Jump to content

Kyle Bradish Has Sprained UCL, Will Start Season On IL (4/9 Update: Assigned rehab assignment w/Aberdeen)


DrinkinWithFermi

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Elias has known about the Bradish injury.  Look at our recent moves,

- Negotiate to get a team option for O'Hearn.

- Make waiver claim trade for IFs Nevin, Maton, and Soto.

Looks to me like Elias sought IF depth, and DH options.  The two positions where Kjerstad, and Norby, would provide depth at for this year.  

Or he's just settling his remaining arbitration case and filling out his 40-man roster where it was potentially thin (RH 1B, LH INF, RH OF).

It's just not much more complicated than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Team - "Gunnar nursing syrained oblique, expected to miss 2-3 weeks". Brandon Hyde said he is not concerned at all about Henderson's health.

You - "Gunnar will miss Opening Day, six weeks from today".

Thats right.  The O’s have a history of being transparent with their Injuries 👍.  With an oblique injury I wouldn’t expect him to be at 100% and ready to plan full time by opening day.  I’d like to be wrong.  But with an oblique you can’t do anything.  You have an arm injury, you can train your lower half. Oblique/core injuries effects everything.  You have to shut down until it is 100% healed, then start from scratch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RVAOsFan said:

I think this is a bit of an over reaction.  Is there a chance this happens? Yes.  However, the GM stated this morning he expects him back this season.  I think we can wait and see how the throwing program goes over the next couple weeks before we call the season a wrap. 

In this case I don't think he's overreacting. A sprained UCL is about a big of red flag as you can off for a pitcher and odds are overwhelming that this will lead to surgery. It usually does. As for Elias quote, I wouldn't read too much into his optimism. It's nothing more than a GM trying to put a somewhat positive spin on the situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

In this case I don't think he's overreacting. A sprained UCL is about a big of red flag as you can off for a pitcher and odds are overwhelming that this will lead to surgery. It usually does. As for Elias quote, I wouldn't read too much into his optimism. It's nothing more than a GM trying to put a somewhat positive spin on the situation. 

What's the incentive to put a positive spin on it? He's savvy enough to know it'd be better to lower/manage expectations now if the odds of the treatment weren't reasonably high IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, RVAOsFan said:

This whole situation sucks, probably the best rotation in my lifetime is destroyed before the first spring training game.

What I don't understand is the combination of Elias knowing about this injury and the Burnes trade.  Why would we trade prospects for a pitcher with one year of control if we knew we were going to be without Bradish in addition to Bautista.  Wouldn't a trade for a controllable Marlins pitcher make a lot more sense?

Maybe he actually believes Bradish will be back this year? I know some people on here absolutely refuse to take anything Elias says at face value, but it is conceivable that he's not flat out lying...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think my least favorite part about this is it puts so much pressure on Grayson Rodriguez as a defacto #2 to Corbin freakin' Burnes on a team trying to get to the World Series. 

And then what are you getting out of Dean Kremer night to night? 

And you're backing all this up with a bullpen that is without Wells? With an aging closer who may or may not be effective?

Man... I dunno. These are some serious pitching holes. I have to believe Elias is going to try and land a starter and a reliever somehow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ThisIsBirdland said:

What's the incentive to put a positive spin on it? He's savvy enough to know it'd be better to lower/manage expectations now if the odds of the treatment weren't reasonably high IMO. 

When has Elias ever been straight / completely honest with the press? 99% of his pressers are a bunch of words strung together with no substance. That's all this was. 

Non-surgical treatment rarely works for a sprained/torn UCL. It's not a question of if he's going to need surgery it's a question of when. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

Ok, so you and Corn have both named the same guy haha. We have a data set of... one guy. 

I acknowledge that it's possible, of course. But a tear is a tear and it's permanent damage. 

I'd say the odds of Bradish avoiding surgery are slightly better than one of us winning the lottery. It sucks, but that's just the reality of the situation and I'm sure Elias is operating under that assumption. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

Ok, so you and Corn have both named the same guy haha. We have a data set of... one guy. 

I acknowledge that it's possible, of course. But a tear is a tear and it's permanent damage. 

Thank you, Dr. Loper.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Let’s be clear. He’s pitching like an ace THIS YEAR. this is his first year in mlb and he was considered a back end starter when he was signed.  No one rational would say a 2.5 month performance in your first year in MLB requires the number one prospect in baseball PLUS MORE! Respectfully it’s lunacy.
    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
    • They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now.
    • Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. 
    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...