Jump to content

O's should address the problem they have....


wildcard

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Mateo shouldn’t be blocking anyone the O’s can pawn him off to team with a terrible shortstop situation to make room on the roster. And while I’m a fan of Urias the Orioles can shift him to a utility role or consider including him as part of trade package to land a pitcher. 

That's fine, but until he's off the roster Mateo's technically blocking a younger player. We know Hyde has an affinity towards him. If he's on the roster he's going to play him. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

He has 5 pitches.  93m 4 steamer.  The cutter and sinker got hit in 2023 but were good in 2022.  That is a starter mix.

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/nick-martinez-607259?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb

Yet SD gave 15 starts to Rich Hill (50 ERA+) and Ryan Weathers (66 ERA+) instead of giving Martinez more starts. 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Wells had a 3.98 ERA in 20 starts last year.  Not sure why WC keeps talking about 15 starts of 3.3 ERA. 
 

 

 

It's not a mystery.   

In 2023 after 15 starts Wells had a 3.21 ERA but his first 5 innings were in relief.  He made 5 more starts after that and ended with an ERA of 3.80.

In 2022 after 15 starts Wells had a 3.23 ERA.    He made 5 more starts before be shut down with an ERA of 3.90.  

So in two different season Wells has been able to pitch 15 starts with an ERA under 3.30.  So I round up.   

Most of us know in those two seasons that Wells had arm fatigue before he was shut down.  So if we want him in 2024 at his best they should option  him after 15 starts  before the arm fatigue causes him problems.   Limit his innings in Norfolk to keep him fresh and bring him back to the majors for late Sept and the playoff when the O's will need a starter that can pitch to a 3.30 ERA,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, wildcard said:

Not a problem they don't have.

The O's have 4.5 starters.   Bradish and GRod are #1,  Means is a #3 with a career 3.74 ERA.  Kremer a 4/5.   Wells projects to give the a 3.30 ERA for about 15 starts.    That make Wells a #3 starter for half a season.    As we are seeing a starter with a  3.30 ERA is very expensive.  Especially if you want him to pitch 30 starts.   So don't do that.

Go get the other 15 starts.

We look at the projections for ERod, Giolito, or Stroman are 3 or 4 years in this market.   Heck, even Wacha and Lugo are projecting 3 years.   I just don't see Elias doing any of that.

And trading away the O's prospects with six years of control does just not make a lot of sense.  Not with Hays, Santander and Mullins are getting close to Free  Agency. (Yes, the O's need them to make the playoffs in 2024).  Cowser and Kjerstad are going to be everyday outfielders in 2025.   The O's have a year to development them.  I think Urias will be traded this off season and Mateo will make 2.7m.  He certainly will not stay in 2025 when a raise is coming.  So the O's need Westburg, Ortiz and Holliday.

My suggestion is to sign Nick Martinez 2/20m or 25m.    He can reliever in the 1st half and start in the 2nd half.  He projects to give the O's a 3.50 ERA for 100 to 110 IP.  That is the other half of the 5th starter.  

I would pitch Wells for 15 starts and then plan to option him to Norfolk.   There I would limit his innings to keep him  fresh.   And I would bring him bring to the majors for late Sept and the playoffs.   His 3.30 ERA would look real good in the playoffs.

I would sign a late inning reliever ...FA or trade for him.    Urias, Norby and Stowers are trade chips.  Who ever does not go in that trade gets traded for pitching prospects.

Irvin and McDermott are back up starters/relievers.  Starter depth.

I think this is more likely than trading away valuable prospects or spending tons of money and years  for a starter.

 

Characterizing the O's rotation status as just needing to find 15 more starts somewhere is not only whimsical, but borderline magical as well.

Last year the O's used 9 pitchers as starters - for perspective the Red Sox and Yankees used 13 apiece, and the O's rotation had relatively good health.  In other words, having 4.5 starters already is halfway there.  One more really good starter to go into the OD rotation and another in reserve like Cole Irvin to go along with Wells is a comfortable starting point.

