Jump to content

Should the Orioles keep Povich, Kremer and Rogers in the organization for 2025?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

The Orioles are very likely to lose Burnes and certainly need to add a starter this offseason.

The Orioles, whether fans want to acknowledge it or not, value Rogers and feel they can get something out of him.

They also clearly value Kremer, as he has 90 starts the last 4 seasons and has basically pitched to the level of a #3 starter the last 3 seasons combined.

Povich got 16 starts in 2024.  He ended the year very strong.

The question for me is, do you keep all of these guys. I know we also have McDermott but I think his injury last year buys time for him to start more in the minors.  And we are unclear about Suarez. So, let’s just keep this discussion to the 3 I mentioned.

Povich and Rogers can be in the minors and we can treat them as depth but do the Orioles do that? They clearly like Rogers and while Povich starting 16 was more out of necessity, he did show well at times.

We know Eflin and GRod are in the rotation, assuming health.

We know they need to add one guy but if you want to add 2, do you keep all of these guys or do you look to trade one of them?

There are a lot of ways I would be happy with the Os going this offseason w/r/t pitching and trading (likely) Povich or Kremer is something that could come into play. 
 

Would you rather look for upgrades on these guys and trade someone or just keep everyone because you need/want that depth?

And would you be ok just adding one starter and having either Povich or Rogers in the rotation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's an easy call to keep all 3 right now. 

Kremer is in the rotation somewhere, and both Povich and Rogers will have to fight for the 5th spot, or they will come up throughout the year. 

The Orioles don't have a lot of LH SP depth, so I think they will want to keep both Povich and Rogers.

That said, if the O's go out and sign 2 SP as rotation upgrades, Kremer is a good trade candidate. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep all 3. Kremer absolutely should be in the rotation. As things stand now, here is the rotation (to me):

  • SP1: Acquire one
  • SP2: Eflin
  • SP3: Grayson
  • SP4: Kremer
  • SP5: Acquire one *and* open competition with the depth (in order) being: Suarez, Povich, McDermott, Rogers

They can't go into next season taking chances. I was on record saying it was irresponsible to go into 2024 knowing Bradish was hurt, Means had a setback/massive injury history, Wells injury history, Suarez being an unknown and not acquiring a back of the rotation arm. And that meant your depth was Irvin (at the time) and...really nobody else that was reasonably ready. 

Can't do the same this year. Gotta get a #1, and I'd argue a BOR arm that is reliable if not spectacular and if/when somebody has a setback in spring/offseason, well at least you have some options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you've got to go into the year with 7 healthy starters.  If both Povich and Rogers still have options then it's ok to start them in the minors.  They will be needed at some point.

Eflin, Rodriguez, Kremer, new SP, then either Povich or Rogers.  I'd consider adding another whether that's Suarez or someone similar.  

Since adding the splitter Kremer has been very good.  I think he's become underrated.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m going to assume they don’t sign Snell, Burnes or Fried. Snell is my #1 target but i doubt it happens.

So, pick who you want from that next tier. I’ll go with Pivetta but am open to other names.

That said, in the scenario of only adding one guy, I would also make a push for Bieber. There is some talk he just goes back to Cleveland but if he doesn’t, the likely deal he’s looking at is a 1 year deal with an option or a 2 year deal fully guaranteed. 
 

He likely isn’t in the majors until June at the earliest but he could be a big help in the second half.

You pay him a cheaper salary and maybe throw some incentives on top of it and then next year he’s making 15-20M or something along those lines.

That is something I would be very interested in doing.

Just a matter of if he becomes available and if you want to guarantee the second year or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, StottyByNature said:

I think you've got to go into the year with 7 healthy starters.  If both Povich and Rogers still have options then it's ok to start them in the minors.  They will be needed at some point.

Eflin, Rodriguez, Kremer, new SP, then either Povich or Rogers.  I'd consider adding another whether that's Suarez or someone similar.  

Since adding the splitter Kremer has been very good.  I think he's become underrated.

Ks went up but walks also jumped.  If he can keep the Ks up and get the walks back down, he moves up a peg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on who's available and who's acquired.  As it stands, yeah, I'm in favor of keeping those three.  Kremer is the 3rd or 4th starter next year.  

I'd like to see them sign a starter in free agency.  I know it won't be Burnes or Snell but IMO the rotation is:  

FA/Eflin

Eflin/FA

G-Rod

Kremer

Open competition between Povich, Rogers, maybe Suarez if he comes back.  

Povich did seem to come around in the last month of the season.  I know he doesn't have the dominant fastball velocity that everyone wants to see but there's some things to like.  It's obvious there's something they like about Rogers, we'll see what they can coax out of him.

I'd be open to trading Kremer depending on what comes back.  I highly doubt that this happens though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m going to assume they don’t sign Snell, Burnes or Fried. Snell is my #1 target but i doubt it happens.

So, pick who you want from that next tier. I’ll go with Pivetta but am open to other names.

That said, in the scenario of only adding one guy, I would also make a push for Bieber. There is some talk he just goes back to Cleveland but if he doesn’t, the likely deal he’s looking at is a 1 year deal with an option or a 2 year deal fully guaranteed. 
 

