Jump to content

vs. BLUE JAYS 5/29


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 449
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think you guys are being a bit reactionary when it comes to Jake being moved to the pen. His ERA--after that disastrous inning--is now 5.12, which is clearly bad, but not horrible in the AL East.

Moreover, his peripherals suggest he has been the victim of serious bad luck this year.

I'm not arguing the guy is a TOR starter, or even a #3 starter-- I never really have, and the hype and expectations for him earlier this year always seemed unwarranted. He has decent stuff but he lacks a lot--such as, for one thing, control--to make him an above average starter. But if he is given the whole year as a SP I'm sure he would finish with an ERA under 5, and that is a lot better than anyone in our system not named Hammel, Chen, and possibly Matusz or Britton can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arrieta doesn't belong in the Major Leagues. He clearly has flaws, and probably needs another pitch.

Well...let's see...Arrieta doesn't belong in the major leagues, Hunter doesn't belong in the major leagues...that leaves Matusz...who is sort of day to day whether he belongs in majors or not...Chen is OK middle of the road starter and Hammel has been pitching way over his lifetime stats and seems likely due for a comeback to earth in the next go round the A.L. Hmmm...that leaves us with pretty limited starters....hurry up Zach and hurry up Dylan Bundy, I guess.....the Macphail plan was always contingent upon Arrieta and Matusz both becoming top starters and that sure has not happened yet....guess we will see if the Dylan Bundy era turns out any better...in a year or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure how graduate school and professional baseball are comparable.

You guys have coaches and medical staff all over the place?

Not saying it is impossible, just seems really unlikely given his environment.

Glad you got diagnosed.

I'm not sure how much you know about ADD, and I don't mean to tell you anything you don't already know.

But there's nothing about baseball (or baseball organizations) that lead me to believe it would somehow be sensitive to the issue - I mean, I'm not sure why a coach would notice ADD, or even how a coach would know what to look for. Indeed, baseball culture is notoriously slow to notice all sorts of anomalous/problematic mental issues - including issues much more obvious than ADD. I would expect, at 25 or whatever, a diagnosis of ADD for Davis would have been a lot more likely while growing up, w/in the structure of a classroom, than by baseball's culture.

(I'm not sure how ADD would impact an athlete, either, game-wise. In retrospect, I was attracted to sports as a kid (including baseball) at least in part because its fixed-but-fluid environment created a space where my ADD wasn't intrusive. Not sure how this changes as the game gets more and more difficult, and faster and faster.)

With adults, ADD is pretty rarely diagnosed until some kind of (i) failure; or (more likely) (ii) some kind of legal trouble/crisis/etc. (To me, any field that require sustained intellectual work, across varying levels of interest, would generally be more likely to provide the moments of failure that provoke diagnosis.) Essentially, coping mechanisms that are built up over a lifetime stop being enough. There's a ton of co-morbidity w/ ADD, as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • You’re thinking Adley becomes something like the B-Rob/Mora extensions where the strictly best move would probably be to trade but an extension is highly defensible and even worst case scenario by no means kills the team? Mora/B-Rob, if memory serves, probably would’ve been fine had the rest of the team not been so directionless.
    • It's a crying shame when one very bad call by the home plate umpire, on an obvious strike, can cost a team the game.  It happened to us yesterday.  How critical can one single win can be at the end of the regular season, as for the playoffs coming?  
    • I'm guessing there must not be an "Anthony Santander 2024" thread....lol. 
    • Hopefully, if they have to trade Gunnar it's with a year and a half of control instead of a rental to maximize the return.
    • Gunnar would be the main one at this point. It's going to take the Witt contract plus, but he's the kind of player that you can build around on a 10 year deal.   There's a plenty of other options but I'd rather start with him. If he's not interested then you move on...all depending on what ownership will go for as well.
    • Just look at the Braves. Stuck with all those players and in 2nd place.
    • In a traditional/historical sense, Gunnar would more likely reside in the 3, 4 or 5 spots in the lineup. But this new-age baseball that we have seen evolve over the last few years does seem to place more of a priority on getting your best hitters the most ABs. As others have mentioned, look at Soto in his career, look at Ohtani, etc. But what hasn't been mentioned (that I've seen, maybe I missed it) is that this new era of baseball also shows us that a sub .200 hitter can be successful in the leadoff spot when they mash like Schwarber does for the Phils. I think it's just as likely that Hyder keeps penciling in Gunnar in the top spot because Gunnar feels comfortable there but also because of his ability to set the table for the rest of the lineup to start the game. That is really what the leadoff guy's job is to do. He's lead off with a homer what, five times this year? That's five games where the O's were on the board just one batter into their turn to hit. For a younger lineup like the O's have now, I think it's extremely important that they use whatever advantage they think they have as early in the game as possible. We've seen them struggle to score runs early in a lot of the games this year. They don't ever seem to lay down but battling from behind is not the ideal position to be, especially at the frequency that has been so far this year. I suspect that increased pressure may eventually catch up with them. So, yeah, if Gunnar is their best power hitter but also gives the team the best opportunity to score early, I'm fine with him hitting first in the order even if it means fewer guys on base when he's at the plate.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...