Trading away prospects who deserve playing time but won't get it is a good way to solve at least part of that problem.  And if the thought of giving up six years of a prospects service time is painful, then remember the prospects behind them will also have plenty of service time to covet.  It's a dynamic process and Elias seems to understand that.

Does anyone really believe that Elias is going to use the 2024 team as a finishing school for prospects?  I think 2-3 over the full course of the season if we're lucky, and I'm as excited as anybody to see the rookies play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HakunaSakata said:

That's fine, but until he's off the roster Mateo's technically blocking a younger player. We know Hyde has an affinity towards him. If he's on the roster he's going to play him. 

Exactly.   Which is why I wanted him non tendered and now I want him traded or cut.  If he's on the roster he going to get playing time.  So get him of the roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, wildcard said:

 

It's not a mystery.   

In 2023 after 15 starts Wells had a 3.21 ERA but his first 5 innings were in relief.  He made 5 more starts after that and ended with an ERA of 3.80.

In 2022 after 15 starts Wells had a 3.23 ERA.    He made 5 more starts before be shut down with an ERA of 3.90.  

So in two different season Wells has been able to pitch 15 starts with an ERA under 3.30.  So I round up.   

Most of us know in those two seasons that Wells had arm fatigue before he was shut down.  So if we want him in 2024 at his best they should option  him after 15 starts  before the arm fatigue causes him problems.   Limit his innings in Norfolk to keep him fresh and bring him back to the majors for late Sept and the playoff when the O's will need a starter that can pitch to a 3.30 ERA,

lol…so, we just magically cut him off at 15 starts?

That is nonsensical.

You are literally admitting that he isn’t trustworthy for a full season and yet you want to hand him a rotation spot, which means we need to a reliever and another starter too.

Its an awful use of resources and poor roster management.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 24fps said:

Characterizing the O's rotation status as just needing to find 15 more starts somewhere is not only whimsical, but borderline magical as well.

Last year the O's used 9 pitchers as starters - for perspective the Red Sox and Yankees used 13 apiece, and the O's rotation had relatively good health.  In other words, having 4.5 starters already is halfway there.  One more really good starter to go into the OD rotation and another in reserve like Cole Irvin to go along with Wells is a comfortable starting point.

Trading away prospects who deserve playing time but won't get it is a good way to solve at least part of that problem.  And if the thought of giving up six years of a prospects service time is painful, then remember the prospects behind them will also have plenty of service time to covet.  It's a dynamic process and Elias seems to understand that.

Does anyone really believe that Elias is going to use the 2024 team as a finishing school for prospects?  I think 2-3 over the full course of the season if we're lucky, and I'm as excited as anybody to see the rookies play.

32 starts - the number of start Kremer had in 2023

32 starts - Bradish had 30 starts in 2023 but missed to when hit of the foot.  He should be capable of making 32 starts

32 starts - Grayson made 31 starts between the minors and the majors in 2022.  He should be capable of making 32 starts.

26 starts - Means has made 26 starter twice in his career. He will have a full off season to train.

15 starts - Lets say Wells makes 15 starts next year.

15 starts by a another starter

That is 152 starts.   That leaves 10 starts Irvin who has started 30  games  in two different seasons in Oakland  or McDermott who made 22 last season in the minors the last 8 of which he made in AAA and ended with a 2.49 ERA at Norfolk.

This does not count Hall who I have pitching in relief or Povich and Johnson who I have in the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

lol…so, we just magically cut him off at 15 starts?

That is nonsensical.

You are literally admitting that he isn’t trustworthy for a full season and yet you want to hand him a rotation spot, which means we need to a reliever and another starter too.

Its an awful use of resources and poor roster management.

I agree he has not proven he can go a full season without a break.   Optioning him at 15 starts and limiting he inning is the minors  saves him to pitch in the playoffs which is just smart management.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, wildcard said:

 

It's not a mystery.   

In 2023 after 15 starts Wells had a 3.21 ERA but his first 5 innings were in relief.  He made 5 more starts after that and ended with an ERA of 3.80.

