Jump to content

WBC 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

Nice Will Smith homer.   

It hit me also as a good example execution of the coaching guys find themselves and/or get from their Clubs to optimize their launch angles, now unfolding with Norby and Cowser for me especially in our org.

Fangraphs Longenhagen I heard in podcast recently reflecting on Smith's development and how his swing now is just plain different than it was at Louisville.

Smith hit 9 HR in 400 PA in the ACC.    He slugged about .425 across 350 PA in the California League.    And has slugged about .500 across 1400 PA in MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2023 at 5:59 PM, Orioles4Life21 said:

Very. Everything with Cuba is political.

Not really their fault when it comes to the WBC, in my opinion.  What are they going to do, play a bunch of guys who fled the country?   

Honestly, the WBC is fun, but the criteria for who can play for a country are a joke.   Matt Harvey playing for Italy?  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Not really their fault when it comes to the WBC, in my opinion.  What are they going to do, play a bunch of guys who fled the country?   

Honestly, the WBC is fun, but the criteria for who can play for a country are a joke.   Matt Harvey playing for Italy?  
 

They are playing a bunch of guys who fled the country though. For the very first time they invited certain guys back. Others weren’t invited for various reason or, like Cionel Perez, wouldn’t accept an offer back even if they got one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

I was listening to MLB Network this evening and heard the story.  So cool.  To me that is one of the cool parts of WBC.  A Czech electrician striking out MLBers, a marketing executive managing GB, and a 21 y/o Nicaraguan getting a contract he otherwise might not have.  Good stuff.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Great Britain beat Columbia and could theoretically advance.

That could be problematic, their jerseys seem like they were intended for one-time use only; if they have to wash those things they may well fall apart and then they'll just have to get some white t-shirts and a magic marker to write GB on them. 

Screenshot-345.png?w=1000&h=570&crop=1

Edited by CharmCityHokie
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pool C tiebreak scenarios:

Mexico beats Canada, USA beats Colombia:

   -- Mexico and US advance (Mexico is #1 based on head to head tiebreak)

Canada beats Mexico, USA beats Colombia:

   -- Canada and US advance (US is #1 based on head to head tiebreak)

Canada beats Mexico, Colombia beats USA

   -- Canada and Colombia advance (Canada is #1 at 3-1, Colombia wins 3 way tiebreak at 2-2 because they beat US and Mexico)

Mexico beats Canada, Colombia beats USA

   -- Mexico advances as #1 at 3-1.   There is a 3-way tie at 2-2 between Canada, USA, and Colombia.   Head to head doesn't solve it because they all went 1-1 against each other.   Next tiebreak is runs allowed per out in games among the 3 tied teams.

Right now:

  •    Canada is done with 12 runs / 45 outs = 0.267
  •    Colombia so far 5 runs in 27 outs
  •    USA so far 1 run in 21 outs

So in this scenario, which assumes we lose to Colombia, to get the tiebreaker we need to:

   -- Stay ahead of Canada, which means allowing < 11 runs in 24 outs (Colombia is the home team so they probably wouldn't bat in the bottom of the 9th)

