-
Who's Online 49 Members, 0 Anonymous, 166 Guests (See full list)
- The Goob
- Safelykept
- tom_o'malley
- orioles22
- spleen1015
- Natty
- Looch
- BirdinBama
- Greg Pappas
- Allan Bryant
- Dunk35
- Malike
- Jammer7
- glenn__davis
- frankwhite
- Filmstudy
- Roll Tide
- Satyr3206
- Sports Guy
- cravens86
- ChosenOne21
- vab
- Ven6
- Frobby
- Royle
- jubbyjubb
- shakester23
- Don_Aase_Fan
- bpilktree
- andymax
- Brian88
- Philip
- Chaka Garcia
- DirtyBird
- George Zuverink
- 86this
- Orange
- NedFromYork
- OsFanSinceThe80s
- luismatos4prez
- O's84
- FlaO'sFan
- clapdiddy
- drjohnnyfever1
- mall-O-cup
- dystopia
- DenPA2002
- Gatoriole
- e16bball
-
Posts
-
By ShoelesJoe · Posted
Please tell me we'd have no interest in him, even at the MLB minimum. -
-
-
Luke Dickerson is a late riser as well, HS infielder. Honeycutt’s profile reminds me a lot of Bradfield and Horvath from 2023. He probably won’t be there, but if so, I echo your thoughts. He is a very exciting player, potentially. Brecht is probably gone too. Not sure what his $ number is, or any of these guys for that matter. They could gamble on an arm there at 22, knowing they can get a HS hitter in the comp pick, 32 (I think?). I like to occasionally gamble on arms, if you like the stuff and the track record. In a way, it’s good that he is at Iowa and not a program that goes deep in the tournament and such. As I understand it, Brecht converted from a football wide receiver twos year or so ago, so as you said, he’s an athlete. Not sure of the mileage on the arm. With the stuff and athleticism, reliever risk is not a problem for me. I have come around on him a bit after you kept pounding the keyboard on him. -
I say again, we should play Stowers every day, against all pitchers. Lets see if he can hit. Now is the time. But it will cost Mullins and Hays some playing time. I think we already know what they can do. -
By Greg Pappas · Posted
I took the poll as being posited as: If you knew in advance that the outcome would be two wins and one loss, in which order would you prefer that to occur? @Frobby can correct me if I'm off on that. -
Odd question, but psychologically, it is better to lose the first and then come back and win the second two, because literally you’re starting at the bottom and improve. Winning the first two sets you up for tremendous disappointment when you lose the third. Just think about the Atlanta series and how everybody was so disappointed to lose the third game, but if we’d lost the first game and won, the second two people would be much less disappointed. That ridiculous Toronto Series: if we had lost the first two and then won the second two people would be happier than us losing the second two, even though the outcome was the same.
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
-
Popular Now
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.