Jump to content

Bautista 2023


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

I agree with what seems to be the general consensuses in this thread about Hyde overworking Bautista. I agree with another member who suggested we shouldn't use Bautista again until at least Monday (which would actually be Tuesday because they have the day off Monday), but I wonder how the double header plays into this. The double header probably throws a wrench into the plan to give Bautista the weekend off.

One of my gripes with Hyde is how quick he is to yank a relief pitcher. He seems to yank guys after they get 2 outs, and rarely (if ever) let's them pitch more than 1 inning. I think the Bullpen would be in better shape if he'd give more guys the opportunity to go 2 innings, but then again what do I know? It seems like a catch 22 because in spite of my gripe, Hyde has been able to manage his Bullpen to a very successful low ERA and keep leads in tact. Maybe it's a trade off of taking on more fatigued pitchers for less runs scored in Hyde's professional opinion. I just don't know how he can sustain that style of managing over a 162 game season.

There was a time when you only needed around 3 pitchers in a normal MLB game and managers would let a middle reliever go for 2 or more innings. Those days seem to be long gone, or maybe it's just because I only watch the Orioles and Brandon Hyde.

But back to Bautista, I wonder if he'll be able to get any rest now with a double header scheduled. I have my anxiety about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

which is why he needs several days off.  Does Hyde want to be w/o Bautista for 2 or 3 games or 2 or 3 months?

Hyde needs to stop giving him every save opportunity. It’d be alright to throw Cano and Baker and Coulombe a bone every so often in order to keep Bautista fresh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Hyde needs to stop giving him every save opportunity. It’d be alright to throw Cano and Baker and Coulombe a bone every so often in order to keep Bautista fresh. 

Cano does have one save. Cano pitched 1.2 on 4/26, while Bautista pitched 1 on 4/26 an d 4/27. Cano was slightly fresher but arguably going to Cano for a second inning would have been over usage of him. As it turned out, both guys looked fresh and performed fine.

Baker and Coulombe both pitched in this game, so giving them the save doesn't help.

Coming into the game Bautista at 12.2 IP was in the mix with a bunch of the elite back end guys with around 12-14 IP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Bautista's usage is likely going to come down a bit, but he's currently on pace for 78 games pitched with 39 saves, 73.2 innings pitched and 140 strikeouts. 👀

 

 

I'm really REALLY glad we didn't give Hyde an excuse to use him last night. At one point it was 10-7 and I was like really, we're going to have a save situation in a game in which we scored 10 runs, give me a break. Thankfully we scored more runs...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

I'm really REALLY glad we didn't give Hyde an excuse to use him last night. At one point it was 10-7 and I was like really, we're going to have a save situation in a game in which we scored 10 runs, give me a break. Thankfully we scored more runs...  

It would seem Givens is going to be back really soon and I'm hoping it's this weekend or even this Royals series. Bautista can't keep being used at this pace where he's pitching every other game without him getting a tired arm or worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, interloper said:

I'm really REALLY glad we didn't give Hyde an excuse to use him last night. At one point it was 10-7 and I was like really, we're going to have a save situation in a game in which we scored 10 runs, give me a break. Thankfully we scored more runs...  

*run

Yeah I was really worried he'd use him.  This gives Bautista 3 days off in a row so hopefully he can get past some of the fatigue it seems he's having. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...