Jump to content

The 2024 Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

I was thinking more Efflin and bullpen help. Bradley would be interesting too but would cost a lot.

Adams & Armstrong are the 2 Tampa guys to target. Mid 30s relievers shouldn’t cost a ton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we really need to trade for CF just because we have so much depth at COF. We could promote Mayo or Kjerstad permanently and just see how they shake out, which wouldn't offensively be as bad as Mullins has been this year. Slide over Cowser to CF if we can't find that good a deal, and then go for anothter SP arm and some more depth in the pen. They don't trade Basallo because (and this is just me speculating) that they could move on from either Mountcastle or O'Hearn in the 2025-2026 offseason depending on if they can get a good return on them, like what we saw Tampa do with Austin Meadows a couple years back and the Orioles have a backup to replace said bat or bats. 

In terms of who we go for, I don't really know. I don't like the idea of reuniting with Tanner Scott because his control issues and walk rate are still very present. I'm not in love with the idea of going for Kopech because the numbers and peripherals are average at best.  Carlos Estavez from the Angels, sure but how high is that asking price going to be? Whoever sells come deadline time could be interesting, as teams like the Cubs and Tigers could potentially be sellers come deadline time. Maybe even the mighty Astros who haven't been as good this year could be persuaded to sell off some talent depending on who we make available. It's a little to early to tell as of right now due to a good chunk of the sport sitting at around 500, but who knows at this point? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Ellis said recently that Tampa was not going to trade Glasnow inside the division  last winter.    I don't know that would change for their current  players.

 A player who is a FA after this year TB is not going to care where he goes. That said they only have Armstrong and Rosario. Potentially Maton. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

I really think they have their eyes on Basallo as not only an huge impact player for the team, but also as the face of the new Latin program for many years moving forward.  As in using him as a recruitment tool, a shining example of what signing with the Os can mean, etc. Latin America was an early stated goal and I think ME sees it as the absolute key to longer term success. And I think he sees Basallo as the face of that end of the operation for the next 15 years or more. 
 

Wouldn’t surprise me at all if Basallo was the first player meaningfully extended. 

This ……100000%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

There’s no way Elias is giving up Basallo for a player like Luis Robert, Garrett Crochet or Mason Miller. It would have to be a bigger name than those three players. 

What bigger name is available than those 3?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fiver6565 said:

I really think they have their eyes on Basallo as not only an huge impact player for the team, but also as the face of the new Latin program for many years moving forward.  As in using him as a recruitment tool, a shining example of what signing with the Os can mean, etc. Latin America was an early stated goal and I think ME sees it as the absolute key to longer term success. And I think he sees Basallo as the face of that end of the operation for the next 15 years or more. 
 

Wouldn’t surprise me at all if Basallo was the first player meaningfully extended. 

That would be very surprising to me and potentially very damaging to the brand and business. How often have you been the Camden Yards this season? Have you seen all of the #2 and #35 shirts in the stands?

To allow those two multi-Allstars and potentially more (who have actually done it on the field) to walk for the sake of promoting something that is symbolic would be a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

That would be very surprising to me and potentially very damaging to the brand and business. How often have you been the Camden Yards this season? Have you seen all of the #2 and #35 shirts in the stands?

To allow those two multi-Allstars and potentially more (who have actually done it on the field) to walk for the sake of promoting something that is symbolic would be a disaster.

Where did I suggest letting 2 and 35 walk?  I said first, not only. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fiver6565 said:

Where did I suggest letting 2 and 35 walk?  I said first, not only. 

I think the idea is that if Basallo is first it would mean it would already be too late to extend the other two.

What's the earliest you would extend Basallo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

What bigger name is available than those 3?

I’m not the one posting these rumors. I don’t see Elias trading Basallo because no player worth that price is getting traded before August 1st. 

It’s clickbait and it’s working since we’re discussing it on OH. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I’m not the one posting these rumors. I don’t see Elias trading Basallo because no player worth that price is getting traded before August 1st. 

It’s clickbait and it’s working since we’re discussing it on OH. 

1702772187540?e=2147483647&v=beta&t=2MGd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think the idea is that if Basallo is first it would mean it would already be too late to extend the other two.

What's the earliest you would extend Basallo?

