Jump to content

Who Are You .... and what have you done to Bill Rowell?


hoosiers

Recommended Posts

From today's BA's Chat :

Jarin McKay (Greenville, NC): Whats the deal with Billy Rowell when do you see him getting out of Frederick and helping Brandon Snyder out there?

J.J. Cooper: Not any time soon I would expect. He's having a tough time adjusting to the outfield and he's hitting OK, but nothing that says "move me up." A scout who recently saw him wasn't impressed with his body language. The implication was that he didn't looked thrilled to be at the ballpark.

Not good.. Not good at all..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply
From today's BA's Chat :

Jarin McKay (Greenville, NC): Whats the deal with Billy Rowell when do you see him getting out of Frederick and helping Brandon Snyder out there?

J.J. Cooper: Not any time soon I would expect. He's having a tough time adjusting to the outfield and he's hitting OK, but nothing that says "move me up." A scout who recently saw him wasn't impressed with his body language. The implication was that he didn't looked thrilled to be at the ballpark.

Not good.. Not good at all..

I'll put more stock into what the Orioles scouts and coaches think of him than an unnamed scout said. From all accounts from our staff, his attitude has been very good this year.

He's got a long way to go to get back on the prospect map, but he's also got a lot of time to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From today's BA's Chat :

Jarin McKay (Greenville, NC): Whats the deal with Billy Rowell when do you see him getting out of Frederick and helping Brandon Snyder out there?

J.J. Cooper: Not any time soon I would expect. He's having a tough time adjusting to the outfield and he's hitting OK, but nothing that says "move me up." A scout who recently saw him wasn't impressed with his body language. The implication was that he didn't looked thrilled to be at the ballpark.Not good.. Not good at all..

Wow, I wonder if he thinks he should just keep his multi-million dollar signing bonus for doing nothing?:confused::rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I wonder if he thinks he should just keep his multi-million dollar signing bonus for doing nothing?:confused::rolleyes:

I just wonder if he is one of those guy who is just not emotional about the game. There is nothing wrong with that. I wonder if they see how he acts and then finds it a good way to rationalize underperformance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I wonder if he thinks he should just keep his multi-million dollar signing bonus for doing nothing?:confused::rolleyes:

Eh, I am always a little skeptical when I hear about somebody observing someone's "body language" at a game and drawing conclusions about the player's attitude. The Orioles' brass has been very complimentary about Rowell's attitude this year. i will believe that until there is some solid evidence to the contrary.

More importantly, Rowell is off to a solid start with the bat: .284/.369/.405 and still one of the youngest players in the Carolina League. In his last 9 games he's hit .393/.474/.515. I don't call that "doing nothing."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, I am always a little skeptical when I hear about somebody observing someone's "body language" at a game and drawing conclusions about the player's attitude. The Orioles' brass has been very complimentary about Rowell's attitude this year. i will believe that until there is some solid evidence to the contrary.

More importantly, Rowell is off to a solid start with the bat: .284/.369/.405 and still one of the youngest players in the Carolina League. In his last 9 games he's hit .393/.474/.515. I don't call that "doing nothing."

I wasn't referring to his stats but the scout's apparent observation that Rowell looked like he would rather not be on the field, which is a very bizarre observation for such a young ball player. I mean what else does he want to be doing? Most fans I know would give their right gonad to be able to play a baseball game while making millions of dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wonder if he is one of those guy who is just not emotional about the game. There is nothing wrong with that. I wonder if they see how he acts and then finds it a good way to rationalize underperformance.

Good point, similar things were thought of Erik Bedard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't referring to his stats but the scout's apparent observation that Rowell looked like he would rather not be on the field, which is a very bizarre observation for such a young ball player. I mean what else does he want to be doing? Most fans I know would give their right gonad to be able to play a baseball game while making millions of dollars.

Some of them give off the impression that being in a certain level is "beneath them" but I don't think a scout could gather that watching him once or twice. It would show on the field too, you can't just turn off emotions like that if you are having them. Look for signs like not running balls out, dogging it in warm-ups, trying to be the first one for cuts in BP and then heading inside every time, things that will incur the wrath of a manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't referring to his stats but the scout's apparent observation that Rowell looked like he would rather not be on the field, which is a very bizarre observation for such a young ball player. I mean what else does he want to be doing? Most fans I know would give their right gonad to be able to play a baseball game while making millions of dollars.

I know what you were referring to, but let's look at where this comes from and where you've now taken it:

J.J. Cooper: Not any time soon I would expect. He's having a tough time adjusting to the outfield and he's hitting OK, but nothing that says "move me up." A scout who recently saw him wasn't impressed with his body language. The implication was that he didn't looked thrilled to be at the ballpark.

OK, so the only thing we are going on here is "a scout who recently saw him wasn't impressed with his body language." We don't know who that scout was. We don't know what "body language" he saw, or why the scout "wasn't impressed."

Then J.J. Cooper spins that to "the implication was that he didn't look thrilled to be at the ballpark." Mind you, that's not what the unidentified scout said, that's J.J. Cooper's "implication."

And now you are taking Cooper's implication to mean that "Rowell looked like he would rather not be on the field." Which is even a little further than Cooper took it.

To me, this is just so much rumor-mongering. I do not know if Rowell still has attitude issues or not. But so long as the Orioles are saying they have been happy with his attitude this year (and they have said that at least 2-3 times), I am not going to assume otherwise because some unidentified scout went to a game and didn't like his body language.

