Jump to content

RIP: Ryan Minor


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Not that I know the circumstances of Minor not catching his colon cancer, but most colon cancers can be caught with vigilance.  If you have anything that seems like a weird change in your bowel movements, frequent diarrhea or constipation, ongoing stomach discomfort, unexplained weight loss, odd weakness or tiredness, or especially blood in your stool--get it checked out.  You know your body.  You know how it normally works.  Don't assume anything.  

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, baltfan said:

Not that I know the circumstances of Minor not catching his colon cancer, but most colon cancers can be caught with vigilance.  If you have anything that seems like a weird change in your bowel movements, frequent diarrhea or constipation, ongoing stomach discomfort, unexplained weight loss, odd weakness or tiredness, or especially blood in your stool--get it checked out.  You know your body.  You know how it normally works.  Don't assume anything.  

All of the above, plus I'd strongly advise a regular (every two or three years) colonoscopy when you hit the mid '40s. My youngest brother passed from colon cancer in July at age 53. Two summers ago he saw a doctor about what appeared to be a slight stomach ache. They sent him for some scans and next day he got the call it was stage four colon cancer. He'd never had a colonoscopy in his life, wasn't even on his radar. Having the procedure is no big deal, and it just might save you and your family from the hell that Ryan Minor and his family is going through now. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know on here Ryan Minor is best known for being the guy who replaced Cal in the starting lineup to end the streak, but I remember him better for his college basketball career at Oklahoma.

Minor was an accomplished basketball player winning the Big 8 Player of the Year award in 1995. Prayers to Ryan and his family he's way too young for this.

FPwYcLRUYAkiqhA?format=jpg&name=4096x409

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ShoelesJoe said:

All of the above, plus I'd strongly advise a regular (every two or three years) colonoscopy when you hit the mid '40s. My youngest brother passed from colon cancer in July at age 53. Two summers ago he saw a doctor about what appeared to be a slight stomach ache. They sent him for some scans and next day he got the call it was stage four colon cancer. He'd never had a colonoscopy in his life, wasn't even on his radar. Having the procedure is no big deal, and it just might save you and your family from the hell that Ryan Minor and his family is going through now. 

I do not think doctors recommend a colonoscopy every 2-3 years unless they perform one and find polyps.  If there are no polyps, it’s a five year gap before the next one.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I do not think doctors recommend a colonoscopy every 2-3 years unless they perform one and find polyps.  If there are no polyps, it’s a five year gap before the next one.

 

Depends on your age.  I had one this year at 49 and I'm good for 7-10 years, which is the standard answer all of my friends are getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, baltfan said:

Not that I know the circumstances of Minor not catching his colon cancer, but most colon cancers can be caught with vigilance.  If you have anything that seems like a weird change in your bowel movements, frequent diarrhea or constipation, ongoing stomach discomfort, unexplained weight loss, odd weakness or tiredness, or especially blood in your stool--get it checked out.  You know your body.  You know how it normally works.  Don't assume anything.  

"most colon cancers can be caught with vigilance"

If you're over 50 and have good insurance, then maybe. I don't think insurance covers colonoscopy procedures for preventative purposes until you're 50.....although I think that age may be trending down to 45.

I just had a 2cm polyp removed....my doctor said it absolutely would have become cancerous at some point. I'm 43. The only reason I was even able to have the colonoscopy done was because I embellished some symptoms a bit and I had a bad bout of colitis when I was younger, so I had some "history". 

I had a friend die last year from it, she was 46. I know another guy who died recently in his mid-40s from it....and I know another guy who has it now who is only about 41ish.

Colon cancer is a mfer. By the time you have symptoms and go to the doctor, it's probably too late.

 

 

Edited by CP0861
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

I do not think doctors recommend a colonoscopy every 2-3 years unless they perform one and find polyps.  If there are no polyps, it’s a five year gap before the next one.

 

This is correct.

My advice, if you are 45 or over - get a colonoscopy done.  If you have to, tell your doctor you've been bleeding.

Edited by CP0861
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Ripken said:

Depends on your age.  I had one this year at 49 and I'm good for 7-10 years, which is the standard answer all of my friends are getting.

Not necessarily age-I just had one done last month, tiny non cancerous polyp and at age 62 I was given 10 years until another colonoscopy.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2023 Screening Recommendations:

Recent screening guidelines recommend anyone with an average risk of developing colorectal cancer should be screened starting at age 45.

