Jump to content

The 2023 attendance thread


Frobby

Recommended Posts

On 6/11/2023 at 11:38 AM, fansince1988 said:

I was at the game yesterday, honestly was expecting more than 34k. Looks like they were not selling seats in LF upper deck, can't wait for that area to get repurposed. Side note: The concessions on the lower level are amazing compared to the upper level. Upstairs are dreadful. My son was relentless in his demands for chicken tenders. I buckled, and stood in a 15 minute line only to get to the grill area and have them tell me 5 more minutes for tenders. So we waited, and waited, and then the food was blah. They were $14 too. Never again :) 

I was at all three games this weekend. I love the grab your own beer shops. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Big Al said:

I was at all three games this weekend. I love the grab your own beer shops. 

Tell me more, apparently I've missed this. We always sit in Section 10, so we basically go from the south Eutaw gate straight to our seats and rarely venture away from our seats. I always know I should explore more, but if I'm there for a game I want to watch it in it's entirety, but I can always be bribed with easy access to beer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CharmCityHokie said:

Tell me more, apparently I've missed this. We always sit in Section 10, so we basically go from the south Eutaw gate straight to our seats and rarely venture away from our seats. I always know I should explore more, but if I'm there for a game I want to watch it in it's entirety, but I can always be bribed with easy access to beer. 

In the lower concourse, there are many beer stores, where you grab a can or two, self checkout and are back in your seat before the next inning starts ⚾🍺

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Going Underground said:

The hottest team in baseball with a big crowd.

 

I call BS on this. The A's have not drawn well for a long time. Oakland Athletics Attendance, Stadiums, and Park Factors | Baseball-Reference.com

Maybe it's Oakland, maybe it's because they play in the worst open-air stadium in MLB, maybe it's because the team stinks and is making no effort to improve. Maybe it's all of the above. But the fact they have an awful person as an owner and could draw 27,759 for a well organized protest of that owner doesn't remotely "prov[e] they'd support a team that supports them." That's 27,000-plus for one hyped game. Seventeen MLB teams average over 27,000 fans per home game.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I call BS on this. The A's have not drawn well for a long time. Oakland Athletics Attendance, Stadiums, and Park Factors | Baseball-Reference.com

Maybe it's Oakland, maybe it's because they play in the worst open-air stadium in MLB, maybe it's because the team stinks and is making no effort to improve. Maybe it's all of the above. But the fact they have an awful person as an owner and could draw 27,759 for a well organized protest of that owner doesn't remotely "prov[e] they'd support a team that supports them." That's 27,000-plus for one hyped game. Seventeen MLB teams average over 27,000 fans per home game.

Their stadium really does suck. I went to a game there in the early 80’s and it was bad then - and 40+ years have gone by since then with no significant upgrades.  I definitely think they could draw much better with an updated stadium.   But the government doesn’t feel it’s worth it, and perhaps that’s a wise decision.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spiritof66 said:

I call BS on this. The A's have not drawn well for a long time. Oakland Athletics Attendance, Stadiums, and Park Factors | Baseball-Reference.com

Maybe it's Oakland, maybe it's because they play in the worst open-air stadium in MLB, maybe it's because the team stinks and is making no effort to improve. Maybe it's all of the above. But the fact they have an awful person as an owner and could draw 27,759 for a well organized protest of that owner doesn't remotely "prov[e] they'd support a team that supports them." That's 27,000-plus for one hyped game. Seventeen MLB teams average over 27,000 fans per home game.

Do you think a team in Vegas is going to average 27K a game once the novelty wears off?

I don't.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Their stadium really does suck. I went to a game there in the early 80’s and it was bad then - and 40+ years have gone by since then with no significant upgrades.  I definitely think they could draw much better with an updated stadium.   But the government doesn’t feel it’s worth it, and perhaps that’s a wise decision.  

I have a crazy idea.  Maybe the billionaire owner of the team could build his own stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do you think a team in Vegas is going to average 27K a game once the novelty wears off?

I don't.

The hockey team draws well.  They are planning on putting it right on the strip.  I imagine they’d  have no issues filling seats.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

The hockey team draws well.  They are planning on putting it right on the strip.  I imagine they’d  have no issues filling seats.  

They average 18K.

The Lightning average 19K.

I'm not sure hockey attendance is a good reference point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oakland is a bad baseball stadium. Now it is Ring or whatever stupid name. Been there twice and dumpier each time. Been a long road and seemed to be looking for a stadium location forever. Jack London square was the last hope,but like the Call of the Wild they have Vegas calling 

Edited by Going Underground
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
    • 1. Where on the spectrum should Elias anchor between “let the kids play” vs. “sign proven bats”? 2. How do we get a right-handed bat to come here given Walltimore? 3. How many years do you think we should be willing to commit to a starting pitcher?  Where do you expect Elias to fall? 4. Between vets, rookies, and prospects, who can we trade / should we trade / do we trade for pitching or a bat? 5. What budget will ownership give to Elias? To what extent will he max out on his constraint? 6. What coaching and front-office personnel changes should/will we make? What about infrastructure or changes to org philosophies? 7. Whom, if anyone, should we try to extend, considering their agent and what they will likely demand financially?  8. For backup catcher, do we re-up McCann or go in a different direction? 9. Does it make sense to sign a blue chip reliever given the spotty track record of those signings (e.g., of 25 relievers signing for > $3MM last year, 2 had WAR of at least 0.5 in both fWAR and bWAR)? 10. Does Elias make any outside-the-box moves  (e.g., convert Akin to SP, sign a FA infielder, move JH to CF, find the next Suarez)?
    • Hope to take my kids but it will depend on the ticket prices.  I couldn’t believe how expensive the tickets were when they were in DC
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...