Jump to content

MLB Offseason Moves/Rumor Thread


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I think you said that just so I'd post this:

Hey man, if you're into late 90s early 2000s female pop, there's not much better than this.  Not really my cup of tea but you do you, boo.

 

 

When I think of a genie, I go way back.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.aaabcd3270d534680579a42d646635b3.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Good gravy, has every offseason been this boring and moving at a snails pace?  I'm sitting here clapping back at Reezy with Christina Aguilera videos, something I NEVER thought I'd have to do but man, the amount of boredom this offseason is suffocating.

 

 

Remember this thread from last year?

https://forum.orioleshangout.com/topic/46786-in-this-century-has-there-been-a-duller-team-to-follow-in-the-offseason-than-the-orioles/#comment-2855928

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I'm surprised you made that thread so early in the off-season. I've seen people say it's "only" January 18 and that post was Dec. 16. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

I'm surprised you made that thread so early in the off-season. I've seen people say it's "only" January 18 and that post was Dec. 16. 

Of 2022.   But it was just a comment about every Orioles offseason since maybe 2004, not specific to that one.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

This offseason is making me Angry.

How can a song released in 2024 immediately go into the Classic Rock category?

Not me.

And to answer your question, if a song sounds like it was written fifty years ago it's "classic rock".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I don’t remember it, no. I also must have missed it cause I didn’t post in it. 

But it certainly applies to this offseason, posts from a year ago are still highly relevant today. 
 

It’s also getting close to late January, ST is on the horizon and JUST DO SOMETHING ALREADY 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I’d go even farther. I’m not trading any of top 4 prospects including Kjerstad. I would not trade Cowser as well. We still have a large amount of depth in the system. A trade example would be Stowers, Norby, Liranzo, Forret, Elvin Garcia. That is plenty to get a number 2/3 starter. 
    • Ugh I hope not. Please move on from players that were brought in originally to tank     unless you do this to replace Mcdermott at AAA
    • Here’s another list from “the other guys”. It doesn’t appear Holliday is eligible here, just an FYI: Os have 4 on this list including Estrada and Etzel.
    • I don’t.  He passed rookie eligibility two years ago.   
    • I think Fangraphs decides who’s eligible as of the start of the season.  Unlike other publications that release all their team lists at the same time, Fangraphs slow rolls theirs over a 6 month period or so.   Therefore, to put all the teams on the same footing, they base eligibility as of the start of the season.   
    • Clearly he has a roster spot for a playoff series with the Yankees….
    • My stance would be pretty simple. Im not trading any of the top 3 prospects and im not trading any of the young talent that is controlled long term that is currently on the ML roster. That means besides the very obvious guys that players like Cowser and Kjerstad are also off the board. Now, if a player like Skubal becomes available, that could cause me to change my mind but as I look around at the reported available players, I don’t see anyone worth a top 20 prospect or young contributing ML talent. Guys like Norby and Stowers fall into that latter category but they aren’t here right now and they are just redundant on our roster. So I’m telling teams if you want to deal with us, guys like Norby, Stowers and Beavers are who will lead deals and that several vets, led by Mountcastle, are also on the board in any potential contender/contender(fringe contender) type deal. I think whether it’s Fedde or relievers like Estevez or Nardi or Garcia or even Scott, I think we have enough to get deals done without trading any of the guys we would rather not lose. This is all to say that I just don’t see that proven elite high end talent available this deadline to justify trading any of those top guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...