Jump to content

EJax to the Nats!


markdublya

Recommended Posts

1) What a moron he is for taking a 1 year deal.

2) How sad it is that the Orioles could put a 3 year deal on the table, TO A BORAS CLIENT, and have him go somewhere for ONE year?

If that doesn't tell you what the perception of the Orioles around baseball really is, I don't know what to tell you.

What a disaster this organization is.

How would you ever convince a pitcher in his right mind to come here? Semi-hitters park, poor defense, poor team, American league East. All of that adds up to a run or more on your ERA. And while wins don't matter, it's still ugly to put up an 8-17 record and be considered a quality pitcher. Unless the O's make an offer to a pitcher that sets him up for life, free agents just aren't going to come here who have any sense of self-preservation. It's why I agree that we need to develop pitching from within. Not sure what, if anything, O's offered in this case, but if I had any confidence in myself as a pitcher going beyond this next year, I'd forgo a mid-range contract with the O's for a 1-year deal with an up-and-coming team in the NL east.

Grow the arms, buy the bats is the only thing that is going to work for the O's until we claw back to some level of respectability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1) What a moron he is for taking a 1 year deal.

2) How sad it is that the Orioles could put a 3 year deal on the table, TO A BORAS CLIENT, and have him go somewhere for ONE year?

If that doesn't tell you what the perception of the Orioles around baseball really is, I don't know what to tell you.

What a disaster this organization is.

The rumor is between $8-$12mm. If it turns out to be $8, you have an excellent point. If he gets $12mm, then your point isn't much of a point afterall. I'm presuming the O's didn't offer more than 3@$24.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rumor is between $8-$12mm. If it turns out to be $8, you have an excellent point. If he gets $12mm, then your point isn't much of a point afterall. I'm presuming the O's didn't offer more than 3@$24.

Which is why the O's went 3/$24M why should they have to give him $16M more than anyone else? The Nats are going to start the season with Harper in right and they might win a championship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is why the O's went 3/$24M why should they have to give him $16M more than anyone else? The Nats are going to start the season with Harper in right and they might win a championship.

I'm not sure it's that as much as he realized he wasn't going to get paid what he thinks he's worth in a multi-year contract. So he has decided to get a decent paycheck for one season, up his value, and try it again next year. None of this has anything to do with the Orioles... well.. maybe a little. If they weren't the last place team in the best division, then maybe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is why the O's went 3/$24M why should they have to give him $16M more than anyone else? The Nats are going to start the season with Harper in right and they might win a championship.

Then again, they probably will finish fourth. Poor team offensively with legacy money owed for the future. Maybe Morse will be good again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rumor is between $8-$12mm. If it turns out to be $8, you have an excellent point. If he gets $12mm, then your point isn't much of a point afterall. I'm presuming the O's didn't offer more than 3@$24.

So, I have no point yet you are you are presuming how much the offer is? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you ever convince a pitcher in his right mind to come here? Semi-hitters park, poor defense, poor team, American league East. All of that adds up to a run or more on your ERA. And while wins don't matter, it's still ugly to put up an 8-17 record and be considered a quality pitcher. Unless the O's make an offer to a pitcher that sets him up for life, free agents just aren't going to come here who have any sense of self-preservation. It's why I agree that we need to develop pitching from within. Not sure what, if anything, O's offered in this case, but if I had any confidence in myself as a pitcher going beyond this next year, I'd forgo a mid-range contract with the O's for a 1-year deal with an up-and-coming team in the NL east.

Grow the arms, buy the bats is the only thing that is going to work for the O's until we claw back to some level of respectability.

Its still job security...If the Orioles offered 6-7M a year, then I can see it...But if they offered in the area of 9M a year(which I tend to think they did), then he is dumb for giving it up.

Next year's pitching market is very good...plus, the injury factor is always there for pitchers.

For 1 or even 2 years? I get it. For 3 + an option? No way, unless the Orioles offered next to nothing in terms of salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I have no point yet you are you are presuming how much the offer is? LOL

My point isn't so much about the O's offer as Jackson wanting to up his value for another year and take another stab at it. There is no reason AT ALL for him to take a one year deal from the O's, yet you criticize the O's for that. I am leaving open the possibility that he signed for $8mm with the Nats and we offered 3@$18-ish which would be an insult and deserving of every criticism you have to offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point isn't so much about the O's offer as Jackson wanting to up his value for another year and take another stab at it. There is no reason AT ALL for him to take a one year deal from the O's, yet you criticize the O's for that. I am leaving open the possibility that he signed for $8mm with the Nats and we offered 3@$18-ish which would be an insult and deserving of every criticism you have to offer.

1) His incentive to wait another year is a poor one for all the reasons that have been explained.

2) If the Red Sox or some team was good was offering him a 3 year deal, he would take it.

For you to act as if this isn't an indictment on the Orioles and where they are as a franchise is absurd and incredibly wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then again, they probably will finish fourth. Poor team offensively with legacy money owed for the future. Maybe Morse will be good again.

Are you kidding??? Rotation:

Gonzalez

Strasburg

EJax

Zimmermann

Lannan

Is there a better top-to-bottom rotation in the NL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Mateo has an open stance at the plate and also stands back from the plate. Hence, he is very susceptible to the  slider or sweeper off the plate. I was expecting a strike out last night with runners on first and third. In fact, he had two swings and misses at outside breaking pitches during that at bat. But, the pitcher threw one that was in the wrong place and Mateo ripped it. He is doing a good job of staying on those pitches he can handle. And, as stated above, not quite as prone to wave at outside breaking stuff. He is fun to watch.
    • @now had it right - I saw it also on the O's Xtra pregame show - Rob Long did a 2-day "school" talking with Sig on the advanced stats.    I think this is it. I've joked before you can get a lead on Orioles targets just looking at whose ERA-FIP differential is bad. I believe the 30 GM's collectively are past that as they negotiate with each other, but I'm sure they are all trying to optimize each individual negotiation. Its fun to watch Sig navigate what do I want to say to the MASN viewer that none of the other 29 orgs can scrape for tidbits of anything the Orioles are drilling in on. "We like players who are good"
    • Miller is mikes better than any of our relievers. One bad outing doesn’t change that. Felix had bad outings before. It happens.
    • As I said, in my second post, he has improved, I don’t care what he did last year. I’m much more interested in what he’s doing this year. And he’s improved, but he still walking seven batters per nine, and as far as I’m concerned, No. He was maddening when he was here, and I expect that he would be if he returned
    • Is that true? I don't think that it is. I think baseball and other sports are similar in this respect. I picked a random NHL player... literally the first one I stumbled on, Luc Robitalle. He played 19 years in the NHL. Had a peak goal scoring season of 63, and also had seasons of 23, 15, 11, 30. Heung-min Son is a poplar Premier League soccer player, a forward, for Tottenham Hotspur. In his nine years with the club he's scored totals including 4, 14, 12, 11, 23, and 10 goals. Wayne Rooney was a regular starter in the Premier League from 2002-2018 and had goals scored totals anywhere from six to 27, including consecutive years in his prime of 27, 11, 11, 26. In the space of eight years Wilt Chamberlain had season average scoring marks of anywhere from 24 to 50 points per game. In 1981 John Riggins played in 15 NFL games, rushed 194 times for 714 yards and 13 TDs. In 1983 he played in 15 games and rushed 375 times for 1347 yards and 24 touchdowns.
    • It's all good... and good reply. 
    • Mejdal was interviewed during the TV broadcast... maybe two weeks ago. He repeated his preference right at the end of the interview (IIRC, from the stands or field). 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...