Jump to content

One-run games


Uli2001

Recommended Posts

For one thing, they don’t have Bautista shutting things down in the 9th inning or extra innings.  

Second, 30-16 just doesn’t happen every year.  I’m actually pretty encouraged that the O’s have played .650 baseball without winning a disproportionate number of close games.  
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

Yeah, the pen is shaky and offense is really down in general. Look at what Hays, Mullins and Santander are doing this year compared to last year. Thankfully, the young guys are doing their best to pick up the slack. 

Santander really shouldn’t be lumped in with Hays and Mullins IMO.   He’s mildly below expectations, and has had hot and cold spells.  Hays and Mullins are WAY below their norms.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Santander really shouldn’t be lumped in with Hays and Mullins IMO.   He’s mildly below expectations, and has had hot and cold spells.  Hays and Mullins are WAY below their norms.   

I agree, but in general, our entire starting OF from last year has be underperforming this season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winning one-run games isn't a repeatable skill from season to season, even if you have an outstanding closer.  We're just regressing to the mean. There's a good chance that we'll wind up this season being a better team but with fewer wins than last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/19/2024 at 10:41 AM, Frobby said:

For one thing, they don’t have Bautista shutting things down in the 9th inning or extra innings. 
 

Yes, I think that is the biggest difference. If Kimbrel doesn't blow those two saves against Oakland, the Orioles would be 8-4 in one-run innings, which is the same pace as last year.

You can't overstate the importance of a shutdown bullpen in today's game. The Royals won a world series in the past 10 years with a shutdown bullpen and average everything else. Starters these days are pitching less than six innings. I think you will see a lot of money move from elite starters to elite relievers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
On 5/19/2024 at 4:10 AM, Uli2001 said:

The Orioles were 30-16 in one-run games in 2023.

They are 6-6 this year so far.

Orioles magic hasn’t been there this year, at least so far.

What changed?

Random variation.

The 2012 Orioles were 29-9 in one-run games. They returned most of the players, managers, and coaching staff and in 2013 were 20-31.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
    • They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now.
    • Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. 
    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
    • Way to avoid the question.  If the O's were in rebuild mode and had Gray Rod in the exact position he is now, what kind of prospect package would you want?  Fans here are notorious for not wanting to give up any good prospects for other team's best players but then want the world for their own less than perfect players.  When Gausman was about to be traded here (way less an impressive pitcher than Gray Rod is now), posters here were convinced that the O's would get 3 top 100 prospects for him.  The O's got none 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...