Jump to content

If you think this Organization Blows, is the laughing stock of MLB, then


Fan4Life

Recommended Posts

The article is spot on. Fielder at 23 million a year is a no brainer for the Orioles they should have done it in a second. They are paying all these players nobody wants and will likely not even be on the team a year from now. By the time you add up all the bums they sign it will probably be close to 23 million. And none of them is going to get a fan interested in the team. The best point the author makes is they haven't been near .500 in 15 years an all-star first baseman isn't going to hurt them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 113
  • Created
  • Last Reply
"I never expected the Orioles to sign Fielder. When rumors of the Orioles? interest in the slugger surfaced late last week I assumed it was just Scott Boras using his industry connections in an attempt to drum up interest"

Then why write this article because he is clearly writing this because he is PO'd they didn't sign Fielder.

Because they should have signed him. They need him a lot more than the Tigers. They have a lot more available payroll than the Tigers. It is just another example of the Oriole incompetence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just flabbergasted that while the Organization and the team deserve much of the criticism they have gotten, NOBODY (at least that I can find) sees ANY upside to the organizational and team changes.

I generally prefer being the underdog and thought of as horrible and then kicking your A**... than being touted constantly as a team on the move with regular disappointment....

so.. I seem conflicted..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just a, flabbergasted that while the Organization and the team deserve much of the criticism they have gotten, NOBODY (at least that I can find) sees ANY upside to the organizational and team changes.

I generally prefer being the underdog and thought of as horrible and then kicking your A**... than being touted constantly as a team on the move with regular disappointment....

so.. I seem conflicted..

Because they are signing journeymen and career minor leaguers. Who is going to see the positive in that? They hired a GM that has been out of baseball for 10 years who has hired a bunch of 75 year old sidekicks. And they proceed to make moves that make Andy M. look like he knows what he was doing. I see Chen as having the potential to be a good signing. Potential. Maybe 1 in 3 chance of suceeding. The others are casts-offs and nobody else wants. Basically DD is assembling a AAA team. Unfortunately the Orioles play in the big leagues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging by his logic, I bet this author lives in a $400,000 house,That was foreclosed on in June when he squatted back in the bank owned home but has to sit on patio furniture in his living room because his Rent a Center Furnishings were burnt for firewood .

That's the guy I imagine. I am constantly amazed at how few people get this. I guess they think that we should just dream up a credit default swap and peddle it to widows.

And the Orioles absoultely stink. But I have a glimmer of hope. And that hope would not have been enhance by Angelos gifting us with Prince Fielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because they are signing journeymen and career minor leaguers. Who is going to see the positive in that? They hired a GM that has been out of baseball for 10 years who has hired a bunch of 75 year old sidekicks. And they proceed to make moves that make Andy M. look like he knows what he was doing. I see Chen as having the potential to be a good signing. Potential. Maybe 1 in 3 chance of suceeding. The others are casts-offs and nobody else wants. Basically DD is assembling a AAA team. Unfortunately the Orioles play in the big leagues.

He's fixing the infrastructure of the franchise. Who is 75 besides the Asian scout Pointivant or whatever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because they are signing journeymen and career minor leaguers. Who is going to see the positive in that? They hired a GM that has been out of baseball for 10 years who has hired a bunch of 75 year old sidekicks. And they proceed to make moves that make Andy M. look like he knows what he was doing. I see Chen as having the potential to be a good signing. Potential. Maybe 1 in 3 chance of suceeding. The others are casts-offs and nobody else wants. Basically DD is assembling a AAA team. Unfortunately the Orioles play in the big leagues.

Can you outline for me what you think we should have done that we didn't do (Fielder aside), and what we did and shouldn't have that would have made feel better about things?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just flabbergasted that while the Organization and the team deserve much of the criticism they have gotten, NOBODY (at least that I can find) sees ANY upside to the organizational and team changes. I generally prefer being the underdog and thought of as horrible and then kicking your A**... than being touted constantly as a team on the move with regular disappointment....

so.. I seem conflicted..

ML team is still terrible and while the off the field stuff is great, we have no idea if the results will be there. Its great that it has been addressed but until results are seen, they are going to continue to be a joke, laughing stock, pathetic or whatever wording you want to use.

We went through this same conversations when AM first came aboard and after he traded Miggy and Bedard...WHY AREN'T PEOPLE TAKING NOTICE OF THE ORIOLES?????

Its because they still suck! Win and they take notice...its that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ML team is still terrible and while the off the field stuff is great, we have no idea if the results will be there. Its great that it has been addressed but until results are seen, they are going to continue to be a joke, laughing stock, pathetic or whatever wording you want to use.