   -- Stay ahead of Colombia in this stat, which basically means they beat us by 3 or less.   Could set up an interesting scenario if the game was tied in the 9th inning or later and the bases get loaded.   Do you just walk in the winning run and lose by 1 and advance, or pitch to the guy and risk a grand slam and elimination?   Similar strategy if down 4 in the top of the 9th inning... play for one run, sacrifice bunt, etc?   While Colombia might bring the infield in with a man on 3rd and a 4 run lead to cut the all important run down at the plate.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Handley has been on IL since 6/8/24.  As of this morning, no idea if he will be returning to action after 1 week or if it is going to be time.  Only time will tell...  But the O's decided to give Banuelos a break from the taxi squad yesterday.  Am I reading into something?  Sure, but isn't that what we do here? However...  this week off of Handley vs. Hunt has given my son and I some more time to look at Hunt's 2024 history.  (I still think this is a SSS (small sample size) but since some on this board rejoice over 1 week of good performance  I'm going the other direction... bad performance.) As a precursor, I'm starting to think the O's fans need to brace for "something is better than nothing" when it comes to Hunt.  But what exactly is the "something" as it comes to Hunt for Baumann/Perez trade.  I believe it is also looking that we got "April Fooled" even acknowledging the SSS. Hunt's April stats with Tacoma (SEA): 12 games, 42 PA, 37 AB, 14 H, 2-2B, 1-3B, 2-HR, 2 HBP, 3 BB and only 4 K.   .378/.452/.649 for a 1.101 OPS   These stats would have OH screaming for Hunt over McCann.  This seems to have been the opinion when the trade first happened with Mariner fans as they were wanting hunt moved up to SEA. Since then...  well...  April shower's bring May flowers and maybe we got a carnation. 11 more games with Tacoma before the trade.  38 PA, 33 AB, 7H, 2-2B, 2 HR, 2 HBP, 2 BB, 4K.     .212/.308/.455 for a 0.763 now... the O's would have seen this as well... but the average over his 24 games before coming to the Tide wasn't bad.  .293/.372/.533 with .905 OPS.  This was still attention getting for sure.  But would the O's and OH posters have liked this trade based on just his May numbers? So... let's break down the 24 games with Tacoma vs. 12 games with Norfolk using some of Fangraphs stats/metrics: The 'highlight' and literally this is the ONLY highlight I can find.  (There is a 'candle' light as well) HIGHLIGHT:  In 12 games with Tides, Hunt has 3 HR (1:16 PA).  He only had 4 with Tacoma in 24 games (1:19 PA) CANDLELIGHT:  3 of 15 runners caught (20% for Norfolk) vs. 2 of 18 runners caught (11.1% for Tacoma).  But hey, this is an 80% increase! Here are some of the shadow numbers that 'fans' really don't want to look at because it flies into the face of 'HOPE'  Hunt's AAA wRC+ while with SEA in 2024 was 121.  Hunt's AAAA wRC+ while with BAL is.... 46.    Ooooffff. Hunt's BB & K rate while with SEA were 7.0% and 11.6%.  Hunt's BB/K rate with BAL are 0.0% and 36.7%.  Based on his walk rate... reminds me of a MLB O'S catcher.    Is the IL pitching that much better than the PCL?  Is Hunt trying to hard because of the H vs. H competition?  Hunt's SwStr% has gone from 7.7% to 16.1% between teams. Maybe this is a look into what other GM's saw and why Hunt is on/in his 4th MLB organization and still in MiLB. Last little nugget... like my dog kicking the grass after a piss... Since going to Tacoma from the Trade, Michael Perez has done almost the opposite!  His SwStr% has gone from 11.8% to 6.9%.  wRC+ had gone from 58 to 96.  His walk rate has tripled (5.7 to 17.9). His K rate has nearly halved (31 to 17.9). So... we aren't half way thru the AAA season and there is more time to compare our catchers coming up.  When and how Handley comes back from his IL stint is going to be interesting.
    • If Bradish is out for TJ, then I'd trade anyone for the right SP with 2+ years of control. We're going to need to replace Bradish for the rest of this year and some of next. Chances are pretty high that Burnes hits FA. So, we need 2 TOR SP next year. I think a proven SP helps us more than waiting to see what type of MLBer any of the prospects will be.
    • I don’t think so. Gibson is valuable and a great innings eater. But our pitching staff is in very solid shape to get through the regular season, no matter what happens with Bradish. The question is whether they have enough elite arms to maximize their chances in the postseason, which Gibson wouldn’t really help with. 
    • It also means the SP3 role is a casting call. I believe Dean Kremer and Cole Irvin can do things like Cody Bradford and Andrew Heaney did but process wise it isn't what you draw up.
    • Nothing scientific.  I just looked at the names and saw that more ML players or current top prospects came from those demographics.  By demographics, I mean 4, HS pitchers. HS position players, C position players, C pitchers.  That’s why I said, feel free to correct me.  You can go on BRef and scroll through each draft pretty easily.   I’m not about to get too detailed about it unless you disagree.  Then, I might.   
    • Here it is. This is from 2021, but he was brought up again in early April when many pitchers started going down for TJ surgery.    
    • And you think he'd have signed with the O's to be a long man in the pen? Do you think the O's would have matched that offer for a long man in the pen? Have the O's had a designated long man in the pen under Elias?
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...