It’s in the realm of possibility that he becomes the Os first example of an extension pre or right after call up. That theoretically could be as early as next year, or two years at most. That doesn’t close the door on the others. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

Where did I suggest letting 2 and 35 walk?  I said first, not only. 

Then I’m not sure what you are talking about.
 

This is #35’s third season and second all-star apparently. He has also won a silver slugger.

This is #2’s second season and he will be an all-star and possible MVP. Along with the fact that he has won a silver slugger. AND he has Boras for an agent.

So it seems to me that it’s probably about now or never for extending both. Rutschman will be in his FOURTH season next year. 

Basallo is in AA. How in the world do those timelines work to you? Where you extend Basallo first and then are able to come back and the do Henderson and Rutchsman (the much more accomplished players who have led you to the playoffs). I’m confused..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's low hanging fruit to laugh at the doom-and-gloom crowd, the sky-is-falling Chicken Littles, and the run-for-the-hills Billies.  So, fruit duly plucked. 🤣 However, there is some truth within their pessimistic outlook.  It's absolutely fair to be concerned about our pitching.  Who's to say who is right or wrong in how much concern there should be?  Well, we all have a say.  It's why we're here.  The beloved @Roy Firestone is admittedly the most pessimistic Game Thread poster in history, yet no one questions his love of the O's.  Nor should we berate those with strongly pessimistic views about our chances as being less of a fan.   It's just my two cents, but I think it's readily apparent that we need to add to our pitching and I believe Elias will address it.  A quality starter and a reliever or two would likely do wonders for the team... and our collective sanity.   I just don't feel we'd need to deal Holliday, or Mayo, or Basallo to get there.  Then again, I may be wrong.  
    • Who are the Os top three? Burnes, GRod, and…….?
    • There never is going to be an “all in” year.   Elias made the mostly in move by getting Burnes and then the baseball gods decided to cut down Bradish, Means, and Wells.  Coulombe too.  The Dodgers are “all in” every single year.  1 WS trophy in a shortened season. Elias is going to make some moves but he’s not dipping into the top 3 prospects and maybe not even Kjerstad.   You can’t make a habit of trading guys with 6+ years of control for players with minimal amounts of control.  Yeah, this was the Burnes year and we got some bad luck.  Maybe we can still piece it together but Elias is only going to do that up to a point. As far as next year, who knows.  
    • I don't disagree at all.  I just put a much stronger emphasis on the top two guys in a series instead of three.  In most five game series your third starter will only pitch once.  Win the division and Kremer may make only 4 postseason starts even as our #3 all the way through the World Series.  That's why I would be focused on bullpen arms instead of a starter.  I love the idea of a starter with years of control to help offset the loss of Burnes to FA but I just don't see anyone that attractive that will be available.  This team's path through the AL is to have Burnes and Rodriguez be aces and the lineup to continue to be the best in the league regardless of who the third or fourth starters are.  
    • Your comment basically confirms what I said. You admit that Suarez and Irwin would regress, which they have. As a result of that regression, they are no longer reliable members of a powerful rotation. Therefore, we will slowly sink unless Mike gets someone better, and not just one, either. How is it an irrational fear to say we will slowly sink if we don’t make acquisitions? You just agreed that Suarez and Irwin aren’t adequate, so the concern is completely valid. Add to that Kremer’s spotty performance and injury concerns, and Povich remaining a huge question mark. Outside our top two, we got nobody dependable. And that’s just discussing the starters. your comment is curious because you try to refute what I was saying but instead confirm it, and you close by admitting they “have to improve on obvious needs”  We can debate what would constitute “going overboard,” but it’s clear from his past transactions that Mike cares a lot about the price he pays for an asset, so I think, far from overpaying, he’s more likely to duplicate what he did last season.
    • More should have been done to improve the team's rotation and Bullpen in the offseason.  Since John Angelos controlled the purse strings, additional spending was just not happening.  I put that on Angelos not Elias.  Does anyone think that Elias would not have liked say $30 million to add to 2024 payroll to strengthen the pitching?  This trade deadline is a time for Rubinstein to prove himself as much as Elias.
    • The Moose hits it!!!! Anyone who sets up their expectations to world series or bust needs good strong blood pressure meds. The year we win it will probably be a year we didn't expect. I'm enjoying the O's are relavent again after way to many years in the wilderness. Get to the dance and take your chances. That's my moto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...