In 2022 after 15 starts Wells had a 3.23 ERA.    He made 5 more starts before be shut down with an ERA of 3.90.  

So in two different season Wells has been able to pitch 15 starts with an ERA under 3.30.  So I round up.   

Most of us know in those two seasons that Wells had arm fatigue before he was shut down.  So if we want him in 2024 at his best they should option  him after 15 starts  before the arm fatigue causes him problems.   Limit his innings in Norfolk to keep him fresh and bring him back to the majors for late Sept and the playoff when the O's will need a starter that can pitch to a 3.30 ERA,

This is an odd answer. But, if you think 15 starts is his max, why not just wait until July/August to pitch him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

Exactly.   Which is why I wanted him non tendered and now I want him traded or cut.  If he's on the roster he going to get playing time.  So get him of the roster. 

I think the plan can be the O's break camp with Gunnar, Westburg, Ortiz getting starting spots and veteran Mateo on the bench.

After 6 weeks Holliday is promoted to start at 2B if he shows he is ready.   Elias sees how Westburg and Ortiz are doing in those 6 weeks and if one is struggling he get optioned.   If everyone is doing well than Elias DFAs Mateo and trades him for a minor leaguers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

This plan is the opposite of smart management. 

That is an opinion and not a good one.   Managing pitchers innings is done every years by smart management.  Last year Elias/Hyde went to a 6 man rotation to save starters arms.   They could easily have a plan to get the best out of Wells and to have him start in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Elias should be aggressive.  I think last year, a lot of the players were happy to be there, win the AL East, best record in the AL, great season.  They have a window of 3 to 4 years, be aggressive, you never know what can happen.  Go into the postseason with just Burnes and Grayson as your stud starters and a bunch of question marks and make an early exit again...the players might not be too happy that Elias was not aggressiv.  That could impact their staying in Baltimore.   One thing Ripken has said, it was great winning the World Series his second season, he thought he would get several more, never made it back there.   Go after it while the opportunity is there.  
    • I don't see Angelos agreeing to $11M for a half season of Scherzer.
    • You may be right. But I am sure the players (most/hopefully all) can tell the difference between the chances you have with Povich/Irvin starting and with Skubal/Crochet/Scherzer starting (especially in the playoffs).
    • I have zero interest in trading any of these guys, but I think Holliday is still a cut above the other two because he’s going to produce a lot of defensive value at 2B (or CF). I still have faith in his bat, his minor league production at the age/levels he’s been at (including after going back down to AAA) is too good to think he’ll completely flop at the MLB level. Basallo and Mayo are very tough. Mayo is a simply incredible offensive prospect, and MLB ready now whereas Basallo still needs some development. I’m more excited to see Mayo at the plate than any other of the recent Orioles prospects, I think he’s going to be amazing. But his upside defensively is still limited compared to Basallo. At best he’s an average 3B. Basallo at best is an above average C, and even if he’s just average or even below average (but startable) at C that’s more valuable. Mayo may have an edge as a prospect over Basallo just by being closer to the majors, but there’s a better path for Basallo to contributing defensively for the Orioles’ current team composition by starting 60-80 games behind Adley (in the next 3 years we have Adley).
    • Have we ever had this big a chunk of $$$ to spend on stadium enhancements before?
    • Is last year what he chose to do? Or was it what he was forced to do given the limitations imposed on him? Of course, nobody knows, but it is possible that Mike’s personal game is to try and find unexpected solutions. The Lopez and Mancini trades, finding Suarez and several of our successful relievers, O’Hearn, Urias, Mateo all waiver claims, can only be counted as unexpected victories. Flaherty and Fuji are among his uncommon failures. So there is precedent. Mike certainly doesn’t want to waste any assets, but I’m confident that he doesn’t want to spend them at all unless he has to. I think I am the only vote for him doing nothing and I certainly hope I’m wrong, but it certainly can be argued that he is confident that more waiver claims, or “down ballot voting” will get him enough to continue the momentum he wants.
    • Who’s got the cajones to give that guy the take sign?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...