Jump to content

John Means 2024


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

If Means comes back this year and ends up throwing 100+ innings and performs well, why would he sign that contract?  And please spare me the concept of “he likes it here”

He may not have many more chances at signing a contract, so he’s going to maximize that if he can.

It's a negotiation depending on how Means does.   The point is that if he has value to the O's they could extend him rather then letting him walk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

You are projecting the rest of the season before it happens.   Means may not pitch again this year or he could make up to 18 more starts plus the playoffs.     IMO its too early to say the O's would not extend him during the season.

If he doesn't pitch or barely pitches the rest of the season, why would the O's try to extend him? And if he does come back soon and pitches great, why would he extend for 3M plus incentives with team options?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChosenOne21 said:

If he doesn't pitch or barely pitches the rest of the season, why would the O's try to extend him? And if he does come back soon and pitches great, why would he extend for 3M plus incentives with team options?

Just answered that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Just answered that.

Do we have different definitions of extend? To me, an extension is when you sign a player currently under your control to a longer contract. I don't want to do that with Means for any value he'd likely accept.

Now, if at some point during the offseason we fail to land some top-target SPs and we still have a rotational hole, I'd consider bringing Means back on an incentive-laden deal. But we're not a rebuilding club anymore. We shouldn't be looking at gambles like Means's health as plan A. To me, an extension says, "You're plan A."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, wildcard said:

You are projecting the rest of the season before it happens.   Means may not pitch again this year or he could make up to 18 more starts plus the playoffs.     IMO its too early to say the O's would not extend him during the season.

Like I said, I don’t care.  He’s never once pitched an entire season and stayed healthy.   That’s not someone I’d sign for more than a year.  And I wouldn’t even do that until after he’s gotten through the rest of this season and at least stayed healthy for a reasonable chunk of the season. The most important ability is availability.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@wildcard what are the benefits of extending Means beyond this season vs signing an FA pitcher who has proven more reliable/less injury prone? Is it for the purpose of trying to save money? Do you believe in trying to remain as homegrown as possible at all costs/regardless of risk? Is it something else?

I'm curious to understand your perspective because you seem to highly value almost all players who wear an Oriole jersey (our minor league players too) to the point that you seem to almost object moving on/allowing them to leave/trading any for players outside of the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bemorewins said:

@wildcard what are the benefits of extending Means beyond this season vs signing an FA pitcher who has proven more reliable/less injury prone? Is it for the purpose of trying to save money? Do you believe in trying to remain as homegrown as possible at all costs/regardless of risk? Is it something else?

I'm curious to understand your perspective because you seem to highly value almost all players who wear an Oriole jersey (our minor league players too) to the point that you seem to almost object moving on/allowing them to leave/trading any for players outside of the organization.

The O's can release Ort this afternoon.    Not every player should stay.

I think there is a good chance the Santander, Hays and Mullins go next off season.

Urias and McCann will be on the bubble.  Could go if there are good replacements.

Is that enough change for you?

Means is a solid, effective pitcher when healthy.  He has been through a long rehab.   Hopefully he is close to coming out on the other side of that period.   He is not likely to be very expensive like Burnes.    IMO he fits with the O's if he can show he can pitch effective in the last two thirds of this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Do we have different definitions of extend? To me, an extension is when you sign a player currently under your control to a longer contract. I don't want to do that with Means for any value he'd likely accept.

Now, if at some point during the offseason we fail to land some top-target SPs and we still have a rotational hole, I'd consider bringing Means back on an incentive-laden deal. But we're not a rebuilding club anymore. We shouldn't be looking at gambles like Means's health as plan A. To me, an extension says, "You're plan A."

We do have different definitions of extension.   Means will be a FA after the season.  An extension is any contract the keeps him an Oriole instead of becoming a FA IMO.  One year or more.     Heck the O's may have extended Coulombe when they gave him an option year for 2025.  Its an extension if they pick up the option.

If Means goes FA then he signs with the O's that is not an extension.   That is signing a new contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, blid said:

What are you talking about? John Means has always had good results when he's on the mound.  He's a good pitcher. And people thought Mullins was better than he was not because the team was bad, but because he had a standout, elite season where he clubbed 30 home runs and got on base at a .360 clip, production he has not come close to replicating since.

John means is 23-26 in his career. Cedric is a career .253 hitter. They are average maybe even below average players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only using W-L as a metric for Means is a bit silly, especially when you're arguing we only think he's good because he was a standout on a bad team.  That's why his W-L record is mediocre!  But he's good when he's healthy.

And as for Mullins, yeah, he's not that great, I'm not saying otherwise.  I'm saying, though, that his 2021 was truly great, and that's why people got the idea he was better than he's ended up being.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TopGunnar said:

John means is 23-26 in his career. Cedric is a career .253 hitter. They are average maybe even below average players. 

Means has been worth 10.3 rWAR over 401 career IP.  He put up a 4.4 in 2019, 1.0 in the Covid 2020 season and 3.6 in 2021, his seasons where he did not miss significant time due to injury.  Mullins has not been good since last July for sure, but from 2021-2023 he put up 12.7 rWAR averaging about 4.2 per season.

 

So, I'm not sure you know what the word "average" means.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TopGunnar said:

John means is 23-26 in his career. Cedric is a career .253 hitter. They are average maybe even below average players. 

Cedric Mullins has had an above average career and is currently an above replacement level player despite his slump. Stating that he is an average or below average player is not factually accurate. He has been worth 12.8 rWAR in his career to this point, which puts him just outside the top 50 on the Orioles career WAR leader. Dauer and Nieman are tied at 49th with 14.4 WAR (as Orioles).

Mullins might not be a superstar but he has been an above average player or good player during his Orioles career. I think anyone saying something to the contrary is allowing the current slump to cloud the view of what has been a good career to this point.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TopGunnar said:

John means is 23-26 in his career. Cedric is a career .253 hitter. They are average maybe even below average players. 

He's a career 123 ERA+ pitcher with a 1.05 WHIP...he may not have a lengthy track record, but the numbers are certainly not "average, or slightly below".

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don’t know who “Lu Bob” is. I think his name is Luis Robert. But that sounds like a great package. What do you think the cost would be? Also, what would be the plan to improve the back end of the bullpen? We saw from Friday night a preview of what will probably happen if we get into a bullpen battle with a team with a very good pen in October.
    • Just what do you see the backlash being on Elias if the Orioles win over 100 games in lose in the first round?
    • Once the series is over, winning the last two is the most satisfying.  But while the series is ongoing, it’s the least comfortable.  So it depends which you prefer.   
    • He came up big in a big game.  And the offense came up big for him.  
    • I want to say, I thought the single he pulled on a good FB in on his hands was as impressive as the long homer he hit on a center cut FB.  Getting to those pitches in on the hands is tough.   Like I said though, I’d like to see more progress on change-ups and breaking stuff.    
    • I can appreciate where you are coming from. But the playoffs are more than luck. It’s about top talent performing against other teams top end talent. The Astros didn’t do all that winning because of luck (cheating aside lol). The Yankees teams of the mid to late 90’s were more than lucky.  We have the kind of talent (both on the field and in the front office) and we took the extreme tanking step in order to amass dynasty/multi-championship level run. Just simply making the playoffs and getting eliminated early, while you continue to be cheap and overly cautious (if that is what was to happen) will get old after awhile. There is a reason that the Rays and Guardians don’t have a significant fanbase/marketplace engagement for a reason (beyond being a small market). STL is a small market and the Padres were until recently, when their ownership changed and decided to spend to engage the marketplace and grow fan interest.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...