Jump to content

2024 Ongoing Lineup Thread


spleen1015

Recommended Posts

It's the subtle things that I like about Hyde. Santander plays his ass off defensively yesterday, diving catch, couple of hard running plays. He's DHing today. That's no accident. These little things help guys stay healthy, like it or not. 

And two good defensive replacement options for O'Hearn late in the game if you want to bring in Hays or Mateo. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dystopia said:

I expect they’ll get this game in, but it will be nasty and there will be a lengthy delay. 

Is that what Sportsguy’s weather man is saying?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Giving each of Hays, Santander, O'Hearn, and Mountcastle off one day every 5 games is exactly how you are able to get Cowser decent PAs. the fact that SIGBOT's computer doesn't understand that is a bit mind boggling, but I guess understanding that young players need to play to stay sharp is probably hard to account for.

You really need to stop saying this and listen to Eve Rosenbaum’s explanation of how the lineups are set.  Hyde makes the final decisions and there’s ample discussion and consideration of who needs rest and who needs playing time to stay sharp.   Just go to the 4:45 mark of this and there’s a very clear 3 minute explanation of the process.  


 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

You really need to stop saying this and listen to Eve Rosenbaum’s explanation of how the lineups are set.  Hyde makes the final decisions and there’s ample discussion and consideration of who needs rest and who needs playing time to stay sharp.   Just go to the 4:45 mark of this and there’s a very clear 3 minute explanation of the process.  


 

Stop trying to ruin the 'Sigbot sets the lineup not Hyde' narrative that's prevalent around here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...