Jump to content

Joey Ortiz 2023


celery

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

Feel like when you signed Frazier you kinda made Vavra expendable.  Especially if he's not going to hit at all.  Frazier can "play" outfield and second like Vavra.  

I like this move.  Allows him to play second on games they want to DH Gunnar or give Gunnar a break against a tough lefty (Rodriguez).

Don't see Ortiz getting any starts at SS with Mateo there though. 

That really depends, I think. Henderson started at SS yesterday. Ortiz is a better SS. If Mateo doesn't start, it should be Ortiz that does. Perhaps they've seen enough of Henderson at SS to relegate him more to 3B. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this move and it seems to be very logical in that Ortiz definitely earned the promotion and fits nicely at 2B. He’s also a much better/higher ceiling player than Varva.

Maybe the O’s brass liked his defense over Westburg and Norby, which I’m fine with.

We still have a few more roster moves to go in order to get us closer to a more optimized/most talented roster we can have.

Hopefully, next up is Cowser to play LF everyday and then trading the excess infielders in Urias, Westburg (assuming they like Ortiz more), and Norby + for a frontline pitcher.

I really like our chances going forward if Elias plays his cards right! This is a good step in that direction IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, waroriole said:

With Mateo off to such a hot start, it seems like Westburg would make more sense. He has the better bat. 

We've been anticipating 40 man roster issues for years and it's finally here. The number of players we can punt who we don't mind punting to make room for a Westburg or a Cowser is few. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jamalshw said:

That really depends, I think. Henderson started at SS yesterday. Ortiz is a better SS. If Mateo doesn't start, it should be Ortiz that does. Perhaps they've seen enough of Henderson at SS to relegate him more to 3B. 

IMO Henderson has looked better at SS than he has at 3B. It seems more of his “natural” position. But of course nobody is unseating Mateo now, so that is irrelevant. And then it’s Holiday’s position in the long run anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

We've been anticipating 40 man roster issues for years and it's finally here. The number of players we can punt who we don't mind punting to make room for a Westburg or a Cowser is few. 

There are 3 very mediocre pitchers, who could be easily replaced on the 40 man. Names are Gillaspie, Krehbiel, and Zimmerman. 

Shoot for that matter, Vespi too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Absolutely. 

I don't think that's necessarily the case.  Ortiz being on the 40-man probably helped him I'm sure, but he may be the better prospect anyway.  I like both players but I think people may be selling Ortiz short and, IMO, possibly overrating Westburg a bit.

That said, Westburg is sizzling right now at AAA, so you certainly could have made the case for him as well.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The choice of Ortiz vs. Westburg is a tough one.  Obviously, the fact that Ortiz already is on the 40 man roster is a factor.  In terms of their merits as players, Ortiz is the better defender, z Westburg has more power.   Their numbers this year at Norfolk:

Ortiz .359/.389/.500

Westburg .323/.397/.585

Two very good options   The O’s do value defense highly, so I guess Ortiz’s advantage there and the fact that he’s on the 40 outweighed Westburg’s power edge   

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

I don't think that's necessarily the case.  Ortiz being on the 40-man probably helped him I'm sure, but he may be the better prospect anyway.  I like both players but I think people may be selling Ortiz short and, IMO, possibly overrating Westburg a bit.

That said, Westburg is sizzling right now at AAA, so you certainly could have made the case for him as well.

As hot as Westburg is right now, I think you can make a strong argument that he would have been the call-up if it wouldn't require dropping someone from the 40-man. I think that was clearly the deciding factor here. As far as the better prospect, I think it depends on what you value. Westburg has better pop, Ortiz has a better glove. I think they're both going to be good big leaguers. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, deward said:

As hot as Westburg is right now, I think you can make a strong argument that he would have been the call-up if it wouldn't require dropping someone from the 40-man. I think that was clearly the deciding factor here. As far as the better prospect, I think it depends on what you value. Westburg has better pop, Ortiz has a better glove. I think they're both going to be good big leaguers. 

Sure.  I think the 40-man issue was a factor.  I don't think it was the only one.  If it wasn't a factor I think it still might have been Ortiz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The choice of Ortiz vs. Westburg is a tough one.  Obviously, the fact that Ortiz already is on the 40 man roster is a factor.  In terms of their merits as players, Ortiz is the better defender, z Westburg has more power.   Their numbers this year at Norfolk:

Ortiz .359/.389/.500

Westburg .323/.397/.585

Two very good options   The O’s do value defense highly, so I guess Ortiz’s advantage there and the fact that he’s on the 40 outweighed Westburg’s power edge   

 

Just for another point of reference, if you compare their numbers including last season at Norfolk:

Ortiz .351/.396/.542 (42 games)

Westburg .281/.366/.520 (107 games)

Two very good options indeed.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...