Jump to content

Colton Cowser 2024


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I don't think anyone would dislike with those numbers, but I'd argue if he puts up those numbers, he's going to get more than 402 PAs this year. Probably close to 500 PAs. So what does his numbers project to at 500 PAs?

I'd be happy to reproject this every 2 weeks, but one assumption I'm making is that there is some regression to his platoon history.  For that reason, I don't think it's nearly as simple as 500/402 times the numbers I posted because his marginal PAs would be disproportionately vs LHP which would be very likely to hurt his rate stats. 

Also need to project for some injury risk if we're talking O/U numbers.  If you were projecting OBJ's receiving yards last year that was a central assumption, but even a young ballplayer needs that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s an example of why it isn’t the worst thing in the world if a player is sent down to work on things. Cowser. Bradish. Stowers and Kjerstad now. 

Cowser worked his butt off this offseason it looks like. Kudos to him and the coaching staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Filmstudy said:

I'd be happy to reproject this every 2 weeks, but one assumption I'm making is that there is some regression to his platoon history.  For that reason, I don't think it's nearly as simple as 500/402 times the numbers I posted because his marginal PAs would be disproportionately vs LHP which would be very likely to hurt his rate stats. 

Also need to project for some injury risk if we're talking O/U numbers.  If you were projecting OBJ's receiving yards last year that was a central assumption, but even a young ballplayer needs that.

I think all that’s fair.  I just think that if he really posts an .862 OPS, he’s highly likely to get more than 402 PA.  Gunnar had 445 PA just in games started by RHP last year, plus 177 in games started by lefties, and his platoon splits were pretty big.  I think if Cowser only ends up at 402 PA, it’ll be because he’s not hitting way better than the other OFs - below .800 OPS, for sure.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Right now its the easiest a ride the hot hand call gets.    I figure as long as a Games On Base streak is going, he's in, though Cole Ragans lineup this weekend will be a challenge if he's everyday until then.

It would be hard for him to do any worse against Ragans than the lineup did in the first matchup.

He might at least drive up the pitch count a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think all that’s fair.  I just think that if he really posts an .862 OPS, he’s highly likely to get more than 402 PA.  Gunnar had 445 PA just in games started by RHP last year, plus 177 in games started by lefties, and his platoon splits were pretty big.  I think if Cowser only ends up at 402 PA, it’ll be because he’s not hitting way better than the other OFs - below .800 OPS, for sure.  

You're probably right that he'd get more PAs and Hyde would eschew any strict platooning, even if splits are big and that would negatively impact my projection.  Incredibly, .800 OPS for the rest of the season (at the same rate of play he's had to date) would bring him in very close to .862 for the season.

One big thing that has changed since the days of Lowenstein/Roenicke is the number of roster spots for hitters and pitchers.  In 1980, that was approximately 15 position players and 10 pitchers.  Now it's 13 and 13.  The change makes straight platooning far more difficult.

As a point of reference, John Lowenstein in 1982 had only 382 PAs despite being the most productive hitter in baseball on a per AB or PA basis with a 1.071 OPS and 194 OPS+.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Looking forward to seeing how he approaches his at bats tomorrow night.

This is what he did at Norfolk.  He did seem a little more passive tonight.   Swing and swing early.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • We do not have to give up Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo to get what we need.
    • So you think Elias will give up one of the top 3 prospects to get upgrades?
    • “Dramatics”? That’s an interesting way of framing my opinion. I promise you I am as calm and cool as a cucumber. There’s no “dramatics” going on here. As you know, numbers fluctuate during any given period of time in the season. Good/great players have bad/cold stretches and bad/terrible players have good stretches. IMO we do not possess the type of top end talent at the back end of the bullpen needed to win multiple rounds against the best opposition in October.  If you are confident in Cano/Kimbrel or worse in Vespi/Baker/Perez/etc getting Soto and Judge out in a big spot late in the game in Yankee stadium in October, that is fine. I am not.  Just as an observer of baseball, Holmes is a much better pitcher than any reliever that we have. I would be much more confident in his talent than any reliever that we have. Now if we had Felix that would be one thing. But this season we do not. And I would hate for a team as good as ours to be held back by not making the needed/necessary move(s) before we get into October.  IMO we did that last season (with the starting pitching) and it didn’t end well. And I acknowledge that everybody doesn’t think like me nor have the same championship expectations/aspirations. Some fans/posters here have stated as much and that they are happy if we have a winning team year after year or if we just make it into the tournament year after year, regardless of results when we get there. And that’s fine. That’s just not my desired outcome. The great thing about this board is that we don’t have to agree and are able to express our opinions.
    • That’s right. Great times are here and more ahead with this group. 
    • Over/under on the number of times we walk Judge and Soto in this series?   10?  Nobody else really worries me.  
    • 2 days in a row we got some help from the RedSox
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...