Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

 He has allowed WAY TOO many hittable pitches to pass him by being too patient. Once he makes that adjustment, he will be fine. The talent is all there.

Aren't they teaching the hitters that it is OK to not swing at boarderline strikes if they are the type of pitch they can't make solid contact with?

I don't want him swinging at a "hittable" pitch just to top it to second for an easy grounder.

Just because a pitch is a strike doesn't mean it's a good pitch to hit.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Aren't they teaching the hitters that it is OK to not swing at boarderline strikes if they are the type of pitch they can't make solid contact with?

I don't want him swinging at a "hittable" pitch just to top it to second for an easy grounder.

Just because a pitch is a strike doesn't mean it's a good pitch to hit.

They are definitely teaching that  and Gunnar is one of the poster boys for it.

I guess the question becomes should he alter his approach with 2 strikes. Personally I think he's fine and just adjusting to the league. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the pitches that he has let go were not borderline. He even let some get me overs go by early in the counts on more than one occasion. He has to be more aggressive zone at least until his confidence begins to pick up. He's a very bad 2 strike hitter at the moment and he's striking out way too much. It's like when he gets 2 strikes on him now, the only positive approach that we can hope for is a walk, otherwise it's an automatic out. He has fallen behind in the count way too much so far this year.

I don't want him allowing these strikeouts to pile up and get into his head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

Some of the pitches that he has let go were not borderline. He even let some get me overs go by early in the counts on more than one occasion. He has to be more aggressive zone at least until his confidence begins to pick up. He's a very bad 2 strike hitter at the moment and he's striking out way too much. It's like when he gets 2 strikes on him now, the only positive approach that we can hope for is a walk, otherwise it's an automatic out. He has fallen behind in the count way too much so far this year.

I don't want him allowing these strikeouts to pile up and get into his head.

First off we don't know his confidence is currently lacking.

Secondly I think the worst advice we can give him is "Hey swing at stuff you don't think you can make solid contact with."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

First off we don't know his confidence is currently lacking.

Secondly I think the worst advice we can give him is "Hey swing at stuff you don't think you can make solid contact with."

I agree with you.  He needs to hit the pitches he swings at, and maybe be a little less choosy with two strikes.  Meanwhile I’ll take the .365 OBP while he figures it out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

First off we don't know his confidence is currently lacking.

Secondly I think the worst advice we can give him is "Hey swing at stuff you don't think you can make solid contact with."

Fair point on #1. But that is a concern of mine. If success breeds more confidence, the lack of success can go the other way.

On #2 - I don't think either of us wants that. But maybe I'm saying that there is a such thing as being too patient and hunting for the perfect pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bemorewins said:

Some of the pitches that he has let go were not borderline. He even let some get me overs go by early in the counts on more than one occasion. He has to be more aggressive zone at least until his confidence begins to pick up. He's a very bad 2 strike hitter at the moment and he's striking out way too much. It's like when he gets 2 strikes on him now, the only positive approach that we can hope for is a walk, otherwise it's an automatic out. He has fallen behind in the count way too much so far this year.

I don't want him allowing these strikeouts to pile up and get into his head.

There's probably threads from last year saying the same thing about Adley, when he was being "too patient". I think Gunnar will be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webbrick2010 said:

I don't feel like doing it, but someone should post the stats for Cal Ripken's and Nick Markakis first 60 games in the majors, I know they were awful

They were also very young like Gunnar

It was really Cal Jr.‘s first 41 games that were a struggle.  .118 / .127 / .178 with only 1 BB and 17 K’s, a HR and 4 RBI.

He turned it on in the next 19 games, going .343 / .373 / .500 during that stretch on his way to the ROY award.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Let’s be clear. He’s pitching like an ace THIS YEAR. this is his first year in mlb and he was considered a back end starter when he was signed.  No one rational would say a 2.5 month performance in your first year in MLB requires the number one prospect in baseball PLUS MORE! Respectfully it’s lunacy.
    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
    • They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now.
    • Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. 
    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...