Jump to content

Mewleski: The infield depth seems to be leading to one conclusion – a trade is coming.


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

Quote

The infield depth seems to be leading to one conclusion – a trade is coming. Because it has not so far doesn’t mean it won’t. But the Orioles don’t have to make a trade, which puts them in good bargaining position. Mike Elias stated during the Winter Meetings that they can trade with just about any club in the majors in terms of their strong minor league depth and strong prospects list.

Teams often look to make trades from their depth – trade that of which you have a surplus.

The O’s prospects lists with infielders and outfielders shows plenty of depth. Less so probably among the arms.

To me, considering the depth of talent here, a deal seems likely, almost inevitable


I agree but you have to wonder when Elias is going to pull the trigger.

 

 

https://www.masnsports.com/blog/is-a-trade-inevitable-for-the-orioles

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:


I agree but you have to wonder when Elias is going to pull the trigger.

 

 

https://www.masnsports.com/blog/is-a-trade-inevitable-for-the-orioles

As Mewleski said, Elias doesn't need to do anything... yet.  Naturally when there is a logjam of prospects pushing their way up for playing time, it's a great "problem" to have.  Injuries may occur at a position or two, or in some cases prospects will just be better options to take over.  Either way, at some point, a trade or three seems inevitable.  If not this Winter, then by the deadline I'd think.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Change it to "The infield depth seems to be leading to one conclusion – a trade should be coming," and I'm fully on board.

Elias has been extremely cautious and risk-averse when it comes to using dollars or talented players to bring in talent with established major league value. That trait (along with ownership's stinginess and profit-hoarding) has made him very reluctant to trade a guy who, while not likely to get many ABs with the Orioles (and, in some cases, may not even get a roster spot for another year), might blossom into an All Star-level player if traded.

That speculation is strengthened by the fact that the centerpiece of the trade likely would be for a starter or starters who could be shelved due to injury at any time. You can throw in the fact that Elias has never made a "big trade" in which he parts with high-level (or potentially high-level) talent, or a big-dollar free-agent signing, and surely doesn't want to sully the strong reputation he's built by making his first big trade or signing one that turns out badly: any of the IFs he would trade could be a valuable, Adam Jones-caliber major leaguer for a long time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most of us have been saying this for months. It just seems to drag on FOREVER. We have too many infielders and outfielders and need a good, young starting pitcher. I keep waiting on Elias to make it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Greg Pappas said:

As Mewleski said, Elias doesn't need to do anything... yet.  Naturally when there is a logjam of prospects pushing their way up for playing time, it's a great "problem" to have.  Injuries may occur at a position or two, or in some cases prospects will just be better options to take over.  Either way, at some point, a trade or three seems inevitable.  If not this Winter, then by the deadline I'd think.

 

It's only a great problem to have if you take advantage of the situation to improve the team as a whole. Otherwise it's a huge missed opportunity. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jagwar said:

Unfortunately, I think other teams want pitching, which is not a part of the O's organizational depth. 

I read that the Marlin or Mariners (don’t remember which)have a middle infielder after a loss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Dipoto needs a COF and a productive DH. We could certainly dangle Mountcastle, O’Hearn , Hays, and or Santander. Dipoto is a dealer and doesn’t have to be a clear winner to make a deal.

What about Mountcastle, and Cowser to start a deal or Santander and Irvin to start a deal or Hays and Ortiz? Obviously we’d need to add something else but should be enough pieces to find a deal.

 

https://www.mlb.com/news/mariners-remaining-offseason-needs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

Change it to "The infield depth seems to be leading to one conclusion – a trade should be coming," and I'm fully on board.

Elias has been extremely cautious and risk-averse when it comes to using dollars or talented players to bring in talent with established major league value. That trait (along with ownership's stinginess and profit-hoarding) has made him very reluctant to trade a guy who, while not likely to get many ABs with the Orioles (and, in some cases, may not even get a roster spot for another year), might blossom into an All Star-level player if traded.

That speculation is strengthened by the fact that the centerpiece of the trade likely would be for a starter or starters who could be shelved due to injury at any time. You can throw in the fact that Elias has never made a "big trade" in which he parts with high-level (or potentially high-level) talent, or a big-dollar free-agent signing, and surely doesn't want to sully the strong reputation he's built by making his first big trade or signing one that turns out badly: any of the IFs he would trade could be a valuable, Adam Jones-caliber major leaguer for a long time.

 

Or the IF prospects could turn out to be Ryan Flaherty .. risks always exist but Elias results are only thing that matters 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Lol!  Correct, dude! I'm not against anything.  I just feel like maybe the expectations are a little higher than they need to be.  We don't need a number one SP - I mean, it would be great, but the value/cost at this moment would be bad, imo.  So I think there's the chance he's shopping at Ollie's.  Nothing wrong with that to me.  I'm just wondering if there are targets out there that someone is familiar with that would cost little instead of the guys being talked about - top prospects, Kjerstadt, etc. Other than Buddy Groom, LOL, there are no answers.  Fuji was almost equivalent to what I'm talking about here.  I just don't know who as I don't watch games around the league as I know many others here do.
    • Mayo.  His 2024 numbers are incredible, so you’re selling high as far as prospects go.  But his defense is a question mark and as this year shows, he has the least clear path to the majors of the group. Some of that is because of his age relative JH and SB, but it’s clear that JH and SB have clear rolls on this team once they are ready.  Mayo’s path is less clear. 
    • I'm coming around to this idea more and these are all good points, but I still wouldn't give up a whole lot for him.  His season so far this year is giving me a bit of Austin Voth 2022 vibes.  83 IP for us with a 3.04 ERA, 3.96 FIP, 8.3 H/9, 1.1 HR/9, 2.7 BB/9, 7.8 K/9...then he went back to being the Austin Voth he always was.  Maybe it's that they both pitched for the Nationals for a bit at the beginning of their careers, but both careers prior to their "breakout" 2022 and 2024 seasons, respectively, along with their numbers in their "breakout" seasons are eerily similar. I'm not dismissing the idea that he has figured something out, I'm just not willing to risk much betting that he has. 
    • I'm expecting the All-Star game soon. I would have said as quickly as possible after the sale but now I think they will wait until the renovations are complete.
    • I don't like the idea of parting with significant prospects for marginal players. For comparison's sake, we traded for Flaherty last year and gave up basically nothing. Flaherty (even mid season last year) is about as good as some of the guys we are thinking of trading real prospects for. Even if you get an additional year(s) of control, guys like Efflin I'm not trading someone like Norby for. I think we can do better if we are going to jet out the Norbys and Beavers of the world.
    • Maybe we can have an all star game and winter classic in the near future too!
    • I would consider Fedde the main aisle along with relievers like Scott and Estevez.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...