Jump to content

Extend Burnes


Big Al

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I love Burnes but wouldn't want to pay what it takes. We still have Ortiz/Hall level prospects we can trade for the next Burnes. Remember we get a comp pick when he walks.

Do we?

The only guys in Ortiz' range are Kjerstad and Basallo.

Are we open to trading them?  For rentals?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Do we?

The only guys in Ortiz' range are Kjerstad and Basallo.

Are we open to trading them?  For rentals?

I would be open to trading a Basallo or Mayo for a TOR guy with multiple years of control. Kjerstad and Norby both have top 100 resumes. Stowers could have some value. Bradfield and Beavers aren't top 100 yet but could be knocking on the door. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I would be open to trading a Basallo or Mayo for a TOR guy with multiple years of control. Kjerstad and Norby both have top 100 resumes. Stowers could have some value. Bradfield and Beavers aren't top 100 yet but could be knocking on the door. 

Norby, Stowers, Bradfield, and Beavers are not on Ortiz' level.

Basallo, Mayo, and Kjerstad are.  Higher in fact.

However, Ortiz got one year of a top rotation guy with a "throw in" that was likewise a top 100 guy.

It's possible you could get a TOR guy- not on Burnes' level- for a package built around one of those three.  But there's hardly a guarantee and most posters have been adamant about not parting with Basallo or Mayo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, those insane numbers are the price of top talent starting pitching. While we're certainly capable of it, I don't completely trust nor want to completely rely on our ability to develop top talent starting pitching. Maybe Burnes isn't the guy, but at some point if we want to win the World Series or even keep winning we're going to have to take a huge gamble on a guy like him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pickles said:

Norby, Stowers, Bradfield, and Beavers are not on Ortiz' level.

Basallo, Mayo, and Kjerstad are.  Higher in fact.

However, Ortiz got one year of a top rotation guy with a "throw in" that was likewise a top 100 guy.

It's possible you could get a TOR guy- not on Burnes' level- for a package built around one of those three.  But there's hardly a guarantee and most posters have been adamant about not parting with Basallo or Mayo.

Agreed. The question is what Bradfield/Beavers might get us 9-10 months from now, as they progress and other guys graduate. I think Ortiz was actually the second piece in the Burnes deal... But regardless both Hall and Ortiz were both in the bottom half of the top 100, a level below Mayo/Basallo. I'm just not going to hold my breath on a Burnes/Cole type signing. Even with our new owners there is always going to be teams who can outbid us. The guy I'd really covet is Roki Sasaki but appears the Dodgers have the inside track.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

So what team will spend the money? Dodgers? Yankees? Rangers?   If it is not a good idea from a baseball standpoint , why would other teams do it? 

The other teams are all dumb.  That's also why they draft pitchers in the first place.

Ever team should only draft hitters and then trade for pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The other teams are all dumb.  That's also why they draft pitchers in the first place.

Ever team should only draft hitters and then trade for pitchers.

Unless you basically have infinite resources to spend to fill any hole. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there's anyone in next season's free agent class at Burnes' level who doesn't either have an injury history (Bieber, Buehler, Cole, Fried) or who is old (Morton, Scherzer, Verlander), or who is in some kind of opt out or option status (Cole, Merrill Kelly, Jordan Montgomery, Robbie Ray, Snell, Peralta).

Outside of those guys it's mostly the usual tier below like Alex Cobb, Kyle Hendricks, Paxton, Flaherty, etc.

And I think all off these guys are 30+ or will be by next season. 

If you choose not to pursue Burnes because of his age and declining strike out rate -- combined with cost -- then I don't see how you can realistically pursue any other free agent starter at a similar level.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EddeeEddee said:

I don't think there's anyone in next season's free agent class at Burnes' level who doesn't either have an injury history (Bieber, Buehler, Cole, Fried) or who is old (Morton, Scherzer, Verlander), or who is in some kind of opt out or option status (Cole, Merrill Kelly, Jordan Montgomery, Robbie Ray, Snell, Peralta).

Outside of those guys it's mostly the usual tier below like Alex Cobb, Kyle Hendricks, Paxton, Flaherty, etc.

And I think all off these guys are 30+ or will be by next season. 

If you choose not to pursue Burnes because of his age and declining strike out rate -- combined with cost -- then I don't see how you can realistically pursue any other free agent starter at a similar level.

It takes very little work to talk yourself out of any free agent pitcher.

With no idea of where payroll is going to sit under new ownership it's hard to even speculate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It takes very little work to talk yourself out of any free agent pitcher.

With no idea of where payroll is going to sit under new ownership it's hard to even speculate.

I think the Ubaldo Jimenez contract is still the largest the O's have ever given out to a free agent starter.  

Personally, I think it makes more sense to spend big on an elite free agent starter than on elite position players.  

Of course they have to be cautious in how and who they identify as elite, but I think they should bid for Burnes, and not just a token bid -- a real bid.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Getting to hear Jason Benetti, Carlos Pena and Kirk Gibson some of the afternoon was a treat. It was new to me earlier this year Gibson is still broadcasting almost a decade after his Parkinson's diagnosis...good for him. Benetti dumping the White Sox for the Tigers gives me some Miller to San Francisco vibes...he is excellent. Baseball as entertainment - it is wonderful that Carlos Pena, literally the player pushed aside so Scott Hatteberg could play offense more efficiently, has become a strong SABR-oriented analyst.
    • I don't think the rookies get to pick what the wear.  I 100% am sure the vets are picking these outfits.  
    • I’d be shocked if the O’s do better than 2-4, and I’m half expecting them to go 1-5.
    • Worst female impersonator ever!
    • I watched the inning where the Tigers scored their 2 runs.  Our friend Meadows had two check swings that easily could have been called strikes, but instead he walked to load the bases.  Carpenter popped out but then Perez had an insane at-bat where he fouled off a ton of pitches, wasn't fooled by anything, and then delivered a bases loaded double which proved to be the difference. Our guys would likely have whiffed on just about every pitch in those at-bats, but their guys have a crazy amount of confidence right now and it has served them very well.   I do think they have a good chance of winning out and ending with 88 just based on who they play, which means we have to go 3-3 this week or we are out of the 4 spot.  Hopefully their luck will finally run out against us (assuming we can win enough to get in), but if it doesn't, I would love to see them knock out the Yankees.
    • If they played baseball another month maybe. Elias has been pretty much no comment on anything other than time is not on his. His last Lat issues had him control problems ( I Believe ) when he first came back. I'm just happy to have the others back.
    • 6 games left, they haven’t won more than one game in a series since the beginning of the month (against the White Sox for context). I see no reason to think they’ll do any better than 2-4 for remainder of the season.    Plus, i said it “feels” like. It’s an emotional response, not an analytical one. I’m going off the premise that they’ve been an absolute mess for quite a while and a playoff spot seems like a weird place to be for a team that’s played .400 ball since the All Star Break.  They could sweep the rest of the season, who knows? Just saying it feels bleak. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...