Screening guidelines by age are:

45-75 — colonoscopy every 10 years for average-risk patients

76-85 — selective testing based on individual factors, such as overall health, life expectancy, and previous screening history

85 and up — not recommended

Your doctor may recommend screening younger than 45 if you have increased risk factors.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10182334/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Hamilton needs to really improve on coverage of TEs.
    • Some quick recaps of the matchups against KC, as they happened so long ago that they’re genuinely tough to remember. Game 1 (@BAL): Orioles win 6-4.  Dean Kremer vs. Michael (Wacha) Wacha. Kremer escapes a brutal 1st inning with two errors (Urias; Henderson). After that, the pitchers mostly cruise until T3, when Kremer gives up a bomb to Witt, followed by a walk and a Perez bomb for a 3-0 KC lead. The O’s bats storm back, matching those 3 runs in B4, with Rutschman double and a Mountcastle HR providing the highlights. Not much action until T8, when Cano gets into and works out of a huge jam (2nd and 3rd, none out) to preserve the tie. In B8, three singles culminate in a Mountcastle RBI to take the lead. Kimbrel promptly blows said lead in T9, giving up a single to Isbel and two mostly uncontested SBs to PR Blanco, who trots home on a sac fly. In B9, Mullins singles with one out against RP Nick Anderson and Westburg sends the fans home happy with an opposite field walk-off blast.  Game 2 (@BAL): Royals win 4-1 Cole Irvin vs. Alec Marsh. Much less intrigue in this one. Irvin didn’t have it, giving up four, that could have been more. Garcia did most of the damage, with a double and triple that brought home 3 runs. Marsh mostly stymied the O’s bats, with Cowser’s double in B3 providing the only run. Smith closed it out for KC. Game 3 (@ BAL): Orioles win 4-3 Corbin Burnes vs. Cole Ragans. This one looked like it was headed the way of the visitors, as Ragans dominated through 6.1 innings of one-hit ball. The Royals had a load of traffic against Burnes, with 9 hits and a couple walks. The O’s did well to minimize the damage. Perez provided two RBI singles against Burnes, but his ponderous baserunning also kept him from scoring both times. KC added a 3rd run against Baumann in T7, on a homer by Garcia. Once Ragans finally exited, the O’s came alive, with RP James McArthur yielding two runs in B8. Cowser singled and was followed by a double from McCann. They each came home, on a Firestone by Henderson and a clutch 2-out single by Rutschman, to bring the score to 3-2. Smith again came on to close it out for KC, and he was greeted rudely. The bases were loaded for Cowser, who struck out. He was followed by McCann, however, who delivered the walk-off two-run single. Great rejoicing. Game 4 (@ KC): Royals win 9-4 Dean Kremer vs. Alec Marsh. Both guys largely matched what they’d done a couple weeks earlier. Kremer pitched into the 6th, with the only blemish until that point being a B4 solo shot by Pasquantino. Marsh pitched out of a couple jams, first picking off Henderson at 3B to snuff out a T1 2nd/3rd threat, then getting a popup from Mullins and a groundout from Cowser to escape a T4 bases loaded conundrum. B6 was a nightmare for the O’s, with Kremer getting two outs but also issuing two BBs. Akin was called on, and promptly set the whole thing ablaze, giving up RBI hits to Melendez, Massey, and Renfroe to make it 6-0. In T7, Rutschman answered with a grand slam off of possible double agent Smith to draw closer. But in B7, Melendez hit a 3-run bomb off of Tate to provide the final margin. Game 5 (@ KC): Orioles win 9-7 Corbin Burnes vs. Cole Ragans. As expected, a pitcher’s duel. Ragans came out hot, striking out the side in T1. His luck turned, though, in T2. The Orioles BABIP’d him to death, recording 8 hits in the frame. A two-run single by Westburg made it 7-0 and sent Ragans to the showers. Burnes was solid, though unspectacular, until yielding a B6 Weaver to Perez that ended his night. After the O’s manufactured a run in T7, an uncharacteristically wild outing from Coulombe was followed by a characteristically wild outing from Yohan Ramirez, with yet another big hit from Perez providing 2 RBIs to close to 8-7. Kauffman was in a frenzy. In T8, though, Mountcastle and Santander slammed back-to-back doubles off RP John Schreiber to make it 9-7. Akin and Baumann survived the bottom of the order in B8, and Kimbrel closed it out in orderly fashion in T9. Game 6 (@ KC): Orioles win 5-0  Cole Irvin vs. Seth Lugo. A mismatch on paper, and indeed it proved to be. Irvin survived B1 turmoil and then absolutely locked things down. Lugo was ambushed with back-to-back blasts from Westburg and Cowser to start T3, and then pitched his way into trouble in T6. A triple (?) by Santander was followed by a Mountcastle RBI double. Eventually RP Angel Zerpa walked in another run, but he did dodge further damage by striking out both Holliday and Henderson with the bases still loaded. Urias provided the final blow with a T9 single that drove home Henderson, and the Orioles bullpen locked down the shutout.
    • I have no hard evidence to back it up, but it seems I've observed the O's this season have adhered to a "traditional" righties vs. lefties and lefties vs. righties mentality.  Damn the reverse splits!
    • KC actually has more than 1 guy who can shut you down.
    • Not sure how you don't have a spy for Allen on 3rd and 5.
    • Let's stuff this!!! Don't jump offside.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...