Jump to content

This offseason will tell us a lot about Elias


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Otter said:

I don't remember the general consensus back then, but I do remember I was not that happy with the trade at the time it was made.  Two promising young pitchers with a lot of upside, and Finley was one of my favorite players.  And part of the best outfield in O's history in my opinion...  

Better than Buford, Blair and Robinson? No chance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jagwar said:

Better than Buford, Blair and Robinson? No chance

Defensively it was very good, probably better than that group despite Blair’s greatness.  However, people don’t realize that Anderson, Devereaux and Finley were rarely on the field together.   They had Orsulak and Phil Bradley out there a good bit of the time.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Never understood how Brady Anderson never won a Gold Glove.  Maybe he wasn't as good of a defender as I remember but I used to think he was awesome.

I once met a chick at the beach & we went back to her hotel room and watched the Orioles game. She watched Brady Anderson do his thing and it totally put her in the mood. True story. 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2024 at 8:00 AM, Just Regular said:

1. Its fine for John Means, Dean Kremer and Tyler Wells to pitch games 3, 4 and 5 in spring.

2. Its not fine (at least not that we can see yet) for any of them to pitch game 3 in fall.

Sigbot likes minimizing risk, but you really don't want Adley year 3 of 6 to end in ALWC Game 3 with a Kyle Gibson type pitcher getting blown out.

I think you're exaggerating to make a point. We've seen a Scherzer and Verlander and Kershaw getting blown out in a playoff game too. It's just a matter of odds. And if you have a 3.50 ERA pitcher vs. a 4.00 ERA pitcher at your #3 spot, it's pretty in-Sig-nificant in the super-small sample size of a playoff game or two.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

Defensively it was very good, probably better than that group despite Blair’s greatness.  However, people don’t realize that Anderson, Devereaux and Finley were rarely on the field together.   They had Orsulak and Phil Bradley out there a good bit of the time.  

In 1989 Anderson/Devereaux/Finley had WAR of 0.3/2.3/0.4. Bradley 2.9 and Orsulak 2.0. The 5 had a combined WAR of 7.9

In 1969 Buford/Blair/Robinson had WAR of 7.1/4.8/7.5 (combined 19.4). In 1970 it was 5.8/4.5/4.8 (combined 15.1)

It's not even close

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I once met a chick at the beach & we went back to her hotel room and watched the Orioles game. She watched Brady Anderson do his thing and it totally put her in the mood. True story. 

I used to have seats in the LF bleachers directly behind where Brady would stand in LF.  First time I took my wife she commented, “that guy has a cute butt.”  About five minutes later, a couple sits down in the row in front of us and the woman says to her guy, “that guy has a cute butt.”   

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jagwar said:

In 1989 Anderson/Devereaux/Finley had WAR of 0.3/2.3/0.4. Bradley 2.9 and Orsulak 2.0. The 5 had a combined WAR of 7.9

In 1969 Buford/Blair/Robinson had WAR of 7.1/4.8/7.5 (combined 19.4). In 1970 it was 5.8/4.5/4.8 (combined 15.1)

It's not even close

 

 

You understand that I was only talking about defense, right?   And specifically, the defense when Anderson, Finley and Devereaux were on the field simultaneously.  That was the overall best outfield defensive alignment the O’s have ever had IMO, though Blair was a better defender than any of them.  But like I said, they weren’t on the field simultaneously all that often.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Frobby said:

You understand that I was only talking about defense, right?   And specifically, the defense when Anderson, Finley and Devereaux were on the field simultaneously.  That was the overall best outfield defensive alignment the O’s have ever had IMO, though Blair was a better defender than any of them.  But like I said, they weren’t on the field simultaneously all that often.  

Ya I do... I should have done a double quote for the other poster. My apologies. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

Ya I do... I should have done a double quote for the other poster. My apologies. 