And yes his statistical performance on the field is relevant to this, because it shows Rowell has been working on his game and improving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I wonder if he thinks he should just keep his multi-million dollar signing bonus for doing nothing?:confused::rolleyes:

Why do you constantly hammer this kid? He is 20 years old and at High A. I know that he hasn't met your expectations, but you have NEVER seen him play yourself and are taking the word of an unnamed scout during a random chat at BA as gospel. Since your an Oriole fan why don't you try to root for a kid who has had a rough adjustment to pro ball instead of a seemingly bitter old fan who thinks this kid is just lazy and not wanting to work.

I just don't understand how anyone can take the information we have and have hate for a 20 year old kid. To me, Billy Rowell is my new Brandon Snyder, the more people kick him the more I will root for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you constantly hammer this kid? He is 20 years old and at High A. I know that he hasn't met your expectations, but you have NEVER seen him play yourself and are taking the word of an unnamed scout during a random chat at BA as gospel. Since your an Oriole fan why don't you try to root for a kid who has had a rough adjustment to pro ball instead of a seemingly bitter old fan who thinks this kid is just lazy and not wanting to work.

I just don't understand how anyone can take the information we have and have hate for a 20 year old kid. To me, Billy Rowell is my new Brandon Snyder, the more people kick him the more I will root for him.

Well for one thing, all I seem to hear and read are negatives. That is not what I want to see in any highly touted prospect regardless of their age. Root for him all you want, but these reports are disturbing to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, I am always a little skeptical when I hear about somebody observing someone's "body language" at a game and drawing conclusions about the player's attitude. The Orioles' brass has been very complimentary about Rowell's attitude this year. i will believe that until there is some solid evidence to the contrary.

More importantly, Rowell is off to a solid start with the bat: .284/.369/.405 and still one of the youngest players in the Carolina League. In his last 9 games he's hit .393/.474/.515. I don't call that "doing nothing."

Bill was at Spring Training a week before position players. He was working extremely hard at drills the day I watched him. If he is a slacker with a bad attitude, he hid that for an entire day. I think more likely, the "body language" author has an addenda. You know. Like Nestor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill was at Spring Training a week before position players. He was working extremely hard at drills the day I watched him. If he is a slacker with a bad attitude, he hid that for an entire day. I think more likely, the "body language" author has an addenda. You know. Like Nestor.

Could it be an agenda or simply that his perception is skewed by the constant negative reports that are offered for Rowell day after day? I think scouts might sometimes be looking for the negative with a kid that they've heard only negative things about not because they have it out for Billy but more because that's what they're expecting. I'm personally much more bullish on Billy right now than I was at the end of last season after the many of the reports on here and his moderately successful start to the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well for one thing, all I seem to hear and read are negatives. That is not what I want to see in any highly touted prospect regardless of their age. Root for him all you want, but these reports are disturbing to me.

It's pretty easy to find all the negatives when that's all you want to look for. Has he had some possible trouble in the past? Did he have a rough adjustment to pro ball and did he have a rude awakening? Yeah, he did, but give the kid a chance. You seem so willing to berate him and yet so unwilling to let him learn and grow. Maybe I'm too young and naive to understand the world like you do, but I do know that from age 17 to current age 19, I learned a lot about myself and I experienced a lot of growth, and I considered myself to be a pretty mature kid. I'm also sure that from 19-21 I'll learn a lot too. Billy has probably learned a lot about himself since he entered pro ball, and I bet that in the next few years he'll naturally mature as a person. You seem so stubborn that you won't give him a chance to right the ship.

Honestly, I think you should steer clear of the Rowell threads until the season is over. Let the season play out, let him develop and keep the biased criticisms to yourself. Just give him a chance to prove his lofty prospect status, and if he fails both physically and mentally then you can have at him all you want. Sorry for the rant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know what you were referring to, but let's look at where this comes from and where you've now taken it:

OK, so the only thing we are going on here is "a scout who recently saw him wasn't impressed with his body language." We don't know who that scout was. We don't know what "body language" he saw, or why the scout "wasn't impressed."

Then J.J. Cooper spins that to "the implication was that he didn't look thrilled to be at the ballpark." Mind you, that's not what the unidentified scout said, that's J.J. Cooper's "implication."

And now you are taking Cooper's implication to mean that "Rowell looked like he would rather not be on the field." Which is even a little further than Cooper took it.

To me, this is just so much rumor-mongering. I do not know if Rowell still has attitude issues or not. But so long as the Orioles are saying they have been happy with his attitude this year (and they have said that at least 2-3 times), I am not going to assume otherwise because some unidentified scout went to a game and didn't like his body language.

And yes his statistical performance on the field is relevant to this, because it shows Rowell has been working on his game and improving.

I don't mean to nitpick, Frobby, but you left out the scout also saying he is having a hard time adjusting to the OF position, and is not hitting enough to scream promotion. I just figured if we're going to break down what the scout said, everything should be included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If you're projecting a future lineup without Mullins in 2026, then EBJ is a reasonable placeholder name to put in there. I would assume most people understand that it's not a sure thing to work out that way. 
    • Every year players are injured sliding head first into bags or even worse home plate. Just noticed that EBJ has a head injury from sliding head first into home (really dangerous and stupid) I'll say it again, what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players I remember when David Sequi was a decent player and ended his career with a serious hand injury sliding head/hand first into home. Cal never slid head first, and wouldn't have been the iron man if he did.
    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...