Jump to content

What do we do about Jorge Mateo?


OsFanSinceThe80s

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'll take 2024 Holliday bat/glove over 2023 Frazier at second.  Or Mateo for that matter.

If we can hold serve, or improve, while not impeding Holliday it's smart to do so.

There is a good argument for Holliday beginning the 2024 season in the majors.    If he plays the whole year in the majors and finishes in the top 3 for rookie of the year the O's get a draft choice after the first round.

The O's did this successfully with Gunnar.   And with Holliday being minor league player of the year he could be in line to do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

There is a good argument for Holliday beginning the 2024 season in the majors.    If he plays the whole year in the majors and finishes in the top 3 for rookie of the year the O's get a draft choice after the first round.

The O's did this successfully with Gunnar.   And with Holliday being minor league player of the year he could be in line to do the same.

I’d rather have Holliday for another year than a draft pick.

Of course, you could just extend him now and not worry about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles have a lot of 40 man roster management decisions to make and I expect a plethora of trades and DFAs this Winter. There are many players in the organization that are floating around that cusp of being a DFA, part of a small lottery ticket trade, or potentially retained for 2024. 

This is where I feel Mateo fits in. He has value, but because of past performance, his tools, and cost he has different value depending on the potentially interested team.

Along with Mateo, you also have Hicks, Urias, Cionel Perez, Jacob Webb, Cole Irvin, Vavra, Akin, Dillon Tate, McKenna, Stowers, Zimmerman, Baker, Krehbeil, and Baumann

This group can provide value to other teams if Elias feels he can fill our roster with better value in 2024.  Of these 15 names, my guess is about 1/3 are DFAd, 1/3 are traded, and 1/3 are retained for 2024

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, wildcard said:

There is a good argument for Holliday beginning the 2024 season in the majors.    If he plays the whole year in the majors and finishes in the top 3 for rookie of the year the O's get a draft choice after the first round.

The O's did this successfully with Gunnar.   And with Holliday being minor league player of the year he could be in line to do the same.

I think it’s a very different situation in terms of Holliday’s chances of being a top ROY candidate compared to Gunnar.  Yes, they both were MiL player of the year, but for me the similarities end there:

- Gunnar was 21-22 this season.  Holliday will be 20 next year.

- Gunnar had a month of major league play under his belt and had already shown himself to be a solid major league performer in that month.  Holliday hasn’t done that.

- Gunnar had 295 PA in AAA at 137 wRC+.  Holliday had 91 PA at 109 OPS+.

- Gunnar had 208 PA in AA last year at 176 wRC+.  Holliday had 164 PA at 154 OPS+.

- By most accounts, Gunnar was further along defensively than Holliday is.

So, none of this is to say that it’s certain that Holliday won’t be ready to be a top ROY candidate next spring.   But I think Gunnar was much better positioned to do so, being older, more experienced and having performed better at the top levels.   Holliday might turn out to be as good or better than Gunnar down the road, but I think it would be asking a lot to expect him to be a top ROY candidate in 2024, at age 20, despite all his success this year.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...