@Frobby always treats us with respect when he responds and your apologies are well taken by this octogenarian.  😇

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Frobby said:

You understand that I was only talking about defense, right?   And specifically, the defense when Anderson, Finley and Devereaux were on the field simultaneously.  That was the overall best outfield defensive alignment the O’s have ever had IMO, though Blair was a better defender than any of them.  But like I said, they weren’t on the field simultaneously all that often.  

Yeah i remember those guys on Sportscenter top 10 seemingly 2 or 3 times a week making another stupid ass catch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

Wouldn't want to be in a poker game with Mike Elias.

Adley and Jackson give him Ace-Jack in the hole ~6-8 consecutive hands, and so far we've got fold-check-check.     Some loss of equity may have occurred the last 2 seasons.    

Granted that 3rd hand is just the deal.    I am still hopeful they are strong tight players, but we'll see if any sheep to shark actions occur this year.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Adley and Jackson give him Ace-Jack in the hole ~6-8 consecutive hands, and so far we've got fold-check-check.     Some loss of equity may have occurred the last 2 seasons.    

Granted that 3rd hand is just the deal.    I am still hopeful they are strong tight players, but we'll see if any sheep to shark actions occur this year.     

If you never deviate from playing tight you tend to end up losing slowly instead of winning.

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/4/2024 at 11:17 PM, Frobby said:

You understand that I was only talking about defense, right?   And specifically, the defense when Anderson, Finley and Devereaux were on the field simultaneously.  That was the overall best outfield defensive alignment the O’s have ever had IMO, though Blair was a better defender than any of them.  But like I said, they weren’t on the field simultaneously all that often.  

Agreed.  Hands down the best defensive OF I've seen in Baltimore (I'm 58).  It was a treat to witness, though, as you said, not all that often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Lol!  Correct, dude! I'm not against anything.  I just feel like maybe the expectations are a little higher than they need to be.  We don't need a number one SP - I mean, it would be great, but the value/cost at this moment would be bad, imo.  So I think there's the chance he's shopping at Ollie's.  Nothing wrong with that to me.  I'm just wondering if there are targets out there that someone is familiar with that would cost little instead of the guys being talked about - top prospects, Kjerstadt, etc. Other than Buddy Groom, LOL, there are no answers.  Fuji was almost equivalent to what I'm talking about here.  I just don't know who as I don't watch games around the league as I know many others here do.
    • Mayo.  His 2024 numbers are incredible, so you’re selling high as far as prospects go.  But his defense is a question mark and as this year shows, he has the least clear path to the majors of the group. Some of that is because of his age relative JH and SB, but it’s clear that JH and SB have clear rolls on this team once they are ready.  Mayo’s path is less clear. 
    • I'm coming around to this idea more and these are all good points, but I still wouldn't give up a whole lot for him.  His season so far this year is giving me a bit of Austin Voth 2022 vibes.  83 IP for us with a 3.04 ERA, 3.96 FIP, 8.3 H/9, 1.1 HR/9, 2.7 BB/9, 7.8 K/9...then he went back to being the Austin Voth he always was.  Maybe it's that they both pitched for the Nationals for a bit at the beginning of their careers, but both careers prior to their "breakout" 2022 and 2024 seasons, respectively, along with their numbers in their "breakout" seasons are eerily similar. I'm not dismissing the idea that he has figured something out, I'm just not willing to risk much betting that he has. 
    • I'm expecting the All-Star game soon. I would have said as quickly as possible after the sale but now I think they will wait until the renovations are complete.
    • I don't like the idea of parting with significant prospects for marginal players. For comparison's sake, we traded for Flaherty last year and gave up basically nothing. Flaherty (even mid season last year) is about as good as some of the guys we are thinking of trading real prospects for. Even if you get an additional year(s) of control, guys like Efflin I'm not trading someone like Norby for. I think we can do better if we are going to jet out the Norbys and Beavers of the world.
    • Maybe we can have an all star game and winter classic in the near future too!
    • I would consider Fedde the main aisle along with relievers like Scott and Estevez.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...