We went through this same conversations when AM first came aboard and after he traded Miggy and Bedard...WHY AREN'T PEOPLE TAKING NOTICE OF THE ORIOLES?????

Its because they still suck! Win and they take notice...its that simple.

Maybe it is.

That said, I didn't think the article was that bad. Just a bit pessimistic. I mean, the guy's clearly a glass-half-full guy about his cleverness (that have-have not thing is a groaner) but he's mostly right. The likely outcome is a bad season. The question is, why is this really even that huge a disappointment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ML team is still terrible and while the off the field stuff is great, we have no idea if the results will be there. Its great that it has been addressed but until results are seen, they are going to continue to be a joke, laughing stock, pathetic or whatever wording you want to use.

We went through this same conversations when AM first came aboard and after he traded Miggy and Bedard...WHY AREN'T PEOPLE TAKING NOTICE OF THE ORIOLES?????

Its because they still suck! Win and they take notice...its that simple.

But to say the on the field product is terrible is admitting that you see no upside or changes from the pitching (young pitchers specifically), no real positive changes from Wieters, Jones, Reimold or at least not enough to make any difference.

These are the same players most of us were ballyhooing 2 years ago... have we determined they are a collective bust?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rochester

I do like "...a couple of lottery tickets from Japan." but I can not, for the life of me, remember when someone used the word "blows." People still say that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it is.

That said, I didn't think the article was that bad. Just a bit pessimistic. I mean, the guy's clearly a glass-half-full guy about his cleverness (that have-have not thing is a groaner) but he's mostly right. The likely outcome is a bad season. The question is, why is this really even that huge a disappointment?

I didn't even read the article because it doesn't really matter what is said or not said or if it is poorly written or whatever.

The bottom line is we all know what this team is. If people want to not see it for what it is, that's fine...they can do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Haven't read further in the thread to know if it's been noted, but there is a Concussion Protocol List which has a shorter maximum duration than the 10 day IL.   I think it is 5 days? So no doubt the move being made is: Mateo to the CL, with Vespi replacing him on the roster (since Vespi hasn't been down 15 days, he can only come up to replace someone going on an injury list). Norby coming up because we need 13 position players, and a pitcher going.   My guess is Vieira DFA.   It's pretty damn telling that in the post game yesterday Hyde said he had to stick with Tate as long as he did because he didn't have any rested RH relievers in the pen.   Vieira hadn't pitched in 6 days.
    • Still better than many internal options. 
    • It will be interesting to see how they handle Norby. Norby can play 2B and corner outfield, but he's a below average defender at 2B.  The Orioles history suggest Norby will be a bench guy for now with Urias slotting in at 3B and Westburg at 2B mostly while Mateo is out. Saying that, Norby give the Orioles a good right-handed bat off the bench and a guy who could spell Mullins with Cowser slotting over to CF.  The question is whether Norby will get some Hays PAs?  I'd personally like to just drop him at 2B and keep Westburg at 3B with Urias on the bench, but that would not be how the Orioles typically break in non "impact" rookies.  Either way, this is a well earned major league debut for Norby. Here's to hoping he's given a chance to play a bit. 
    • I think it’s a fair argument to make about players like Kjerstad. His promotion was questioned at the time as he was raking in AAA and there was not an obvious opportunity to play when promoted. And sure enough he sat on the bench primarily for weeks and was demoted. i think there’s a difference between promoting a player like Kjerstad and promoting a Maton etc. Our top prospects should only be promoted if they are going to get a long leash on playing time a la Holliday (IMO)
    • Notwithstanding age and position, I think I'm still on Team Adley for priority 1. One of the management talking points is around avoiding the risk of "creating complacency" when a ballplayer good enough to rate it gets their forever fortune. I think the other side of that being too stingy is "creating resentment" in your labor force. Burnes is an interesting cat as he's taken some actions that real world illustrate how created resentment looks in the cliches only constrained world of ballplayers and clubs interacting with media. I think Elias/Sig modeling a healthy respect for the opportunity Burnes has just about earned himself might help even if they know today their recommendation to ownership is an aggressive chase that already has the green light.     Information how Burnes fares the next 4-5 months is valuable, especially how his stuff plays against the best of the best once he's 30.     Fun fact ALCS Game 7 could fall 10.22.2024 precisely on Burnes' 30th birthday.   
    • Is Rich Hill an option? I believe he was looking to sign with someone mid year. Would we consider him?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...