel comfortable with him in that role at least.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...