Jump to content

Attendance to Date: 12.5% Over 2011


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

Should go over the 1,000,000 mark today, 38 home dates in (there will only be 80 this year due to an unscheduled doubleheader earlier this season to make up a rainout). Looking down the road, the O's have a Thursday-Sunday series with the Yankees on Sept. 6-9 and a Friday-Sunday series with the Red Sox on Sept. 28-30. They have a weekday series with the Red Sox on August 14-16. No other huge draws like the Nats and Phillies, but I'm reasonably optimistic they can reach 2.1 mm in attendance this year, and maybe 2.2-2.3 mm depending on how long they stay in the race.

Which begs the question: Is there really any doubt they would draw 3+ million a year if they just put a consistently competitive product on the field?

I don't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 215
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Well, I don't know about 3 Million, they still only drew 18K last night. I know that's during the week but I was hoping for at low 20s. They still require 37K a game for 3 million but at least we can somewhat debunk the theory that the DC fans were the reason for good attendance in the 90s. There were plenty of Nats fans last weekend but it was dominant like a Sox or Yanks game.

I think a consistent, good product would yield about 2.5m a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I don't know about 3 Million, they still only drew 18K last night. I know that's during the week but I was hoping for at low 20s. They still require 37K a game for 3 million but at least we can somewhat debunk the theory that the DC fans were the reason for good attendance in the 90s. There were plenty of Nats fans last weekend but it was dominant like a Sox or Yanks game.

I think a consistent, good product would yield about 2.5m a year.

I look at it this way -- we drew 2.6 mm in 2005, the year the Nats arrived. That was after the team had 7 losing seasons in a row. That tells me that, even with the Nats around, a consistently winning team in Baltimore would draw 3 million. The drop from 2.6 mm in 2005 to the more recent season is more a function of constant losing than it is the Nats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18,000 on Wednesday was not a good crowd. Nice weather and the O's still had the second lowest attendance of any team. Winning has helped this year but if they go on a skid they will be back to the usual low crowds. Winning brings the crowds out and they need to keep the fans hopes up. Attendance for the Phils and Nats on the weekend would have been close to sellouts even if the team was losing. This weekend series crowds against Cleveland should be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18,000 on Wednesday was not a good crowd. Nice weather and the O's still had the second lowest attendance of any team. Winning has helped this year but if they go on a skid they will be back to the usual low crowds. Winning brings the crowds out and they need to keep the fans hopes up. Attendance for the Phils and Nats on the weekend would have been close to sellouts even if the team was losing. This weekend series crowds against Cleveland should be interesting.

Last summer, we played a Thursday-Sunday 4-game series with the Indians that drew 92,741. So, there's your marker. The Thursday game drew 22,780. That series was in mid-July. This one should draw better, I think, but it's a matter of how much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I don't know about 3 Million, they still only drew 18K last night. I know that's during the week but I was hoping for at low 20s. They still require 37K a game for 3 million but at least we can somewhat debunk the theory that the DC fans were the reason for good attendance in the 90s. There were plenty of Nats fans last weekend but it was dominant like a Sox or Yanks game.

I think a consistent, good product would yield about 2.5m a year.

DC fans weren't the sole reason, but they were certainly an input. Not only were they a component of the high attendance, they were likely a very well-heeled component with much higher than average revenue attached. Read about Jack Abramoff for about 10 minutes and it's clear that the Orioles used to be a regular destination for lobbyists from K street and their buddies. Now almost all of them go to Nats Park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last summer, we played a Thursday-Sunday 4-game series with the Indians that drew 92,741. So, there's your marker. The Thursday game drew 22,780. That series was in mid-July. This one should draw better, I think, but it's a matter of how much better.

Tonight is buddy night and a T-Shirt giveaway. The buddy night might get another 5.000 in the park. We shall see how close we come to the 22,700.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tonight is buddy night and a T-Shirt giveaway. The buddy night might get another 5.000 in the park. We shall see how close we come to the 22,700.

Not close. 17,676. But it may be that people who want to go to a game in this series are choosing the Earl Weaver game on Saturday. Let's see what the four game total is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not close. 17,676. But it may be that people who want to go to a game in this series are choosing the Earl Weaver game on Saturday. Let's see what the four game total is.

I think the terrible heat is going to hurt attendance some this weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
    • Can someone in 150 words or less explain to me what DYAR is?
    • I have a 3 hour round trip to get to games. I can't speak about other directions, but the stadium is very easy to get to from the south...some more traffic with the earlier start times, but overall - games are VERY easy to get to, imo. You don't have the hike through the city to get to games. I'm a rural guy, and it's really not a big deal. We took the light rail from Cromwell for Game 1 (I usually park in BC or FGH) and it was a breeze. We walked out right after the game, and we immediately caught a direct bus that took us back to Cromwell directly. We did the same thing last year. I gotta be honest - I think the "they've been horrible for half the season" reasoning is pretty lame. Even when they were down (and dealing with significant injuries) after the AS break, they were still essentially a lock to make the playoffs. Then they get healthy-ish with some key guys back riiiiight before the playoffs and look great for a couple of series - but I guess it was too late for everyone?  Come on.  Just say you didn't feel like it. But don't blame August play for not showing up in October.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...