Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Gunnar isn't costing us wins, our horrendous starting pitching is. 

It’s never all one thing or another.   If it was a binary choice, I’d agree with you, but it’s not.  Both are making it harder to win right now.  And hopefully both will do better.  That’s what I expect to happen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s never all one thing or another.   If it was a binary choice, I’d agree with you, but it’s not.  Both are making it harder to win right now.  And hopefully both will do better.  That’s what I expect to happen.  

If he continues to struggle that certainly might be the case, but at the pace we've scored runs (so far this season) I think we'd be in second place, even our pitching had just been average/mediocre. Gunnar's struggles (at least at the plate) have been somewhat well timed because everyone else has had a hot bat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

We would be in 2nd place if McKenna catches a flyball.

The defense has contributed a lot to our pitching woes, that being the most egregious example, but far from the only one.  Anyway, I feel both the pitching and defense will improve, and the offense will regress.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DirtyBird said:

Gunnar OPS:

In Losses, .360

RISP, .548

2-Out RISP, .250

Late & Close, .143

Counterpoint, the Orioles are 6th in MLB in runs scored (5.59) and 23rd in ERA (4.96). Gunnar's bat (or lack thereof) hasn't cost them any games so far. Their pitching on the other hand...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Santander has a lower OPS than Henderson. Where's the angst about Santander? 

Santander has played in 453 MLB games so far.   Gunnar is in his rookie year.   We know more of what we can rationally expect Santander to do over a full year.  He hit 33 bombs last year with an OPS close to .800 in basically a full year.   Do we really have to preach about small sample sizes every single spring?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Counterpoint, the Orioles are 6th in MLB in runs scored (5.59) and 23rd in ERA (4.96). Gunnar's bat (or lack thereof) hasn't cost them any games so far. Their pitching on the other hand...

There’s no way to say whether Gunnar’s bat lost us any games.  For example, he came up in the 9th inning of a 5-5 game on Saturday, runners on 1st and 2nd.  He gets a hit there, we win that game 6-5.  Instead, we don’t score, it goes to extra innings and we lose.

WAR indicates Gunnar has cost us wins so far.  He’s at -0.2 rWAR, the combined staff is at +1.9.   Fangraphs has it Gunnar -0.1 fWAR, pitchers +1.2.   It’s a silly comparison between one player and an entire unit of the team, but you put it out there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Santander has played in 453 MLB games so far.   Gunnar is in his rookie year.   We know more of what we can rationally expect Santander to do over a full year.  He hit 33 bombs last year with an OPS close to .800 in basically a full year.   Do we really have to preach about small sample sizes every single spring?

No kidding. That was really my point. There's a tremendous amount of angst about very small sample sizes in this thread. SSS is misleading for every player on the roster, not just the rookies or the players that fans want/expect to succeed. 

 

By the way, Santander has a career OBP of .299 in those 453 MLB games. Having a sucky year is well within the realistic possibilities for Santander. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

No kidding. That was really my point. There's a tremendous amount of angst about very small sample sizes in this thread. SSS is misleading for every player on the roster, not just the rookies or the players that fans want/expect to succeed. 

 

By the way, Santander has a career OBP of .299 in those 453 MLB games. Having a sucky year is well within the realistic possibilities for Santander. 

The over dramatic SSS arguments, whether good or bad, are easily the worst discussions on this board. (Unless you want to count the game threads)


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Santander has a lower OPS than Henderson. Where's the angst about Santander? 

This isn't a Santander thread. But I think his role should be cut back also. He should DH only, be moved down in the lineup.

But Santander has broken out of a slump before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Gunnar OPS:

In Losses, .360

RISP, .548

2-Out RISP, .250

Late & Close, .143

He’s gonna take some lumps.  Who knows, it may be for an extended period of time.  I think he’s going to start gaining some momentum ,  Julio and Adley looked rough to start last last year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Let’s be clear. He’s pitching like an ace THIS YEAR. this is his first year in mlb and he was considered a back end starter when he was signed.  No one rational would say a 2.5 month performance in your first year in MLB requires the number one prospect in baseball PLUS MORE! Respectfully it’s lunacy.
    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
    • They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now.
    • Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. 
    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...