He likely isn’t in the majors until June at the earliest but he could be a big help in the second half.

You pay him a cheaper salary and maybe throw some incentives on top of it and then next year he’s making 15-20M or something along those lines.

That is something I would be very interested in doing.

Just a matter of if he becomes available and if you want to guarantee the second year or not.

Dont think you get him cheap. If so probably back to Cleveland. How much would you offer Means? how high would you go for Saurez? Dont forget Wells and Bradish could be back next year. Would love to have him though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Safelykept said:

Dont think you get him cheap. If so probably back to Cleveland. How much would you offer Means? how high would you go for Saurez? Dont forget Wells and Bradish could be back next year. Would love to have him though.

Bradish isn’t pitching next year unless it’s relief late in the year.

Zero interest in bringing back the other 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Povich and Rogers both have two options remaining.  Kremer has one.  McDermott has two options as well.  As of right now we're at,

#1 Eflin

#2 Grayson

#3 Kremer (I'm putting Kremer above Suarez because Kremer was going to start Game 3 if need be.  So the org favors him over Suarez) - 1 option remaining

#4 Suarez - no options remaining

#5 Povich - 2 options remaining

#6 McDermott - 2 options remaining

IL Possible returns at some point - Bradish, Wells

I would prefer bringing Burnes back obviously.  Then adding a vet type as a AAA depth SP.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 1fingerwillie said:

Yes and this is why I think we get only one SP this offseason. Hopefully Burnes. 

And really this is what it comes down to.

Do you want to add 1 or 2 starters?  If you want to add 2, you can still keep everyone for depth but it perhaps allows you to deal an arm if you so choose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I'm not sure Kelly has a ton of value. His defensive metrics are declining. His ZIPs projections for 2025 is 301 PA, .226/.306/.365 for 8 HR and 13 2Bs. Why not just keep McCann? Tyler O'Neill I can get behind. That would be a solid pickup. I would hope they can do better than Pivetta. I agree with you that Snell makes much more sense if you want to win. With Jeff Hoffman, are you paying for the last two years in Philly? Because before that he was not good. With relievers being as volatile as they are, what's the contract look like. I'd be worried about paying for 2023-2024 level performance and getting the pitcher you saw in Cincinnati in 2021-2022.   So give me McCann, O'Neill and Snell. Do what the O's do and find a cheap and effective BP arm or two off the scrap heap.  I'd be good.
    • This wouldn’t be an Angelos offseason as it would be multiple multi year commitments where the players are making 8 figures. And yes, Elias isn’t a GM likely to go nuts in FA because he knows it’s largely foolish to do so.
    • That offseason would stink, to be quite honest. And Rubenstein should be rightfully criticized if that's all it was. The O's roster would be an 84-85 win club if that's all they did.  Jeff Hoffman would be a great pickup. Nick Pivetta is a middle/back of the rotation guy and would be a big step back from Burnes.  Carson Kelly is a backup C and a lateral move to McCann. Tyler O'Neill would be a fine replacement for Santander.  They need more. A Eflin, Grayson, Pivetta, Kremer, Povich/Suarez/Rogers/McDermott rotation just isn't good enough. That's also not enough depth. You simply can't count on Rogers and his 88-89 mph fastball, nor can you count on Suarez to repeat (although he'd be a fine bullpen/depth arm as a starter).  This bullpen, even adding Hoffman, is still a liability waiting to happen.  This club needs 2 bullpen arms, 2 starters, a backup C, and at least 1 OF/DH type as well as some sort of investment in the young core by way of contract extensions. I'm sick of hearing "well it takes 2 to tango". That's balderdash. If the Royals can do it, the O's can do it. 
    • Unless there are extensions this would not be a good offseason for new ownership. Just screams Angelos approach, IMO which means Elias is more than problem. Take risks for once 
    • The Marlins lost Alcantara, Perez for the entire season, Luzardo/Garrett/Cabrera had multiple injuries. It's easy to believe things are coincidental but when you look at what so many of their key players were going through and how others had to step up, it makes a lot more sense. Most of them are also young, too.   
    • I like this approach. So yes, I'd be satisfied. I am not  big splash or bust. This approach or similar makes a lot of sense to me. We have the potential. This supports and enhances that potential IMO. 
    • I'd be a bit disappointed.  I'd be fine with Kelly, Hoffman and O'Neil, I actually like those 3 moves, depending on length of contracts and the like.  But if Pivetta is our big SP add, I'd feel they didn't do enough.  I'm not against Pivetta being signed as a PART of the SP upgrades maybe, but don't want him to the the headliner.  If we don't end up with a Burnes/Snell/Fried I'm going to be a bit disappointed.   That said, there are a few other moves I'd like to see.  I'm more than ready to move on from the Mountcastle/O'Hearn platoon at 1st base, and would like to see us sign a full time first baseman like Walker.  Sure, in a perfect world we could put Mayo there, but from what we saw last year I'm not sold that he can do it.  I know it was a SSS, but still.   If that was our offseason, it makes us a better team, so that's a good thing.  But I'd be a bit unhappy and would feel like they didn't do quite enough to improve the team.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...